ParappaTheDapper
Posts: 190
Joined: 4/28/2011 Status: offline
|
If I recall correctly, Shakespeare, Milton, Chaucer, and possibly Sir Walter Scott were the most frequently cited sources in the OED's first edition. My main man Dryden also ranked high and was quoted as authoritative on the issue of whether "protagonist" could ever be pluralized (it can! it can!) or whether a story/sporting event/historical event could only by definition ever have a single protagonist. I think Johnson (via Boswell) was the deciding factor in whether "anxious" and "eager" could technically be used interchangeably (Oxford says yes!) or whether the nuance of dread implied in "anxious" made it a wholly unacceptable synonym. The evolution of the first OED is colorful and endlessly fascinating! I think it would be a hoot if, in some future society, Kanye and Jay Z are appealed to as sources as to whether "fly" and "dope" can be used interchangeably. They should not be, by the by. "Fly" and "dope" should not be used interchangeably, I mean. Yeezy and Jay Z are absolutely authorities! ETA The final two sentences. quote:
ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss I love that people play with words and turn them into something completely new! It's how we get new words in the languate after all. Who knows? one of them may end up in ye olde' OED (which is no longer published in book form - more's the pity) best, sunshine
< Message edited by ParappaTheDapper -- 5/22/2011 5:17:11 AM >
_____________________________
You can't say A is made of B, or vice versa. All mass is interaction--Feynman ...and if you missed it, I'm the one who said "Just grab 'em in the biscuit"--either Feynman or Humpty Hump, I forget
|