Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 8:11:32 AM)


Theyre not extremists any more, nor are they radicals, nor observant. Guess what this AP reporter chooses to call them? [;)]


quote:


Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches, 12 killed


CAIRO – Muslim mobs set two Cairo churches on fire overnight during sectarian clashes that left 12 dead and more than 200 injured. The deepening religious violence in military-ruled Egypt exacerbated an already chaotic and lawless transition to democracy.

Mobs of ultraconservative Muslims attacked the St. Menas church in the Cairo slum of Imbaba late Saturday following rumors that a Christian woman married to a Muslim man had been abducted. Local residents said a separate mob of youths armed with knives and machetes attacked the Virgin Mary church several blocks away with firebombs.

...

Islamic clerics denounced the violence, sounding alarm bells at the escalating tension during the transitional period.

...


But in the months that followed the toppling of Mubarak on Feb. 11, there has been a sharp rise in sectarian tensions, fueled in part by newly active ultraconservative Muslim movement, known as the Salafis.

The once quiescent Salafis have become more assertive post-revolution in trying to spread their ultraconservative version of an Islamic way of life. In particular, they have focused their wrath on Egypt's Christians, who make up 10 percent of the country's 80 million people.
...

Full article at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110508/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_egypt_sectarian_clashes




[image]local://upfiles/292349/989C8BEC7C9343D6B9365099E26704C1.jpg[/image]




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 8:21:13 AM)

The next step is neo-con Muslims.




Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 8:36:00 AM)


Welcome back Willbe...

Do you think it makes me a racist, allowing my eyes to fall on the article?  [;)]







pahunkboy -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 8:38:31 AM)

Burning a church down is rude. 




Musicmystery -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 8:53:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Theyre not extremists any more, nor are they radicals, nor observant. Guess what this AP reporter chooses to call them? [;)]


quote:


Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches, 12 killed


CAIRO – Muslim mobs set two Cairo churches on fire overnight during sectarian clashes that left 12 dead and more than 200 injured. The deepening religious violence in military-ruled Egypt exacerbated an already chaotic and lawless transition to democracy.

Mobs of ultraconservative Muslims attacked the St. Menas church in the Cairo slum of Imbaba late Saturday following rumors that a Christian woman married to a Muslim man had been abducted. Local residents said a separate mob of youths armed with knives and machetes attacked the Virgin Mary church several blocks away with firebombs.

...

Islamic clerics denounced the violence, sounding alarm bells at the escalating tension during the transitional period.

...


But in the months that followed the toppling of Mubarak on Feb. 11, there has been a sharp rise in sectarian tensions, fueled in part by newly active ultraconservative Muslim movement, known as the Salafis.

The once quiescent Salafis have become more assertive post-revolution in trying to spread their ultraconservative version of an Islamic way of life. In particular, they have focused their wrath on Egypt's Christians, who make up 10 percent of the country's 80 million people.
...

Full article at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110508/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_egypt_sectarian_clashes




[image]local://upfiles/292349/989C8BEC7C9343D6B9365099E26704C1.jpg[/image]


Did you read this? It's how the Salafis characterize themselves, in word, purpose and action, and a direction denounced Islamic clerics.

I can't imagine how you figure any of that is about race, including your views. But the reporter told it like it was. If anything, the headline is misleading (fault of the editor), implying a broader group than the perpetrators includes.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 8:56:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I can't imagine how you figure any of that is about race, including your views.


I read that as a hijack of his own thread in reference to the ludicrous efforts to brand him a racist while I was "gone".




Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 9:20:19 AM)


I posted the OP, so yes of course I read it... silly!

It seems extreme to me... for you to suggest that anyone merely discussing or questioning the continuing radicalization of Islam has to be a racist.

And no, the headline isnt at all misleading, its factual. Dont you just hate that?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Did you read this? It's how the Salafis characterize themselves, in word, purpose and action, and a direction denounced Islamic clerics.

I can't imagine how you figure any of that is about race, including your views. But the reporter told it like it was. If anything, the headline is misleading (fault of the editor), implying a broader group than the perpetrators includes.









Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 11:31:59 AM)


But they had an excuse, a Muslim was rumored to have married  Christian

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Burning a church down is rude. 




Lucylastic -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 1:06:04 PM)

This part of your quote seems to have escaped you
<snip>Mobs of ultraconservative Muslims attacked the St. Menas church in the Cairo slum of Imbaba late Saturday following rumors that a Christian woman married to a Muslim man had been abducted. <snip>
Has anyone heard about the woman? or the husband?




Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 1:50:06 PM)


No Lucy, I read the article, I am the one who posted it, remember? [:D]

And, as many Muslims view women as property the term "abducted" may be misleading in this instance




ashjor911 -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 2:10:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

And, as many Muslims view women as property the term "abducted" may be misleading in this instance




Oh my holy Jesus !!




Lucylastic -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 2:29:27 PM)

so you didnt give it any thought
What a suprise




Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 3:37:02 PM)


Yes I considered it, and I posted about it before you even brought it up

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3664648

Do you seriously believe thats a good excuse Lucy, as thats what you seem to be trying to suggest

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so you didnt give it any thought
What a suprise





Lucylastic -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 3:50:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Yes I considered it, and I posted about it before you even brought it up

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3664648

Do you seriously believe thats a good excuse Lucy, as thats what you seem to be trying to suggest

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so you didnt give it any thought
What a suprise



No you posted


quote:


But they had an excuse, a Muslim was rumored to have married  Christian


Nothing to do with anyone being abducted
so you didnt mention it
I bolded the part about abduction
You ignored it AGAIN
And seriously dooood, try making up some other straw man for me, LOL






Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 4:29:16 PM)


Lucy my dear, I also posted that the term "abducted" may not be an accurate term for what occurred, which is true

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3664780

It really sounds like it was more of an interfaith marriage, and why should that be forbidden




Lucylastic -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 4:36:55 PM)

round and around and around you didnt mention it before I asked, then just gave it a cursory look and dismissed it.
disapear up your own posterior and give us all a rest.
Why do you only go on just the report (as usual) instead of questioning what is behind a situation like I did.
Ive found a huge amount of information about it since I first asked.
I should have known better than to expect you to be able to do the same





Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 4:51:17 PM)


Why not cut through the mindless bullshit Luce, and answer the question (if you dare) -

Do you really think they had reason to burn the two churches, even if there was an abduction?




Lucylastic -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 4:58:23 PM)

Funny how you never seem to answer mine, so in the spirit of  childishness, answer all mine you have missed, without changing goalposts or "re-framing" or editing of any kind. Until then be well aware....You have an inferiority complex - and it's fully justified.
Gnite
edited to add
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Why not cut through the mindless bullshit Luce<snip>


Your mindless bullshit is too convoluted for you? I can see why.


Finished editing now




Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 5:02:17 PM)


Its an easy enough question... but its just as I thought.  [:D]




Sanity -> RE: Muslim mobs burn Egyptian churches (5/8/2011 5:04:37 PM)


Yes my son?

[image]http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/23269_117091518329838_6129_n.jpg[/image]

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashjor911

Oh my holy Jesus !!










Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875