RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo

RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

willbeurdaddy -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 9:24:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery House Republicans rode into the majority on campaign promises to “focus on jobs.” And the best way to focus on jobs is to reduce the deficit, which HAS been their focus.

Sanity -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 9:26:52 AM)
Your link is to a far left website that just repeats the same shrill lie without offering any real support for the claim. None that I found, I followed one link that purported to show some evidence that Republicans promise d government jobs or whatever and it went to a totally unrelated "Meet the Press" interview about the Gulf oil spill... Got anything that isnt pure bullshit? quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery House Republicans rode into the majority on campaign promises to “focus on jobs.”

juliaoceania -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 9:31:59 AM)
Are you claiming that the Republicans did not run on a jobs platform?

Sanity -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 9:35:32 AM)
I am claiming that reality dictates that it is the private sector that creates wealth and that government steals and destroys wealth There may be some Republicans who are fiscally irresponsible and who dont understand that its a fantasy that "government jobs" help the economy but thats the exact kind of thinking that got us where we are today. If government jobs and "stimulus spending" (deficit spending) made the country prosper we should be booming right now, like weve never been before quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Are you claiming that the Republicans did not run on a jobs platform?

Edwynn -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 9:42:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery House Republicans rode into the majority on campaign promises to “focus on jobs.” And the best way to focus on jobs is to reduce the deficit, which HAS been their focus. So then, how's that ultimate deficit-reducing cut in billions dollars of subsidies to oil and agro-chem coming along there? Those guys are just all over it, are they not? Straight-up, honest, mean-what-they say kinda fellahs, no question. I'm sure that the proposal of more tax cuts to the wealthiest is a mere case of 'math dyslexia,' where they take that as reducing the deficit. I'm actually not seeing much of the 'focus' alluded to in the above post, but you're welcome to fill us out here.

juliaoceania -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 9:49:24 AM)
quote: I am claiming that reality dictates that it is the private sector that creates wealth and that government steals and destroys wealth There may be some Republicans who are fiscally irresponsible and who dont understand that its a fantasy that "government jobs" help the economy but thats the exact kind of thinking that got us where we are today. The last paragraph quote: Boehner, however, said his priority was job creation: "I think the American people want us to focus on their message during the election: stop the spending, get rid of the uncertainty. Let's get around to creating jobs again." Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20021868-503544.html#ixzz1P54Gf1cb http://thehill.com/homenews/house/109253-boehner-impose-ban-on-federal-regulations Boehner: Impose ban on federal regulations to spur job creation quote: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/minority-leader-john-boehner-speaker-house/story?id=11221476 "The election is going to be a referendum on job-killing policies that are coming out of this administration and our colleagues across aisle," Boehner said. "We've lost more than three million jobs since the stimulus bill was signed into law. Americans are sick and tired of spending, spending, spending, and not seeing any jobs as a result." I could find many left wing articles that asked "how are you going to create jobs?" Which he never really answered, but the point is he did promise it, and he didn't deliver. He just obstructed Since he is the most powerful republican in the country today, I think his words are the most important. He has been in the position to compromise with the Obama Admin and the Senate, and he has made no headway because he just wanted to obstruct. Here is the thing, our government is broken, it is obstruction and cronyism all the way, and we are sliding off the cliff This happened in the first depression, Hoover lost because he wouldn't do anything, and then FDR took over... there was a backlash against the New Deal, such as the SCOTUS repealing New Deal legislation, but then it got on track again, and people were helped. We need a New Deal

Musicmystery -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:01:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery House Republicans rode into the majority on campaign promises to “focus on jobs.” And the best way to focus on jobs is to reduce the deficit, which HAS been their focus. I agree with everything up to the comma. Their focus has been to take advantage of the situation to push their repeal agenda in pieces. If they (or anyone else) wants to get serious about addressing the deficit, it will require: cutting defense adjusting social security (small changes) overhauling medicaid/medicare, especially in conjunction with realistic universal health care raising some taxes along with spending cuts. Nothing short of this is going to bring down the deficit.

Musicmystery -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:02:50 AM)
quote: the government should just hire everybody and pay us all a thousands dollars an hour. That would solve every economic problem weve ever had to deal with. OMG! He's uncovered the secret plan!!! [:'(]

Sanity -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:03:03 AM)
You made my point for me julia, thank you. The job creation promised was via reducing government thereby enabling the private sector. Again, if government spending actually spurred economic growth we should all be living in economic heaven by now.

Musicmystery -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:03:58 AM)
quote: Again, if government spending actually spurred economic growth we should all be living in economic heaven by now. And that, friends, was and is the problem with Reaganomics and all similar approaches from any party. Borrowing and spending is a short term strategy. But it has long term consequences.

mnottertail -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:08:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: Again, if government spending actually spurred economic growth we should all be living in economic heaven by now. And that, friends, was and is the problem with Reaganomics. And with W. Rather than spend on infrastructure and education and health and those things that make for a good business climate and progress they spent on war materiel and war, sure quick boost to the economy, everybody turning out war parts, tons and tons of steel being thrown at Iraqis, but it peters out real quick because it is a one way sinkhole.

Edwynn -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:13:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity You made my point for me julia, thank you. The job creation promised was via reducing government thereby enabling the private sector. Again, if government spending actually spurred economic growth we should all be living in economic heaven by now. You have taken great pleasure in proving here repeatedly that you cannot understand the meaning of even two words in succession, much less anything resembling fact. How you could conlude that another post has "made my point" would require a bit more elucidation than mere statement of such. In any case, government spending has certainly put the Koch Bros. and ExxonMobil and Citigroup and a slew of defense contractors in economic heaven, which is what you argue for more of repeatedly, insisting that we take even more from the poor and middle class to increase the Treasury payout to those good honest corporations. So, are you saying that as a complaint or a compliment?

Musicmystery -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:19:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: Again, if government spending actually spurred economic growth we should all be living in economic heaven by now. And that, friends, was and is the problem with Reaganomics. And with W. Rather than spend on infrastructure and education and health and those things that make for a good business climate and progress they spent on war materiel and war, sure quick boost to the economy, everybody turning out war parts, tons and tons of steel being thrown at Iraqis, but it peters out real quick because it is a one way sinkhole. Agreed. If we were spending on investments, that would be preferable.

mnottertail -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:23:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: Again, if government spending actually spurred economic growth we should all be living in economic heaven by now. And that, friends, was and is the problem with Reaganomics. And with W. Rather than spend on infrastructure and education and health and those things that make for a good business climate and progress they spent on war materiel and war, sure quick boost to the economy, everybody turning out war parts, tons and tons of steel being thrown at Iraqis, but it peters out real quick because it is a one way sinkhole. Agreed. If we were spending on investments, that would be preferable. Interestingly enough, with infrastructure and landgrant colleges and waterway improvements and so on, those were fairly sacred founding principles of the Republican party, and that's why I say that other than you and me, I am not to sure that there are any real republicans out here.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:28:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery House Republicans rode into the majority on campaign promises to “focus on jobs.” And the best way to focus on jobs is to reduce the deficit, which HAS been their focus. I agree with everything up to the comma. Their focus has been to take advantage of the situation to push their repeal agenda in pieces. If they (or anyone else) wants to get serious about addressing the deficit, it will require: cutting defense adjusting social security (small changes) overhauling medicaid/medicare, especially in conjunction with realistic universal health care raising some taxes along with spending cuts. Nothing short of this is going to bring down the deficit. Guess what...the Ryan plan has all of those features.

juliaoceania -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:29:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity You made my point for me julia, thank you. The job creation promised was via reducing government thereby enabling the private sector. Again, if government spending actually spurred economic growth we should all be living in economic heaven by now. Tell that to all those republicans that are going to be running in their districts on those promises that never manifested themselves. And many of those people are on unemployment that is getting ready to run out, if it hasn't already. I predict loses for the Republicans in the House in 2012... when you are unemployed, or are related to people on unemployment, and the Republicans are standing in your way of a job or an unemployment check, you tend to be a "motivated voter"

mnottertail -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:29:29 AM)
no, it does not. that simple.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:32:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I predict loses for the Republicans in the House in 2012... Wanna bet?

juliaoceania -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:43:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I predict loses for the Republicans in the House in 2012... Wanna bet? With actions like these, I can pretty much guarantee it http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/164947-house-republicans-propose-social-security-opt-out quote: House Republicans on Friday introduced legislation that would allow workers to partially opt out of Social Security immediately, and fully opt out after 15 years. Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas), who chairs the National Republican Congressional Committee, and several other Republicans introduced the Savings Account for Every American (SAFE) Act. Under the bill, workers would immediately have 6.2 percent of their wages sent to a "SAFE" account each year. That would take the place of the 6.2 percent the workers now contributed to Social Security. Another 6.2% is sent to Social Security by employers. Under the Sessions bill, employers would continue to make this matching contribution to Social Security, but after 15 years, employers could also send that amount to the employee's SAFE account. You do realize how that is going to play to the senior citizens who vote in most elections? Not well, I can tell you that. Now of course, democrats seem determined to grasp defeat from the jaws of victory, so they may not effectively capitalize on it, so you maybe right, it won't make a difference But, maybe, just maybe, they might get their collective heads out of their asses and explain to people how the Republican party is trying to kill medicare and social security... and privatize it for Wall Street

Edwynn -> RE: The Disgusting Record of o'Dumbo (6/12/2011 10:46:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery raising some taxes along with spending cuts. Nothing short of this is going to bring down the deficit. Guess what...the Ryan plan has all of those features. Oh really? Raising some taxes? I must have missed that one. BTW, how's those subsidy cuts coming along there, Willbe? Gettin' serious* here, huh?

Page: << < prev 11 12 [13] 14 15 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875