Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread)


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 10:32:23 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PdxJ
Off hand, can you give a rough guess-timate of how many of the more experienced doms post those types of posts vs the younger, less experienced?


Absolutely no idea.  However, you don't see them nearly as often from the 'new' female Dominants.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to PdxJ)
Profile   Post #: 301
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 10:32:35 AM   
ranja


Posts: 2111
Joined: 11/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather


Not being in a position to say, I'm going to ask the women who are. Do you find there to be a psychological difference in being penetrated by something that can impregnate you and something that cannot?[/color]



yes... not to say that one is necessarily better than the other, but there is most definitely a difference about being fucked with a toy or a dick attached to a man.

and i have known of men who highly get off on spunking inside a woman and actually like to say things like "get pregnant now you bitch" while cumming
also for that reason sometimes condoms can be a hinderance, they might just take away a bit of the fun in that department.

likewise some women might want to "suck" the spunk out of the man with their pussy... so the impregnation still is not really a dominant act... it still all depends on the mindset.

(in reply to HeatherMcLeather)
Profile   Post #: 302
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 10:38:30 AM   
PdxJ


Posts: 195
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
quote:

ORIGINAL: PdxJ
Off hand, can you give a rough guess-timate of how many of the more experienced doms post those types of posts vs the younger, less experienced?

Absolutely no idea.  However, you don't see them nearly as often from the 'new' female Dominants.


That doesn't surprise me.

As far as experienced doms vs inexperienced doms, I'd bet it's less than 1 in 20.


_____________________________

Imagine what you could learn if you could learn to imagine.

the 'Official Sunny Stalker'

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 303
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 10:40:21 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
In the vast majority of cases, height is only a problem if you think it's a problem. 

I agree, though six feet is a land I've never traveled to before, which is part of the allure.

I will say that having sex with a taller, broader women (by which I mean "Amazon" breadth, not fat) provides penetration challenges, at least for me. With one woman, I couldn't make doggy style work at all, unless maybe I would have been standing on a box. I ended up getting her off by ordering her to cowgirl me. With another, I used a butt plug, a belt and my fist. No penis at all in the end game.

I didn't feel like a service top in either situation. I felt as though I was taking power of the bodies of women who had a lot of options and chose me. So that in itself is a challenge, I believe, to the simplicity of a biological explanation. Even a dominant man with a sub woman can't necesarily throw her over his shoulder and carry her back to his cave where he impregnates her from behind.

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 304
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 10:45:11 AM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PdxJ


Manipulation (ie: Mindfucking) is an extremely useful and often used method.




Manipulation comes in many forms.

Did you mean what you said? Do you stand by your words as your truth or was it a "just stirring the pot to see what bubbles to the top" kind of thing?

(in reply to PdxJ)
Profile   Post #: 305
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 10:53:07 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PdxJ

Manipulation (ie: Mindfucking) is an extremely useful and often used method.

I think we disagree on the definition of a mindfuck. To me, a mindfuck is terrifying someone into thinking you're doing something you'd never do; that that credit card edge is a blade, that the banana in that toilet is actually shit (credit to RS on that one, I've never done it myself), that there's someone else watching from the closet they've never met before who's about to come out and join in the fun.

To me, convincing some people on the internet that you're slightly stupider than you really are doesn't qualify.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to PdxJ)
Profile   Post #: 306
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 10:57:00 AM   
PdxJ


Posts: 195
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BonesFromAsh


quote:

ORIGINAL: PdxJ


Manipulation (ie: Mindfucking) is an extremely useful and often used method.




Manipulation comes in many forms.

Did you mean what you said? Do you stand by your words as your truth or was it a "just stirring the pot to see what bubbles to the top" kind of thing?


The conversation was dwindling - it needed stirred. No I don't believe it, that why I couldn't argue it further. I had no beliefs to stand on.

I may not be the most experienced person in the room but I know physical force proves nothing. Sure, you can force someone to do something by breaking their spirit (much like the argument about the horse) but to truly dominate is not to break, but to bend ones will to your own.




_____________________________

Imagine what you could learn if you could learn to imagine.

the 'Official Sunny Stalker'

(in reply to BonesFromAsh)
Profile   Post #: 307
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:01:03 AM   
CreepyStalker


Posts: 265
Joined: 2/12/2011
Status: offline 		Awww man, why did all the hilarious threads have to happen when I need to be doing other things? I'm loving the three-way trolling going on. It seems to have de-railed in the last few pages though, can we get back to posing gorgeous feminist ladies and ranting about what 'wimmin' are like? I'll start us off again if you like...

Men are deficient because they have penises, which have been replaced by modern technology (dildos, vibrators, etc.) and so are now redundant. This upsets them, so they whinge about how they're supposed to be dominant really. Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED.



(in reply to BonesFromAsh)
Profile   Post #: 308
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:01:53 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
No, penile penetration is an implicitly dominant sexual act


If penile penetration is an implicitly dominant sexual act, then so is vaginal enveloping.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 309
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:03:35 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker

Men are deficient because they have penises, which have been replaced by modern technology (dildos, vibrators, etc.) and so are now redundant. This upsets them, so they whinge about how they're supposed to be dominant really. Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED.

Boobs don't really do it for me, but if you put up the rear view of your current avatar, I will follow every post you make.

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to CreepyStalker)
Profile   Post #: 310
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:03:56 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker
no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs.


They have. It's called a tankard, and contains Smile's Best Bitter.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to CreepyStalker)
Profile   Post #: 311
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:04:56 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker
no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs.


They have. It's called a tankard, and contains Smile's Best Bitter.


Adequate? Perhaps. Superior? Naw.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 312
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:06:03 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker
Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED.
  They are as long as they're quiet.  This usually requires me to stuff something in their mouth.  Fortunately, this works out well for both of us.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to CreepyStalker)
Profile   Post #: 313
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:11:16 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker

Awww man, why did all the hilarious threads have to happen when I need to be doing other things? I'm loving the three-way trolling going on. It seems to have de-railed in the last few pages though, can we get back to posing gorgeous feminist ladies and ranting about what 'wimmin' are like? I'll start us off again if you like...

Men are deficient because they have penises, which have been replaced by modern technology (dildos, vibrators, etc.) and so are now redundant. This upsets them, so they whinge about how they're supposed to be dominant really. Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED.

Trust Me.  CBT just isn't as fun that way.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to CreepyStalker)
Profile   Post #: 314
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:12:17 AM   
CreepyStalker


Posts: 265
Joined: 2/12/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker
Women are not deficient in any way because they have boobs, and no one has yet invented an adequate replacement for boobs. Therefore women are much better than men. QED.
  They are as long as they're quiet.  This usually requires me to stuff something in their mouth.  Fortunately, this works out well for both of us.


I'll never understand male subs, what enjoyment you guys get out of buying your mistress a large and expensive chocolate gateaux is beyond me.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 315
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:13:20 AM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
If penile penetration is an implicitly dominant sexual act, then so is vaginal enveloping.


See....that just made me smile.

So, what about when a woman penetrates a man with a strap-on....is his rectal "enveloping" an equally dominant act?

Good lord, are you suggesting that these sex acts are neither dominant or submissive? I'm so confused...does someone have the rulebook????

< Message edited by BonesFromAsh -- 5/30/2011 11:16:35 AM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 316
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:20:46 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker
I'll never understand male subs, what enjoyment you guys get out of buying your mistress a large and expensive chocolate gateaux is beyond me.
I don't understand male subs either, there's a 22 page thread devoted to this very topic, although it totally petered out once I lost interest.  Quality opponents are so hard to find.

Where was I?  Oh yes, women.  Delightful creatures, total pain in the ass most of the time but useful for administering blowjobs.  Also tend to be handy in the kitchen, although that's probably not a representative sample, I've just been fortunate in that regard.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to CreepyStalker)
Profile   Post #: 317
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:22:38 AM   
PhilSlave


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/2/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker
I'll never understand male subs, what enjoyment you guys get out of buying your mistress a large and expensive chocolate gateaux is beyond me.
I don't understand male subs either, there's a 22 page thread devoted to this very topic, although it totally petered out once I lost interest.  Quality opponents are so hard to find.

Where was I?  Oh yes, women.  Delightful creatures, total pain in the ass most of the time but useful for administering blowjobs.  Also tend to be handy in the kitchen, although that's probably not a representative sample, I've just been fortunate in that regard.



They are also brilliant at cleaning and making lists.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 318
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:24:02 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline 		  Yes, and terrible at finding their keys - but I digress.....

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to PhilSlave)
Profile   Post #: 319
RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) - 5/30/2011 11:29:09 AM   
PhilSlave


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/2/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

  Yes, and terrible at finding their keys - but I digress.....


Haha, but good at finding my car keys when I leave them around and start ranting, which is a plus.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 320
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109