RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


SilverMark -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/18/2011 4:29:27 PM)

He had his penis diamond encrusted.




tazzygirl -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/18/2011 4:34:03 PM)

A Saudi businessman has purchased what is being described by the Canadian seller as the world's most expensive adult novelty item - a solid 18-carat gold penis enlarger worth nearly $US50,000 ($59,240).

Little is known about the buyer, except that he lives in Jeddah.
His glitzy new penis enlarger, however, is being encrusted at his request with 40 diamonds and several rubies and is to be delivered by armoured car in October, said Rick Oh, X4 Labs co-owner.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/strangebuttrue/saudi-pays-stiff-price-for-sex-toy-20090806-eah1.html#ixzz1MkYyyyy2

I just couldn't resist!




flcouple2009 -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/18/2011 9:24:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
I don't get it.  If he's got the money, why quibble over how he spends it?  Out of all the reasons why he should not be President, this one's not a biggie.


I think a lot of people just find the fact that Mr fiscally responsible owes 25% of his assets to a jewelry shop hysterical.

We make fun of rappers and pro athletes who do that.  We don't generally encourage them to run for president.

And I fully agree there is much to dislike that will keep him from getting elected than this.




Sanity -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 5:30:32 AM)


If its fair game to snoop around Newt Gingrichs private finances... why would asking about Obamas school records be considered racist




Hillwilliam -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 5:40:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


If its fair game to snoop around Newt Gingrichs private finances... why would asking about Obamas school records be considered racist


Maybe because financial disclosure is a requirement for running for POTUS and a lot of other public offices and transcripts are not?




Sanity -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 5:50:27 AM)


Why do you post bs [:D]

Financial disclosure is not a requirement to run for president...

Citizenship is, however. [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


If its fair game to snoop around Newt Gingrichs private finances... why would asking about Obamas school records be considered racist


Maybe because financial disclosure is a requirement for running for POTUS and a lot of other public offices and transcripts are not?




mnottertail -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 5:59:05 AM)

Why do you post such blatantly ignorant and lying shit Sanity?  Its not just a good idea, it's the LAW.





Sanity -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:13:37 AM)


From the article farglebargle linked to for his OP:

quote:



As a presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich would have to file a personal financial disclosure form.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55125.html#ixzz1MntCQmZ5


I wont hold my breath awaiting your apology mnot...




ArizonaBossMan -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:16:21 AM)

Newt would be an improvement over o'dumbo any day. Sarah would be a vast improvement. Neither is my candidate. I'm still sorting them out. But, ABO: ANYBODY but o'dumbo for now.




mnottertail -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:18:48 AM)

You shouldn't be waiting, you should be formulating an apology to me, I have no idea whats in the link and dont give a fiddlers fuck.

Hint: Where were you in 1971? Read any papers?  Know anything about United States Code?  Or are you using ignorance of the law as your excuse?  Cuz you could be excuses on those grounds for alot of shit, if it was found acceptable.   




Termyn8or -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:20:21 AM)

I'd sooner vote for someone who showed up at my front door in jeans and a Tshirt with a sixpack than anyone who has ever been on TV.

T^T




mnottertail -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:22:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArizonaBossMan

Newt would be an improvement over o'dumbo any day. Sarah would be a vast improvement. Neither is my candidate. I'm still sorting them out. But, ABO: ANYBODY but o'dumbo for now.


Well, you know the old saw.....wish in one hand, shit in the other.....




mnottertail -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:24:01 AM)

I'm waiting, Tom..........




PilotPTK -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:33:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

I don't get it.  If he's got the money, why quibble over how he spends it?  Out of all the reasons why he should not be President, this one's not a biggie.



Putting it on credit is, BY DEFINITION, not having the money.


Really? So when I buy a couple of airline tickets on my delta skymiles amex in order to get my bag checked for free, I did that not because I wanted my bag checked for free but because I didn't have the money for the ticket?




mnottertail -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:37:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


From the article farglebargle linked to for his OP:

quote:



As a presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich would have to file a personal financial disclosure form.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55125.html#ixzz1MntCQmZ5


I wont hold my breath awaiting your apology mnot...



C'mon, you should be caught up to even the late 70's by now, where is my apology, Tom?

Still can't find it on Faux Nuze or the Rushfelcher website?

Further hint (now you get no extra credit) Title 5. Ethics.....see if you figure it out from there, Tom. 





Sanity -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:51:45 AM)


Alright, I misread that, I was wrong. [:)]




mnottertail -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 6:58:52 AM)

Fair enough, accepted with all the grace I can muster, Tom.

Now, let's move on.

Back to the topic, Newt ; fiscal conservative?  Not fuckin' so:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/may/11/newt-gingrich/newt-gingrich-inaccurate-budget-debt-claims-video-/

and while you may quibble about the link's ownership, the same numbers appear on the government website.

So, the truth is out there.




ShadowMster -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 7:16:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Maybe because financial disclosure is a requirement for running for POTUS and a lot of other public offices and transcripts are not?


Actually, there is no such requirement. It's only a tradition.

You must be over 40 yrs old, and a natural born citizen of the US. You can be a total idiot, or you can be a genius and still be president.





mnottertail -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 7:20:50 AM)

Dude, bad time to step in there with your untutored opinions.  Real bad, traditionally as well as socially.

1971 Campaign Finance Reform

USC Title 5 app. Ethics. Title I. para 101.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05a/usc_sec_05a_00000101----000-.html

40 years now, c'mon, its the 90's....hell, it's the 10's, lets get with the program.  Know what you're voting for.




ShadowMster -> RE: Newt Gingrich, a fiscal conservative? Not when it comes to Tiffany’s. (5/19/2011 7:24:55 AM)

I stand corrected.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125