LafayetteLady -> RE: When A Dog Pack Attacks (Graphic Bloody Photos) (6/11/2011 9:12:19 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: barelynangel I hate to say it but the irresponsible dog owner is the one refuses to recognize the very REAL possibility that their breed is one that has major instincts to attack or whatever its defined as. Caustion and realization and prevention are three things that make a responsible owner of these types of breeds. If you have an owner oblivious to the possible risk, that to me is when a dog is dangerous. Being in denial is not a sign of a responsible owner. I am not saying get rid of or shoot down a pit, i am saying if you own one, don't make excuses for the breed, simply be aware and recognize the breed has a very real tendency to be vicious. Doesn't mean your dog will be, it means by being aware, you may actually prevent your dog from becoming one in the statistics. Sanity, i hope your animals are okay. I am editing this to ad when i speak of an owner knowing the breed, i speak of any breed. I am not one for regulating or getting rid of pits, but as an owner, you should be aware and acknowlege the statitstics as any breed owner should. Knowledge is the first power of prevention for any breed owner. angel Given your job, it is not illogical that you would make such a comment. It is, however, irresponsible and completely lacking in knowledge of dogs. Let's face it, any number of people here could, and have, posted web sites contradicting what your site suggests. Of course, the difference is a huge one. It is called reality vs. the legal argument. The legal argument ethically should include the other quoted sites that defend these "vicious" breeds. Of course that is only if you are good at writing a legal brief. Quite honestly, your ability there is in serious question in my opinion. You are completely correct in suggesting the actions that the OP take. In EVERY state, the owner of the dog is responsible for the dog's actions. Humans are naturally higher in the food chain than dogs, cattle, horses, cats, whatever. If you are going to own a pet, each state has laws that dictate what responsibilities the owner has, whether it be leash laws, fencing your property or muzzling your animal. There are not breeds that are more "naturally vicious." That's pure ignorance. As you say, knowledge is power. You don't train a toy poodle, the same way you train a doberman or a pit bull. Each breed has its strengths and weaknesses and just like humans, need to be trained in different ways. I currently live in a house with a pit bull, two German Shepards, two Poodles, a Beagle, a Shitzu/Maltese and two Chinese Cresteds. There are also nine cats (ten when you include mine). The most "vicious" of the NINETEEN animals? The male poodle and the Shitzu mix, then there is a male cat who I fostered as an infant and bottle fed who literally screams at me whenever I walk by. The pit bull? She's a big baby and knows she is "low man on the totem pole" of the dogs being the youngest and the newest. Know how many dog fights we have every day with this "pack" of animals? ZERO. Why? Because the animals have been taught, each according to its breed, that such behavior is not tolerated. Statistics are wonderous things. I am by no means an expert at statistics, but you give me any set of "statistical" data and I can spin it to say that pit bulls are the most vicious animals on earth or the most gentle. That's the beauty of statistics. They are essentially mythical analysis displaying only what the analyst wants you to see. Why do we not see a whole bunch of other breeds in so many of these statistics? Because the data that is used is only the reported data, and most people aren't reporting about the breeds that they don't have a hard on about regulating. To say that people like Wyldhrt and others who have spent actual time working with these breeds, training them, rescuing them from irresponsible owners are deluding themselves about the reality of the breed is nothing more than a show of pure ignorance, pompously being presented as fact by someone far to deluded to recognize reality.
|
|
|
|