RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants?

RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Musicmystery -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 6:50:55 AM)
quote: If you read the other thread that spawned this one, perhaps you would understand that. You might have mentioned that in the OP. People don't read every thread here.

juliaoceania -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 6:52:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xssve quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: Well the title makes it a partisan thread, Where does the title mention a specific party? Not politically partisan, but gender biased - biased if you buy the argument that a lot of the Johns are married to religious martyrs who only do it for purposes of reproduction, which I'm sure is the case in more than a few instances, given that a lot of this seems to be occurring in the bible belt. As opposed to politically partisan - men are all dogs is more a lefty, feminist meme, and that's what the thread title manages to imply to some extent. The men in my life are not dogs. My father wasn't a dog, 50% of my brothers are not dogs ( I have one doggish brother), my brother in law is not a dog. My son is about the bestest person I have ever known. I have mostly male friends in real life. I only date men. If you asked my son if I was biased against men he would laugh at you. Edited to add, this thread was in response to one about Muslim mothers....it was designed to get a certain reaction.... which is why it is titled the way that it is. I do not believe American men cannot keep it in their pants

Sanity -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 6:53:32 AM)
I disagree Leftists have no standards, as the Clinton case proved. Further, leftists use others' standards to attack them... See Alinskys rules for radicals Or any thread attacking "the party of family values" Etc quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys Demonizing and justifying is a people thing, not political.

xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:00:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Also a great example of how powerful leftists feel they are above the law, and why they feel that way. Leftist ideology is very slippery, anything or any one can be justified or demonized depending only on its relationship to the leftists mindset. So you're rationalizing pre-emptively by demonizing "leftists" as demonizers? Do unto others before they do unto you? Not all partisan critiques are off base, it's the right that's been adamant about deregulation, and getting the goverment out of their lives - regulating prostitution is one of those things that's explicitly delegated to congress under the commerce clause, and the whole human trafficking/prostitution situation is a lovely example of an unregulated market. Presumably, you prefer to wait for the market to decide? Seem to me it has.

Icarys -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:09:29 AM)
quote: If you asked my son if I was biased against men Not sure all of what he's written but this part I see too.

Sanity -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:12:06 AM)
Thats some twisted logic, and the answer is no. And... I honestly doubt that you understood what I wrote, or at least what the premise of what I wrote is. quote: ORIGINAL: xssve So you're rationalizing pre-emptively by demonizing "leftists" as demonizers? Do unto others before they do unto you? Not all partisan critiques are off base, it's the right that's been adamant about deregulation, and getting the goverment out of their lives - regulating prostitution is one of those things that's explicitly delegated to congress under the commerce clause, and the whole human trafficking/prostitution situation is a lovely example of an unregulated market. Presumably, you prefer to wait for the market to decide? Seem to me it has.

Icarys -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:12:11 AM)
So no rights have ever attacked lefts or centers? Hell I see it all the time. I see attacks going on by all sides.

Sanity -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:16:02 AM)
And I didnt write that, either. quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys So no rights have ever attacked lefts or centers? Hell I see it all the time. I see attacks going on by all sides.

xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:30:18 AM)
It's your logic - but to save the Mods some time and headaches, I suggest we get back on topic, plenty of other threads we can debate this. quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Thats some twisted logic, and the answer is no. And... I honestly doubt that you understood what I wrote, or at least what the premise of what I wrote is. quote: ORIGINAL: xssve So you're rationalizing pre-emptively by demonizing "leftists" as demonizers? Do unto others before they do unto you? Not all partisan critiques are off base, it's the right that's been adamant about deregulation, and getting the goverment out of their lives - regulating prostitution is one of those things that's explicitly delegated to congress under the commerce clause, and the whole human trafficking/prostitution situation is a lovely example of an unregulated market. Presumably, you prefer to wait for the market to decide? Seem to me it has.

rulemylife -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:33:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I actually don't, I just wanted to see what the reaction would be.... so far it is what I was expecting So, in other words you are just playing games.

juliaoceania -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:39:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I actually don't, I just wanted to see what the reaction would be.... so far it is what I was expecting So, in other words you are just playing games. I was demonstrating a point, a rather obvious one... you can call it what you will.

Icarys -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:46:50 AM)
quote: So, in other words you are just playing games. Maybe it's just American men she doesn't like.

rulemylife -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:47:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I disagree Leftists have no standards, as the Clinton case proved. Further, leftists use others' standards to attack them... See Alinskys rules for radicals Or any thread attacking "the party of family values" Etc quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys Demonizing and justifying is a people thing, not political. It's so funny to me that no liberals ever mention Alinsky yet conservatives claim that his writings are the liberal bible. And the party of family values is non-existent. But if you want we can compare the multitude of Republican scumbags with Clinton. Who was that guy in the Minneapolis airport who just had a wide stance? How about the guy from Nevada who just resigned? Sen. John Ensign sex scandal spreads to other Republicans Sen. Tom Coburn and former Sen. Rick Santorum appear to have been involved in the scandal that brought down former Sen. John Ensign. A Senate Ethics Committee investigation could lead to criminal charges for Ensign.

xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:52:21 AM)
Whatever, glad to hear it, I get it, it's a counter to all the Muslim bashing going on, and in that, you're absolutely right, point taken: it's an international issue, including Americans - even more of an American issue really, given the whole notion we're supposed to be setting some example for the rest of the world, and they all hate us 'cause we're so good. quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania The men in my life are not dogs. My father wasn't a dog, 50% of my brothers are not dogs ( I have one doggish brother), my brother in law is not a dog. My son is about the bestest person I have ever known. I have mostly male friends in real life. I only date men. If you asked my son if I was biased against men he would laugh at you. Edited to add, this thread was in response to one about Muslim mothers....it was designed to get a certain reaction.... which is why it is titled the way that it is. I do not believe American men cannot keep it in their pants

SternSkipper -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:55:53 AM)
quote: Diseases are good: 1. they cause resistance against those diseases to evolve, and 2. they remove the predilection to visit a prostitute- genotypes from the gene pool. Hook me up with ONE, just one example where ANYWHERE in the history of the human genome, where one can say conclusively that there was genetic evolution wherein a formidable immune response was developed to a sexually transmitted disease. With certain VERY OBSCURE exceptions, you post has jack to do with julia's thesis. You're supposition works fine with cuts and scrapes getting infected with a limited number of types of bacterium, or cold strains after going through a population. I mean no offense by this, but it belongs in a bactine support forum.

xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 7:58:33 AM)
The right must read Alinsky all the time - anybody ever disagree with them on anything that hasn't been demonized? Turn on conservative talk radio or listen to fox, it's nothing but bashing Muslims, Gays, Feminists, Blacks, Mexicans, Liberals, Poor people, etc., etc, etc., it's non stop, it's virtually all they do. Shit, Clinton is almost Twenty years ago now, we have a lot fresher scandals you know. Reagan and GW were both accused of rape too - but that's probably demonizing, yeah?

SternSkipper -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 8:02:42 AM)
quote: quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I actually don't, I just wanted to see what the reaction would be.... so far it is what I was expecting So, in other words you are just playing games. Try think of it as an experiment with an eye on qualifying and quantifying the reaction. Then picture yourself as a fuzzy little lab rat, that oughta massage that sub lobe in your brain.

xssve -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 8:07:21 AM)
What happens is it turns into the usual tedious partisan bickering - experiment concluded. You really think a Kool-Aid drinker like Sanity is gonna go "oh, yeah, you're right - we're no better than they are"? Dream on.

Icarys -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 8:25:21 AM)
quote: Kool-Aid drinker It's sickening to see just how many people are actually this. I see it in social settings and political settings. Cheerleaders.

Sanity -> RE: Sex Slavery in The US: Why can't American Men Keep it in their Pants? (5/20/2011 8:25:50 AM)
Sorry, no, the point is lost on you and your making up a strawman to cast stones at in the stead of understanding the point and arguing the actual merits isnt useful quote: ORIGINAL: xssve It's your logic - but to save the Mods some time and headaches, I suggest we get back on topic, plenty of other threads we can debate this.

Page: << < prev 7 8 [9] 10 11 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625