quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

I'm partisan, and biased distinctly towards liberalism - doesn't mean I can't step back and look at the big picture - the democratic leadership doesn't always represent my interests, damn seldom lately in fact, but I tell them that instead of blindly defending them because they aren't "the enemy".

Tell me something, being someone who like me looks at an issue from as many cogent sources as you can before formulating at least your final view on some topic that's been thrown out wherever ... Does it make you kind of twitch for a second and then say "WTF???" when they vomit up the word liberal and go off into a way out of context description of your belief system. It does that to me anymore. I used to, up until about a year or two ago try to see it as 'well people have been through a wicked grinder  the past decade of two, and maybe they are just changing in terms of how they think'. But I no longer believe that. All the verbatim sentences, all the incorrect terminolgy... It's GOT to be programming working at it's best

Mr. Murdock and his colleagues, and especially his paid employees are doing an excellent job. irregardless of whether it's completely unfair and unbalanced.

It's called "framing", and a lot of it is driven by astroturfers in forums like this one, people who are really paid PR flacks who stir up shit under the pretense that it's a "grass roots" thing, even though it invariably follows the script coming straight out of AEI.

You gotta be blind not to see that, but alas, even my Dad is suffering from a Limbaugtomy, just like half the Town.

And they say we're in lockstep, shit, you can't have an independent opinion as a conservative anymore if it isn't straight out of the AEI and it's channels, it's not allowed. It's depressin', I tell ya - didn't people used to have more sense than that?

That's why I like Gary Johnson, but they'll dry gulch him, he hasn't got a snowballs chance of getting the nomination.

quote:

The Kool Aid drinkers are the ones launching the personal attacks, usually

They cant debate the actual argument so they go after the messenger instead

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

The Kool Aid drinkers are the ones launching the personal attacks, usually

They cant debate the actual argument so they go after the messenger instead

I commend you for taking ownership of what you are up to in your capacity as a kool-aid drinker. I see this as a tremendous leap forward.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

If you meant biased, you should have said biased. But the op has already explained several times why she started the thread. Maybe if you go back you will catch it this time. I'll skip all the bs religious references because they are just that.

quote:

Unfortunatley in this society the other kid will probably be a politician.

quote:

Thank you SternSkipper, for making my point for me so beautifully.

quote:

SternSkipper

But you know what makes me proudest of this guy? it's that he is for the most part, one of the gentlest young men I have ever seen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


So... how much are you getting paid to post here




Gawd, i love this shit... if someone dares disagree with an all knowing leftist, its because theyre getting paid to. Or theyre brainwashed by the eviiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil FOX NEWS channel... Or, or, or.

Its always attack the messenger with these people, never realizing how ridiculous their (non) arguments are.

Ive even got my very own shadow in these forums. He rarely posts anything smart, relevant or witty but he gets his snark in after my every post to be sure that messenger gets attacked.

Being the good leftist that he is...

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

Deep down you both really have some issues.

You want to portray women as victims and men as victimizers.

Actually I posted that boys were often forced into prostitution too, which seems to have eluded you...

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

If you meant biased, you should have said biased. But the op has already explained several times why she started the thread. Maybe if you go back you will catch it this time. I'll skip all the bs religious references because they are just that.

Maybe if you go back you'll find out we sorted all that out already, try to keep up.

What BS religious references? Organized religion is basically organized around human trafficking, always has been, it's all about marrying your daughters off to the right families, that's how the European institution of marriage evolved, to cement political alliances - the woman seldom got to choose who she married, depending on what political-economic issues were at stake, was for the most part not allowed to divorce (Henry VIII had to cut of their heads), and to some extent, that's still true, depending on the religion and local attitudes.

It's never been about love, that for sure, wasn't very long ago, not only couldn't you marry outside your race (for mostly religious reasons), but marriage outside your religion entailed significant social drama, since each side wanted to claim the kids, and the only reason anybody cared about the kids was because of  patrimonial inheritance and attendant political influence.

Mainstream Christianity bears very little resemblance to anything remotely supported by the bible, the polar opposite in most cases, it's nothing but politics anymore, aristocracy replaced with crony capitalism, so that's exactly how I treat it, it's just another PAC.

So, address it, by all means, but all claims to the protection of sanctity will be ignored, you haven't drug us all the way back to the Dark Ages yet.

Aren't you gay? Is this some new kind of lesbian self-loathing?

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

Then you're going to have to clarify.

I realize it's against conservative policy to do anything but make unsupported pronouncments, but I have to ask for forms sake.

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

That wasn't clarification, just more rhetoric, so, nothing to respond to. You should go yammer with Sanity.

quote:

Its not that difficult to grasp. Are you being deliberately obtuse?