RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 5:40:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh, i dunno... maybe when he said...

"I made it very clear I did not send that picture, that my Twitter account had been hacked, and the prank apparently has been successful. But after hours, almost 11 hours of answering questions ... today, I'm going to have to get back to work," Weiner said.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/02/rep-weiner-struggles-to-explain-origin-lewd-twitter-photo/#ixzz1OXr0NyfB



Sily girl... what are doing presenting FACTS?!!  Stop that!!! [;)][:D]




I get that... alot!




jlf1961 -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 6:33:09 PM)

Rachel Maddow has commented on the "ick" factor of the announcement today, and also the reasons for ethics investigations, personally we should make as big a deal about this as we (liberals) have made of similar situations involving conservatives.




servantforuse -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 6:44:29 PM)

The best part of the story is Anthony's last name. It just doesn't get any better than that.




Brain -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 6:46:37 PM)

I don't agree. He's an excellent Congressman and I expect him to continue doing good work. I don't think he did anything illegal and his personal life is his business between him and his wife.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Whether he resigns or not his power is gone. Nothing he says will have any credibility.





Lucylastic -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 6:53:30 PM)

I hear beavis and butthead

You are gonna pee your pants should boehner ever get caught in a viagara fuelled oompaloompa ravagingsex story




VioletGray -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 7:17:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

Have you seen any of his interviews and debates? He argues using certifiable facts.



Ummm... no he doesn't.  His whole Goldline International attack campaign, for example, was full of lies.

Weiner Claim: Goldline is a rip off, shady outfit.
 
From the NY Times: "The Better Business Bureau has given Goldline an A+ rating"
 
Weiner Response:  That the Better Business Bureau might be guilty of fraud, accusing the BBB of accepting payment for Goldline's A+ rating.
 
*Bottom Line: Weiner is a lying weiner.

-----

Weiner Claim: Ripoff Report substantiates his allegations of Goldline being a rip off, shady outfit.
 
From Ripoff Report: The founder of Ripoff Report did an investigation on the claims about Goldline. They found the following: "Consumers can feel confident and secure when doing business with Goldline International... They provide extensive free information to help people make informed choices when buying precious metals... feel confident & secure when doing business with Goldline International... Goldline International has made every effort over the past few months to deal with any client issues that might arise. Because of our efforts and those of Goldline International, Rip-off Report is confident in giving Goldline a positive rating... Rip-off Report comfortably states that you can be completely confident, safe and secure when doing business with them"

Weiner Response:  Silence to his OWN source's refuting his allegation.
 
*Bottom Line: Weiner is a lying weiner.


Weiner has neither "certifiable facts" or credibility... he's just a lying weiner -- and the current issue exemplifies this.





Most of those points Congressman Weiner already answered during his direct showdown with the Sith Lord of Goldline here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4cK9_ntJjI&feature=related




Kirata -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 7:49:21 PM)


If you don't mind me combining a few of your posts...

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Another Breitbart lie. Please show me that no one is so damn stupid as to fall for this stuff again.

The entire thing was debunked... The right wingers are just trying to pretend they aren't caught again.

Breitbart's cronies made it up but you suckers keep puching it.


[image]http://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/eat-crow.jpg[/image]

K.




SternSkipper -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 8:07:02 PM)

quote:

Ridiculous statement, my friend. First, let me correct you, much of the bailout money and tarp money went to liberal CEO's like Geoffrey Imelt of GE and for the benefit of the UAW (which was also to the detriment of the bondholders) of GM and Chrysler. OK?

Yeah right, AIG Bear Stearns, CitiBank they just got little teeny portions... right.... And of course your theory is of course supported by the political donations made in last year's mid term elections:

http://www.latestbusinessnews.org/companies-that-received-bailout-money-giving-generously-to-candidates/99649/

If what you put fourth in YOUR RIDICULOUS CLAIM were true, it would logically that all those bailout recipients would have flooded the coffers of the democrats. But that didn't happen.
   And you're not reading time, businessweek, wall street journal; and many other significant publications monitoring buisness practices in the US  because all of them have recently run articles speaking to EXACTLY what I said about their hiring practices.
And oddly, the people who literally dive in to call the people who have endured long term employment lazy, talentless, and bad risks and any other label they can place on a person to justify the practice. In fact, they sound just like you did in your first remarks regarding entitlement.

  But I am glad you applaud me for doing my part. Having the support of those who sit in front of the glowing cube doing nothing besides bitching makes it so much easier when I am wrangling through the process of paying the self-employment tax, feeding my kids, while trying to figure out what neo-con FUCKS are going to call an 'entitlement' and try and slash next like my children's humble public school education. I am frankly more worried about what that philosophy of stiffs is doing to locally harm my kids' future than the national picture. The local jackasses who regurgitate talk radio dogma don't look any different when they show up bitching about school funding. I see who they are and how strongly they come out to demonstrate a disregard for the fundamental building blocks of the future.

quote:

But I will also tell you this, there is not one-fucking-red-cent that you or anyone else on this board has paid to contribute to my day to day living expenses.  And that is how it should be for all of us that are able bodied with IQ's that fall within the normal median of the bell curve.


You're sure about that IQ thing right? Not only did I even vaguely imply I or anyone else was supporting you. That's just plain weird.





SternSkipper -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 8:08:07 PM)

quote:

If you don't mind me combining a few of your posts..


Waiter... take this crow back, I expressly said Poached.
[8D]




SternSkipper -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 8:12:15 PM)

quote:

You are gonna pee your pants should boehner ever get caught in a viagara fuelled oompaloompa ravagingsex story


Can hardly wait for that video of Boner in the lobby of the Holiday Inn in Columbus in his piss-soaked underwear crying his eyes out begging his mistress to give him just a few free lashes




tazzygirl -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 8:55:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

I don't agree. He's an excellent Congressman and I expect him to continue doing good work. I don't think he did anything illegal and his personal life is his business between him and his wife.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Whether he resigns or not his power is gone. Nothing he says will have any credibility.




A Congressman claimed his account had been hacked, with the potential for police to get involved. No one bought his story... well, I didnt buy it. Those pictures were his personal property, until he put them out there on the net, making them public property. I still wouldnt have thought anything of it, its still between him and his wife.

Then the accusations started. What if those other photos had not come to light? Who would have been dragged through the mud for this... convenient excuse? It took 9 days to come up with the truth???




tazzygirl -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 8:58:21 PM)

quote:

But I will also tell you this, there is not one-fucking-red-cent that you or anyone else on this board has paid to contribute to my day to day living expenses.  And that is how it should be for all of us that are able bodied with IQ's that fall within the normal median of the bell curve.


you went to private school?




WyldHrt -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 9:04:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain
I don't agree. He's an excellent Congressman and I expect him to continue doing good work. I don't think he did anything illegal and his personal life is his business between him and his wife.
quote:

Whether he resigns or not his power is gone. Nothing he says will have any credibility.

I'll say the same thing here that I said to my Dad when the Clinton thing happened. I would have respected the guy if he had simply said something along the lines of, "It's a private matter and none of your fucking business".

I don't really care that he gets his rocks off exchanging pics or whatever, but I do care that he hemmed, hawed, and outright lied about it right up until he was well and truly busted.




tazzygirl -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 9:06:37 PM)

Its not only that, Wyld. How many people viewed those photos who may not have wanted too?

How many were minors?




MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 9:13:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

Have you seen any of his interviews and debates? He argues using certifiable facts.



Ummm... no he doesn't.  His whole Goldline International attack campaign, for example, was full of lies.

Weiner Claim: Goldline is a rip off, shady outfit.
 
From the NY Times: "The Better Business Bureau has given Goldline an A+ rating"
 
Weiner Response:  That the Better Business Bureau might be guilty of fraud, accusing the BBB of accepting payment for Goldline's A+ rating.
 
*Bottom Line: Weiner is a lying weiner.

-----

Weiner Claim: Ripoff Report substantiates his allegations of Goldline being a rip off, shady outfit.
 
From Ripoff Report: The founder of Ripoff Report did an investigation on the claims about Goldline. They found the following: "Consumers can feel confident and secure when doing business with Goldline International... They provide extensive free information to help people make informed choices when buying precious metals... feel confident & secure when doing business with Goldline International... Goldline International has made every effort over the past few months to deal with any client issues that might arise. Because of our efforts and those of Goldline International, Rip-off Report is confident in giving Goldline a positive rating... Rip-off Report comfortably states that you can be completely confident, safe and secure when doing business with them"

Weiner Response:  Silence to his OWN source's refuting his allegation.
 
*Bottom Line: Weiner is a lying weiner.


Weiner has neither "certifiable facts" or credibility... he's just a lying weiner -- and the current issue exemplifies this.





Most of those points Congressman Weiner already answered during his direct showdown with the Sith Lord of Goldline here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4cK9_ntJjI&feature=related



Respectfully, he didn't answer squat... just more of the same unfounded, factually inaccurate nonsense. 

Why you insist on defending this complete ass-hat of a PROVEN LIAR is beyond me.  Put your politics aside... if this was someone on the other side of the fence, would you be defending them to the grave?  No.  So don't play the partisan game.  The guy is a PROVEN LIAR, and a scum-bag to boot.  Put the politics aside.  That fuck-knob Larry Craig was just as big an ass-hat, as is/was Arnold Schwarzenegger.






SexyBossyBBW -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 9:30:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Uhhhhh so he doesnt remember taking pics in his underwear? Riiiiiggggghhhhhht.
Not only did he inherit the Biggest Scumbag in Congress crown from Grayson, he's a horrible liar. (Unless he was so drunk or stoned he blacked out, in the great tradition of Teddie Kennedy).
This is very invigorating info huh? That was a sexy pic, from what I've heard.

Anthony Weiner played sexy guy online. Isn't he like all of us here? It's his and the wife's problem. Not a case for the state to worry about, IMO. Phucking the state=problem; jerking off to online pics=not so much a national problem.
But, if this is your viagra, who am I to call you unreasonable>?! M




MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 9:38:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SexyBossyBBW

Isn't he like all of us here?



Do you lie about your BDSM interests and activities?  I'd venture a guess you absolutely don't!!!  Weiner-boi lied about his escapades.  Worse, given he's in a position of power (just like AAAAAAAAARNOLD), by engaging in this type of activity, he leaves himself (and ultimately the Taxpayers he represents) vulnerable to blackmail in order to protect his many indiscretions.







willbeurdaddy -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 9:39:33 PM)

What part of "scumbag LIAR" don't you understand? And a bad one at that. Even TG saw through it from the first time the ferret was asked about it.




Owner59 -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 9:41:26 PM)

It wasn`t that big a deal. A pic of a station-wagon in his briefs.

If he had sad yeah it`s me (winks at the ladies) and said it was a mistake,sorry,etc., it would be yesterday`s news.

The lying and weasel words are another issue.

My gut feeling is the leadership will ask him to quit over that.

David Vitter is still in office,........ last I heard.......[8|]




Marini -> RE: Weener cant say if the pic is him or not (6/6/2011 10:09:35 PM)

This press conference Weener had today was bizzaro.

Weener seems to have a terrible memory for an elected official, I hope he has not forgotten to tell us any more details.

In this day and age, can someone tell me why men are so careless and stupid?

I mean he did some of this on a twitter page, that in fact states that he is a Congressman?
[sm=abducted.gif]

I have more respect for Clinton, because he did what he did 15 or more years ago, hasn't Weener learned from his predecessors?

Weener is guilty of being careless and stupid most of all.

I don't think he HAS to step down, let the people that elected him make the decision.




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875