Najakcharmer
Posts: 2121
Joined: 5/3/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lkehoeluckekeh fair play to you superior Mistress Sassy , you have a deal of control over her although I dont know why you want to control women what gives there, but again you are living proof of my point 24 seven slavery is an illusion, a fantasy not a reality as your slave works outside the home and has a life of her own, but again fair play That depends on what you consider an illusion. I've been in 24/7 relationships where my collared sub/partner gave themselves over to me to the extent that my decisions absolutely superceded any desires or judgement of theirs. If I said, quit your job and we're moving to further my career, that would happen. If I said, I'm going to pierce your nipples and cock, brand and tattoo you, or make other permanent body modifications, that would happen. If I said, give me complete control over all the money and property, that would happen. That was not illusion, that was reality. It was reality because we both consented to this level of relationship, we both wanted it, and we both chose this lifestyle. He felt completely safe and happy making this choice because he trusted my ethics. One 24/7 relationship I had in mind specifically, when I released him, I made sure he was taken care of. I bought him a car which I wanted him to keep, and made sure he went away with enough money and household items to be okay on his own. We'd been together long enough that our possessions were pretty much in common, and technically I owned everything, but there was no way I was going to leave him less well off than I'd found him. He ended up returning the car to me eventually, because his ethical standards were of a similar nature to mine and he wanted to make sure I wasn't going to be the poorer for our relationship either. I am not rich, and the car was in fact a significant chunk of money for me even though it was a used one. Given two people with a high level of trust and ethical standards, and a committment to working hard to maintain a healthy D/s relationship, the power exchange is real. It's not real because one person is physically incapable of withdrawing their consent. It's real because he keeps giving that consent every single day in love and trust and willing submission. Me, I can't think of anything that could be more real than that. I can also imagine a situation of the type you seem to be defining as "real", where a slave is stuck, powerless but hating it, in a situation he really can't get out of. I can't think of any situation that would be LESS real to me. If one person in the relationship is staying only because they have no choice, it would suck a whole lot to be the other person in that relationship. In vanilla terms, we call that a marriage of convenience, staying together for the kids' sake, an abused woman staying with a husband she hates because she can't afford to live on her own, etc, etc. Is that kind of relationship more "real" because two people who might not like each other much any more are stuck in it? You can, theoretically, confine the body and make it physically impossible for a slave to walk away. But there have not yet been bonds invented that can hold the unwilling heart. I don't want a D/s relationship with an empty, unwilling body. I want it from the heart. I want to live in the willing desire fierce enough to leave marks on freely offered flesh, the love so intense that it takes chains and a collar to express completely. Anything else, to me, is not real.
< Message edited by Najakcharmer -- 5/11/2006 1:19:22 PM >
|