RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/25/2011 9:28:06 AM)

Sexual Arousal and Orgasm in Subjects Who Experience Forced Stimulation

Early Malnutrition Linked to Later Aggression, Hyperactivity

Maternal  Affection and Adult Stress

One of numerous such studies, more discussion here:

Before Ethics and Morality

Rapes (per capita)(most recent) by Country

No Zeros in there, most, with the exception of South Africa, are below 1%, so what is different there?




xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/26/2011 1:56:33 PM)

The model here really is the Eastern European toxic dystopias - by the time you get there, it's not easy going back.




Politesub53 -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/26/2011 4:28:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Im still waiting for my cock pic


I just can't quite fit it all into the camera lens.



Try using the zoom [8D]

Welcome back BTW




slvemike4u -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/26/2011 6:12:31 PM)

Will any cock pic do....or was this an exclusive request ?




xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 6:48:41 AM)

My last post above was a mispost, obviously, but I did wan to address this post, which I missed before:

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

...............Prostitutes provide a valuable service, I don't like the idea of prosecuting Johns, because every guy frequenting a prostitute is one guy who isn't molesting his or someone else child - ..............


To me, this means men are no more than slobbering hounds thinking with their dicks. I don't believe that.

It's not a john's "fault" that the prostitute is out there, but with no demand, there would be no one coerced into supplying it. If no one's buying, no one is going to try to sell.

ETA: Pedophiles are not violating because they can't get regular age appropriate sex. How does that explain married perps??
First off, who much experience do you have with prostitutes? That pretty stereotypical, I don't frequent them as I mention elsewhere, but I've been around them at various times during the course of many eclectic careers, and for the most part, the  pro/john relationship is not significant different on the face of it than that of a single woman, other than she asks you if you want a "date", and it's a relatively short date, you skip dinner and movie, and you end up at a hotel instead of her house.

But even watch cops or something, you'll see that - the customers are often working men, guys working out of town, etc. without the time or connections to woo an amateur.

Otherwise, getting laid can be a pretty time consuming process, women are suspicious, with good reason, and they are often surrounded by a cloud of jealous suitors, girlfriends, etc., etc., there whole books written on the subject, it requires time and money, you need a wingman, etc., you need game.

Think about what you put a guy through before you sleep with him, most women don't just fall into bed with the first guy that asks, not since the Seventies anyway, some sort of relationship has to be established first, it's why players play, i.e., they usually got a string of 'em going at once so if one don't pan out they got another one lined up.

"Slobbering hounds" definitely is not it, the slightest hint of desperation and you're out so fast it'll make your head spin, you got to be cool as a cucumber, and able to conceal your disappointment, you start ragging chicks out if they shoot you down, word gets around, that's just life, you wanna play the game, you follow the rules, whatever they may be.

Prostitution is no different, just quicker, they're still women, they still demand a modicum of respect and human feeling, we all need human contact - hell, in Eighties, people in NYC were paying people just to hang and be friends, so intense had the narcissistic cliquishness become.

When it comes to pedophilia, another stereotype is that they're all the same - the set of men who sexually molest children is not homogeneous, it's extremely heterogeneous, and age doesn't even have to be the primary attractor or even figure into it - children are vulnerable, and that makes them an attractive target of opportunity, presumably, the vulnerability itself may be an attractor, if the alternative experience is willful or socially aggressive women.

I realize I'm treading on thin ice here, and I'm not trying to rationalize anything, I'm trying to ascertain what the potential motivations might be - even psychological professionals don't necessarily understand what  is going on in the mind of a sexual predator, and part of the reason for that is one is not always able to ascertain the chain of events that put that person into a psychological state where he was capable of contemplating and acting out on such a thing, one cannot rule out negative incidental social or psychosexual experiences.

Enculturation is one of the primary jobs of women, like it or not, the mother is the primary social influence on a child up to the age of about Five so don't tell me that there are no potential consequences of that when it comes to how a man idealizes women.

I'm not making an accusation, I'm saying think about it: it's largely outside my experience as well, and I suspect a Domina might have a great deal more insight and experience with these sorts of psychodynamics..

We do know, that social stress is no small thing, it can literally kill you - see social death - it can turn a child into a psychopath, although the mechanism might be different than I previously described, see this article on how stress may be inherited without altering the DNA itself: Effects of stress can be inherited and here's how.

quote:

Over 20 years ago, Ishii and his colleagues discovered a gene in yeast (called activation transcription factor-2 or ATF-2 for short)that is required for those tightly packed, heterochromatin structures to form. ATF-2 is altered by stress-activated protein kinases in response to environmental stress, inflammatory cytokines, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). But it wasn't entirely clear what this might mean for other organisms.


In other words, the DNA isn't altered during recombination, but another factor that affects behavior of heterochromatin is passed along and effects changes in a neo-Lamarikian fashion.

That's at least Two different methods I'm aware of that can account for stationary phase mutation, and neo-Lamarkian inheritance.




xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 6:59:02 AM)

The upshot is, you combine an angry, frustrated adult male with low empathy and poor socialization skills, you got a disaster waiting to happen, and yes, masculine culture and peer pressure has a great deal to do with that, i.e., in what ways Machismo is permitted to be expressed.




tweakabelle -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 8:10:44 PM)

First this:
quote:

rape is a reproduction strategy, with a certain degree of success


then this:

quote:

and for the most part, the  pro/john relationship is not significant different on the face of it than that of a single woman, other than she asks you if you want a "date", and it's a relatively short date, you skip dinner and movie, and you end up at a hotel instead of her house.

and then this:
quote:


Prostitution is no different, just quicker, they're still women, they still demand a modicum of respect and human feeling, we all need human contact


You've made it very clear that you regard women as little more than convenient holes to stick a dick into whenever the need arises. No doubt you agonise over whether women should ever have been given the vote. Care to share why you hate women so much?




Edwynn -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 8:11:37 PM)




quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
I did a google search for sex slavery in the United States because it is a huge human rights issue that is currently going on here.


You did a sex slavery search in efforts to find further substantiation for your contempt of men, due to one or two bad choices in your own life.

Congratulations on your success there.






tweakabelle -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 8:58:16 PM)


Unfortunately Edwynn, your post leaves your position on the issue of sex slavery unclear.

Could you please clarify whether you believe:
(a) sex slavery is a human rights issue; and
(b) whether it is a legitimate political issue in the US.

By way of background, official figures estimate that 14,500-17500 women and children are trafficked per annum in the US (US Department of State Trafficking in Persons Report 2006)

Thank you




Edwynn -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 9:05:23 PM)



Tweaker, the response was addressed to the OP and some obviously very human, i.e. 'personal' issues on her part.

The r/l instance of ongoing slavery is another concern, and one as should not be so lightly regarded, which the original bleating of "why can't men keep it in their pants" so uncerimoniously dismissed from the outset.

If one wants to be serious about human slavery, then be serious about it.







tweakabelle -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 9:31:19 PM)

I'm relieved to hear that you regard it as a serious issue.

What do you think ought to be done about in that case? Do you agree that the beneficiaries of those sexually enslaved - the pimps, the clients and so on - share some responsibility for the situation of the enslaved? Do you feel that men have any role in dealing with these issues? How can men contribute towards resolving this ugly situation? Do you feel that for instance, it ought to be a criminal offence to knowingly engage the services of someone enslaved?




Edwynn -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 9:51:46 PM)



Are you aware that women are involved in essentially every instance and most every aspect of slave trafficking, sexual, underage, or otherwise?

Are you aware that at least some females make use of these 'services'?

Let's get that far, then see if rational discussion can result thereon.

It is a bad thing.

Period.

But when the object is to substantiate some women's hostility towards men due to bad past experience, and subsequently glom a much more serious issue in service to that, then pardon if I might smack that down, and no hesitation about it.

It is a real issue, not some frikkin' flaming coat to throw at the crowd.







tweakabelle -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 10:40:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
But when the object is to substantiate some women's hostility towards men due to bad past experience, and subsequently glom a much more serious issue in service to that, then pardon if I might smack that down, and no hesitation about it.

It is a real issue, not some frikkin' flaming coat to throw at the crowd.


Why do you keep bringing this up if it's irrelevant? Rightly or wrongly, it creates the impression you're the one with the baggage. Can we agree to leave aside thanks.


quote:


Are you aware that women are involved in essentially every instance and most every aspect of slave trafficking, sexual, underage, or otherwise?

Are you aware that at least some females make use of these 'services'?

Let's get that far, then see if rational discussion can result thereon.

It is a bad thing.

Period.

Of course women are involved in trafficking and enslavement. Such women deserve no mercy from the law when they're caught and charged. And exactly the same for all the others involved in organising sex slavery too wouldn't you agree?

However overwhelmingly the purchasers of services offered by enslavers are males. I'd be surprised if women constitute more than a couple of percentage points of the 'clientele', if that. And while I am open to the possibility of adult males being enslaved sexually, I can't say I can recall a case of it. So it appears undeniable that the overwhelming majority of those enslaved are women and children, and the overwhelming majority of those purchasing their services are males.

To me it seems that the first step to be taken towards remedying the situation is the repeal of laws against all sex workers, (that includes male sex workers) recognition that sex work is a job like any other and enforcement of reasonable standards of working conditions, health and safety, insurance etc. Would you agree with that?




Edwynn -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/27/2011 11:05:38 PM)



quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
But when the object is to substantiate some women's hostility towards men due to bad past experience, and subsequently glom a much more serious issue in service to that, then pardon if I might smack that down, and no hesitation about it.

It is a real issue, not some frikkin' flaming coat to throw at the crowd.


Why do you keep bringing this up if it's irrelevant? Rightly or wrongly, it creates the impression you're the one with the baggage. Can we agree to leave aside thanks.


Let's keep up with the meaning and understanding of language here. I never said that personal experience was inappropriate of itslelf, just that the OP used another situation inappropriately.

It's less a matter of what I keep bringing up rather than what you accept and don't question about the title of the OP; read the facts again, painful as the process might be.

Why do you keep ignoring the glaring issue in the title of the OP but rather poke me in the chest and press me for my credentials for 'humanitarian concerns' when the OP obviously hasn't, and if we get to actual stones sticks and coal, I'm not sure how much you have either.






tweakabelle -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/28/2011 12:18:26 AM)

quote:


It's less a matter of what I keep bringing up rather than what you accept and don't question about the title of the OP; read the facts again, painful as the process might be.

Why do you keep ignoring the glaring issue in the title of the OP but rather poke me in the chest and press me for my credentials for 'humanitarian concerns' when the OP obviously hasn't, and if we get to actual stones sticks and coal, I'm not sure how much you have either.


Because I am interested in doing something about sex slavery. I couldn't care less about what the OP might or mightn't say.

That is why my last post ended with a practical easy-to-achieve suggestion on how to begin resolving the issue. If you wish to discuss this matter with me, that's the kind of thing I'm interested in exploring.

If you prefer to continue moaning about the OP ... that's your choice, go for it but please count me out.




Edwynn -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/28/2011 5:22:59 AM)



That's a good strategy, unoriginal as it may be; pester someone relentlessly, then refer to their response as 'moaning.'

If that's all you're about, then no trouble accommodating your wish to be counted out. You've done that well enough on your own, actually.







tweakabelle -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/28/2011 2:28:03 PM)

Don't blame me Edwynn. You had a choice and you exercised your choice freely. It's yours. Own it.

Anyone can check out our exchange over the last 6 or so posts. It only takes a glance to see who was interested in engaging on the issue of sex slavery and who was using the opportunity to bring up other, more personal issues.





willbeurdaddy -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/28/2011 2:48:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

First this:
quote:

rape is a reproduction strategy, with a certain degree of success


then this:

quote:

and for the most part, the  pro/john relationship is not significant different on the face of it than that of a single woman, other than she asks you if you want a "date", and it's a relatively short date, you skip dinner and movie, and you end up at a hotel instead of her house.

and then this:
quote:


Prostitution is no different, just quicker, they're still women, they still demand a modicum of respect and human feeling, we all need human contact


You've made it very clear that you regard women as little more than convenient holes to stick a dick into whenever the need arises. No doubt you agonise over whether women should ever have been given the vote. Care to share why you hate women so much?



Care to share why you continually misrepresent what people have said?




tweakabelle -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/28/2011 4:54:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

First this:
quote:

rape is a reproduction strategy, with a certain degree of success


then this:

quote:

and for the most part, the  pro/john relationship is not significant different on the face of it than that of a single woman, other than she asks you if you want a "date", and it's a relatively short date, you skip dinner and movie, and you end up at a hotel instead of her house.

and then this:
quote:


Prostitution is no different, just quicker, they're still women, they still demand a modicum of respect and human feeling, we all need human contact


You've made it very clear that you regard women as little more than convenient holes to stick a dick into whenever the need arises. No doubt you agonise over whether women should ever have been given the vote. Care to share why you hate women so much?



Care to share why you continually misrepresent what people have said?

I looked and looked and looked, trying to discover whatever it is Willbur is rabbiting on about. And eventually I found something that could, at a looooooong stretch, be called 'misrepresentation' by someone who doesn't know what the word 'misrepresentation' means.

I'll leave it to others to decide whether I ought to have said;
"You've made it very clear that you regard women as a modicum more than convenient holes to stick a dick into whenever the need arises" rather than "you regard women as little more than ....."

But no matter how I look at it, this doesn't amount to 'misrepresentation' not even a modicum of it.[:D]




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (6/28/2011 4:56:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

First this:
quote:

rape is a reproduction strategy, with a certain degree of success


then this:

quote:

and for the most part, the  pro/john relationship is not significant different on the face of it than that of a single woman, other than she asks you if you want a "date", and it's a relatively short date, you skip dinner and movie, and you end up at a hotel instead of her house.

and then this:
quote:


Prostitution is no different, just quicker, they're still women, they still demand a modicum of respect and human feeling, we all need human contact


You've made it very clear that you regard women as little more than convenient holes to stick a dick into whenever the need arises. No doubt you agonise over whether women should ever have been given the vote. Care to share why you hate women so much?



Care to share why you continually misrepresent what people have said?

I looked and looked and looked. And eventually I found something that could, at a looooooong stretch, be called 'misrepresentation' by someone who doesn't know what the word 'misrepresentation' means.

I'll leave it to others to decide whether I ought to have said;
"You've made it very clear that you regard women as a modicum more than convenient holes to stick a dick into whenever the need arises".

But no matter how I look at it, this doesn't amount to 'misrepresentation' not even a modicum of it.[:D]


I wouldnt expect you to suddenly change your spots and not intentionally misrepresent what people have said. Nothing he said remotely could lead to your conclusion without other supporting statements.




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625