xssve
Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009 Status: offline
|
Well, I think yo need to explore the differences - when it comes to physical factors, male and female are very different, so how you view male vs. female dominance is going to depend on how you weight the physical variable - there are other variables however, and when it comes to psychological dominance, the differences are less easy to distinguish, and may be erased entirely - the brain doesn't have any muscles, and it has no sex organs. Typically, males in general tend to stress their physical attributes initially, women tend to use emotional manipulation - if anything, I see that being less the case in BDSM than in the general population, i.e., there is a lot more thought being put into the nuances - even in a ritualized form like Gorean, where a lot of weight is placed on the physical variable, and expectations are clearly spelled out. Perhaps because physical dominance has it's limits - relationships based on continual physical dominance alone often barely qualify as relationships, and they tend to be fairly static, i.e., growth is often the result of interaction, give and take, negotiation, etc. - all of which happens when the physical factor ceases to be a major factor - typically, dominance patterns will tend to diversify - men have often fallen back on financial coercion historically, while emotional manipulation continues not only to work for women, but has historically, often been the only option. Anyway, not experience, just a disclaimer concerning the other thread, but it does reflect my anecdotal experience, i.e., what I've seen and experienced, most of which reflects average vanilla, not BDSM behavior. And, I find the politics just get in the way for me - me Tarzan, you Jane, works for me, but Lady H's gender blending synergy is for me, taking it to the next level - it's more like a religious experience, and I like to hit all the levels at one point or other.
|