DePubed
Posts: 71
Joined: 6/23/2009 Status: offline
|
A straight Master can own a gay slave, and a gay Master can own a straight slave. Why not? If a Straight Master wanted to have gay male slaves so that they would shine his shoes, cook his food, do his laundry, and for other housework and chores, why not? I guess the issue for most in this group is the sexual focus. If a straight Master has NO sexual focus on their gay slave, but simply wishes to own a gay slave to serve him financially and in labor, why not. The fact that, in order to put the slave into the right headspace the slave does his chores in the nude wearing only a locked collar, or that the gay slave is kept locked into a chastity device, is just part of the tools of the trade. For many people, the master/slave dynamic is solely about being a sexual Master or sexual slave. These people only 'play' at the roles when they are in organized 'play spaces' and clubs. But for someone who makes use of their home to be a Master, that man may wish to have male slaves to wash his car, etc. He doesnt care if the slave is gay or straight, young or old. I actually think that a straight Woman (Mistress/Dominatrix) could own GAY male slaves so that they could cut her lawn, paint her house, fix her roof, etc. why not, if the slavery is about ownership and non-sexual service?
|