Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Forced Bi


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> Forced Bi Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 12:54:38 PM   
kickable


Posts: 47
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
Hello,
I'm interested in hearing views of people on whether forced bi is actually forced.
I've seen discussions elsewhere with a variety of opinions.
I'm particilarly interested in hearing from Dominant Women.
In previous discussions, some of the Mistresses say nothing is forced. There is no such thing as forced bi. Yet, the definition of forced is to impose by coercion or power. Certainly, a Dominatrix exerts coercion and power.
Furthermore, every Dominatrix I've ever met has asked if I'm bi. When I say no, they have often told me they don't believe me. Some say there is no possibility of a personal relationship unless I become bi. Yet, these are the same who say there is no such thing as forced bi.
Perhaps it's just a difference of understanding of the word "forced." Certainly, if bi is something I don't want, but I want to continue a relationship with a Dominatrix and I give in to training, there is an element of force even though it's a free will choice.
Frankly, bi isn't something I want. But if I was ever to accept a relationship with a Dominatrix who insisted on my being bi, she would have to accept the notion that she forced me to be bi. In fact, I'd like her to be proud of forcing me.
Ok, thanks for reading. I'm ready for your thoughts.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 1:35:52 PM   
BendingGender


Posts: 176
Joined: 1/15/2007
Status: offline
Speaking only for myself, I don't believe that sexual inclination is a choice for the majority of people. Some people may decide to try being in a relationship with someone of the same gender if they've been repeatedly burned by members of the opposite gender. And I'm not just talking about someone who gets cheated on a lot. Or someone who just can't seem to maintain a relationship for more than a few weeks/months at a time because they jump into bed with people they find physically attractive, but deficient in many other, more important ways. I'm talking about someone who has had the shit beaten out of them over and over again. Or someone who has been ground into a pulp by psychological manipulation from abusive partners. Conversely, not everyone will make that jump. Some people keep an "Assholes Welcome" sign above the revolving door of their personal life. Some people end up in the morgue because they never get out. And lastly, some people wise up and start making better spousal choices.

That said, and returning to my original statement, if I don't believe that sexual "preference" is a choice I wouldn't seek to make that decision for another. I'm okay with accepting the fact that my submissives and/or slaves may not want to interact with each other sexually. As long as they want to interact with me on that level I don't really give a crap beyond that point. If they're bi-curious, or genuinely bisexual, I will admit that I would be inclined to tailor a fantasy in which one or both of them are engaging in "forced bi" with the knowledge that neither of them is being put into a position that could damage some part of them. Otherwise, it's just not something I'd be interested in doing.  

_____________________________

Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. ~Andre Gide
The future influences the present just as much as the past. ~Friedrich Nietzsche
Atheism is a non-prophet organization. ~George Carlin (RIP)

(in reply to kickable)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 3:32:23 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
Kickable,

There have been a number of threads on this subject recently, including this one, which may actually qualify as the longest thread on this forum, ever. This may explain why people don't have the energy to respond to your OP at present.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to kickable)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 3:52:03 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
Well, you know unless you really do have no choice because you are tied up and unable to leave and then you get raped, it's not forced - if it is truly forced it's rape and a crime.

In a lifestyle setting you got the chance to leave, it might cost you the relationship but you do have a choice, in a professional setting, err, I doubt anybody will try to upset a paying customer who said it is a hard limit - if it is not a hard limit, well then it's not very forced....

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 7:16:50 PM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
Whether it is forced or not depends on the situation.

Some subs do wish for bisexual activity but societal pressures against sex with other men push them to shift responsibility onto someone else.

Some subs do not enjoy the activity in itself (they would not seek it elsewhere if they could, even if anonymously) but enjoy the submission or subservience they find in being ordered to do something they would otherwise not do or perhaps find unpleasant.

quote:

Some say there is no possibility of a personal relationship unless I become bi.


It is a world of possibilities:

1. Romantic, monogamous relationship with a domme
2. An open relationship with a domme where she plays with other people on her own time
3. Submission to a female couple
4. Submission to a woman where sexual activity is not had
5. Submission to a woman where sexual activity is not had with other men

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 7:28:58 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
There are a lot of ways to look at the 'forced' part.

Some dynamics include the concept of consent/non consent.  Meaning, you make the choice to consent to be in the dynamic or not.  If you don't want to obey, you leave.  You may not want to engage in that same gender sexual activity, but if you don't the dynamic is over.  Is that coercion?  That has everything to do with if that is the situation that you signed up for. 

Other people like to engage in role play, where the scene has a pretend element of being forced, even though it is something that they really want to do.  It can feel real, but the underlying truth is that it's a form of role play.

No offense, OP, but I have to wonder a bit about just how many Dominant women you've met in real life.  This does happen to be one of My kinks, but even I would think it would be rather crude to ask *every* submissive male that I ever happened to meet if they were bisexual or open to hetero-flexible situations.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 8:00:57 PM   
Back2theFuture


Posts: 183
Joined: 4/19/2011
Status: offline
Definition of Force:

a. Power made operative against resistance; exertion: use force in driving a nail.b. The use of physical power or violence to compel or restrain: a confession obtained by force.

From many of the profiles I have read of Subs wanting forced Bi, it seem more like something they want to try themselves. So that doesn't really constitute "force". Many of them are just using the guise of "force" to stay in denial of latent homosexual tendencies.

I am straight(despite the impressions my submissive attitude may give)  and am not interested in any thing with another guy, so a Domme would have to use actual force which I would not be ok with and would immediately say no to, refuse or use a safeword(THERE IS NONE! ) a SSC Domme would then respect my limits.
Anything else would be criminal.

So as we can really see the concept of "Forced" Bi is misnomer if not oxymoronic.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 8:37:16 PM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
This does happen to be one of My kinks, but even I would think it would be rather crude to ask *every* submissive male that I ever happened to meet if they were bisexual or open to hetero-flexible situations.


I think most dommes would hold a similar perspective. Some, however, think differently.

I recall a recent discussion where a domme tried to pressure a sub into engaging in bisexual activity. She used emotional blackmail to convince him to try it. When he said he could not do it at time of the arranged scene, she turned cold on him. He came to forums for advice and people told him to move on.

Other points that come to mind are profiles which say from the outset that they do not care what the submissive's orientation is, she will have her subs engage in bisexual activity.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Back2theFuture
So as we can really see the concept of "Forced" Bi is misnomer if not oxymoronic.


Let's imagine a guy who finds it a turn-on to be ordered to lick a toilet. I doubt that he finds joy in what he feels when he licks the toilet itself on his own--that is, he would unlikely lick the toilet on his own at home. What makes this activity attractive to him is that it represents submission and humiliation for being ordered to do something he would consider unpleasant. The same could apply to forced bi.

That he enjoys being ordered or forced to do something he otherwise would not want to do does not mean that the activity is not forced. Otherwise, one would not be able to describe consensual submission as submission.

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to Back2theFuture)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 8:43:02 PM   
Back2theFuture


Posts: 183
Joined: 4/19/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea

Let's imagine a guy who finds it a turn-on to be ordered to lick a toilet. I doubt that he finds joy in what he feels when he licks the toilet itself on his own--that is, he would unlikely lick the toilet on his own at home. What makes this activity attractive to him is that it represents submission and humiliation for being ordered to do something he would consider unpleasant. The same could apply to forced bi.

That he enjoys being ordered or forced to do something he otherwise would not want to do does not mean that the activity is not forced. Otherwise, one would not be able to describe consensual submission as submission.



I don't disagree with you on this. I completely understand, but calling it "Forced" is while the most simplistic thing to do it is inaccurate, as there is some form of consent to it as with all submission.

A more accurate terminology would be "Pseudo-forced Bi".

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 11:37:24 PM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Back2theFuture
I completely understand, but calling it "Forced" is while the most simplistic thing to do it is inaccurate, as there is some form of consent to it as with all submission.

A more accurate terminology would be "Pseudo-forced Bi".


I think the point about whether consent negates the concept of force is fuzzy.

First, I don't think forcing someone requires physical power--the threat of unpleasant consequences, whether physical or not, which compel action also constitute forced behavior.

A secondary may force out of bounds a running back of a football team trying to come from behind in the closing minutes of a game not for physical fear of being tackled but for fear of clock continuing to run. A judge may force a party to comply not for fear of physical harm but for fear of some other unwanted consequence such as disallowing a given type of evidence.

Therefore, a sub complying with an order given by a domme to do activity x may still be forced even if physical force is not immediately used. This compliance could be driven by fear of unwanted consequence.

Thus, simply because a sub complies without use of physical force does not mean he is not being forced.

Next, let us consider a scenario where the compliance or submission (compliance is one form of submission) is enthusiastic. If the enthusiasm to comply is for sake of symbolizing submission, versus for sake of enjoying the activity for sake of that specific activity, then I think it is still compliance and submission. Enthusiasm to be submissive does not negate submission. I define submission to be behavior that is characterized by acts that are one or more of the following: obedient, deferential, appeasing, or capitulating. The disciple of a Buddhist Guru is still submissive to the guru even if this submission is given enthusiastically. A submissive who is obedient, deferential, appeasing, or capitulating is still submissive even if submission brings him arousal.

If doing something one is told to do and liking it means we must put a word pseudo before it, then consensual submission is pseudo submission--even if it consists of acts that are obedient, deferential, appeasing and capitulating--and you and I are pseudo submissives.

I see your point that there is some difference between enthusiasm for a particular form of submission, and submission without the enthusiasm. At a broad level this distinction is made by consent. Thus we have consensual submission and non-consensual submission, and consensual forced Bi versus non-consensual forced Bi. If the non-consensual forced bi is part of a consensual non-consent dynamic (versus, say, prison ;-) ), then it becomes a mouthful: consensual non-consensual forced Bi ;-)

Within consent, one can make further distinctions with respect to enthusiasm, neutral feeling, or distaste for an activity done under compliance by a submissive. This distinction is seeking to discern not between submission or lack of submission, but between points on a continuum that spans D/s with and D/s without emotional SM. By emotional SM I mean the desire for a struggle or emotional discomfort, just like physical SM seeks to create physical discomfort. So I agree that there is something that distinguishes the two scenarios but I don't think that entity is whether it is forced.

Cheers,

Sea

< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 6/14/2011 11:48:45 PM >

(in reply to Back2theFuture)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 11:45:35 PM   
HeatherMcLeather


Posts: 2559
Joined: 5/21/2011
From: The dog house
Status: offline
quote:

Well, you know unless you really do have no choice because you are tied up and unable to leave and then you get raped, it's not forced
Technically yes. but in practice not always. I am not bi at all. I'm darn near phallophobic (I know I have issues, but they are rational and being worked on). But one of the questions I asked when we started out was on this very point. And yes, if Hanners decides I am to have sex with a guy, I will do it. It will be done under duress, and against my will. Technically I am consenting so it isn't forced, but it is forced. I am forced by the agreement we made. My sense of honour and duty will force me to comply with her wishes no matter how much I do not want to do so, in order to not break my word.


(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Forced Bi - 6/14/2011 11:56:48 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea
I think most dommes would hold a similar perspective. Some, however, think differently.

I recall a recent discussion where a domme tried to pressure a sub into engaging in bisexual activity. She used emotional blackmail to convince him to try it. When he said he could not do it at time of the arranged scene, she turned cold on him. He came to forums for advice and people told him to move on.


Correct.  Unless I'm mistaken, this is the same OP.




_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Forced Bi - 6/15/2011 12:36:30 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Correct.  Unless I'm mistaken, this is the same OP.


There are probably 10 threads that fit the description I gave ;-)

The one I had in mind is this one: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3643297/mpage_1/tm.htm

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Forced Bi - 6/15/2011 12:36:52 AM   
Back2theFuture


Posts: 183
Joined: 4/19/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea

I think the point about whether consent negates the concept of force is fuzzy.

First, I don't think forcing someone requires physical power--the threat of unpleasant consequences, whether physical or not, which compel action also constitute forced behavior.

A secondary may force out of bounds a running back of a football team trying to come from behind in the closing minutes of a game not for physical fear of being tackled but for fear of clock continuing to run. A judge may force a party to comply not for fear of physical harm but for fear of some other unwanted consequence such as disallowing a given type of evidence.

Therefore, a sub complying with an order given by a domme to do activity x may still be forced even if physical force is not immediately used. This compliance could be driven by fear of unwanted consequence.

Thus, simply because a sub complies without use of physical force does not mean he is not being forced.

Next, let us consider a scenario where the compliance or submission (compliance is one form of submission) is enthusiastic. If the enthusiasm to comply is for sake of symbolizing submission, versus for sake of enjoying the activity for sake of that specific activity, then I think it is still compliance and submission. Enthusiasm to be submissive does not negate submission. I define submission to be behavior that is characterized by acts that are one or more of the following: obedient, deferential, appeasing, or capitulating. The disciple of a Buddhist Guru is still submissive to the guru even if this submission is given enthusiastically. A submissive who is obedient, deferential, appeasing, or capitulating is still submissive even if submission brings him arousal.

If doing something one is told to do and liking it means we must put a word pseudo before it, then consensual submission is pseudo submission--even if it consists of acts that are obedient, deferential, appeasing and capitulating--and you and I are pseudo submissives.

I see your point that there is some difference between enthusiasm for a particular form of submission, and submission without the enthusiasm. At a broad level this distinction is made by consent. Thus we have consensual submission and non-consensual submission, and consensual forced Bi versus non-consensual forced Bi. If the non-consensual forced bi is part of a consensual non-consent dynamic (versus, say, prison ;-) ), then it becomes a mouthful: consensual non-consensual forced Bi ;-)

Within consent, one can make further distinctions with respect to enthusiasm, neutral feeling, or distaste for an activity done under compliance by a submissive. This distinction is seeking to discern not between submission or lack of submission, but between points on a continuum that spans D/s with and D/s without emotional SM. By emotional SM I mean the desire for a struggle or emotional discomfort, just like physical SM seeks to create physical discomfort. So I agree that there is something that distinguishes the two scenarios but I don't think that entity is whether it is forced.

Cheers,

Sea


I guess the part of forced Bi I really have a problem with is understanding the psychology.

From what I can discern from many of these type of Profiles is that they want to preform a homosexual(or bisexual) act while being able to rationalize it to themselves if not others as "I was forced to do it". As if they are having problems coming to terms with some slight Homophobia.

Not that I am one to call others Homosexual, I mean I occasionally wear panties(Not of my own volition) and take it up the ass.(and LOVE it)

I find it hard to consider it "forced" if it is what they want to do. Forced would be doing something you don't want to do.

For example; my first BDSM experiance was what I would consider "forced". I had no real knowledge of it nor did I really have any interest in it I just stupidly got talked into letting my girlfriend tie me up and then she pretty much raped me while I begged her to stop. But here is the key difference: I really meant for her to stop.
I just ended up enjoying it, so after dealing with some really confusing emotional issues, I became a consensual submissive. (yeah so I was basically corrupted by the evils of Women, and I loved it)

That in my book constitutes force. I didn't ask for it or even plan on it, is was "forced"(She would have stopped if I hadn't enjoyed it) but if I had, I wouldn't consider it "forced".

Now I do understand and practice the "Dislocated Shoulder" method in some areas of S&M. And I can understand the motives behind it but you can't really say with a straight face that you were forced to jump off a cliff when you asked someone to push you.

Basically its not rape if you enjoy it and its not force if you ask someone to make you do it.

< Message edited by Back2theFuture -- 6/15/2011 12:40:08 AM >

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Forced Bi - 6/15/2011 1:49:52 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Back2theFuture
I guess the part of forced Bi I really have a problem with is understanding the psychology.


I do not directly understand the psychology of it but have the benefit of reading a post by an articulate sub years ago. He clarified that he had no sexual interest in men whatsoever and never thought or wished for any such activity on his own time. However, he enjoyed the idea of his domme forcing it for the submission it represented. And I can understand the psychology of it by reflecting on other situations of being forced to do something unpleasant.

quote:

As if they are having problems coming to terms with some slight Homophobia.


I don't think there is one answer or explanation behind this interest. There are other subs who do identify with this explanation to shift responsibility. The point I wish to convey is that not all subs fall under the hidden desire explanation.

I do not know enough about the situation with your girlfriend but it is possible she may have gone too far and did what most in BDSM would consider objectionable. If so, using that example as the anchor to measure other situations might not be suitable.

quote:

And I can understand the motives behind it but you can't really say with a straight face that you were forced to jump off a cliff when you asked someone to push you.


Ah. You have helped me think of another example. Let's say it's winter time and a domme and sub are outside by a pool with very cold water. Let's say the sub has no interest in jumping in the pool because he does not like to be in cold water. But he observes another domme taking a cattle prod and forcing her sub to jump in the pool. He responds erotically to this act of dominance and SM. He begins to wish his domme would do the same. His domme sees how intently he has been watching the other domme and sub. The erection is also a pretty obvious give away ;-) She borrows the cattle prod and forces him into the pool.

The attachment is not to the idea to experience cold water by going into the pool; the attachment is to the idea of being forced itself. The pool of cold water simply serves as one way to experience the dominance and sadism of being forced to do an activity. Thus, it appears one wishes to go into the pool but what one really wishes for is to be dominated and, in this case, this dominance is being done through the act of forcing into an unpleasant activity.

quote:

Basically its not rape if you enjoy it and its not force if you ask someone to make you do it.


My metric for whether it is rape or not is not whether it is enjoyed, but whether it was done with or without consent.

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to Back2theFuture)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Forced Bi - 6/15/2011 3:26:26 AM   
Back2theFuture


Posts: 183
Joined: 4/19/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea

I do not directly understand the psychology of it but have the benefit of reading a post by an articulate sub years ago. He clarified that he had no sexual interest in men whatsoever and never thought or wished for any such activity on his own time. However, he enjoyed the idea of his domme forcing it for the submission it represented. And I can understand the psychology of it by reflecting on other situations of being forced to do something unpleasant.


True but how often does the Sub tell the Domme what to do or not to do to them. Personally For me that qualifies as topping from the bottom.

But anywho isn't half the fun not knowing what will come next?


quote:


I don't think there is one answer or explanation behind this interest. There are other subs who do identify with this explanation to shift responsibility. The point I wish to convey is that not all subs fall under the hidden desire explanation.


I am not saying they all are but it is a interesting theory if nothing else.


quote:


I do not know enough about the situation with your girlfriend but it is possible she may have gone too far and did what most in BDSM would consider objectionable. If so, using that example as the anchor to measure other situations might not be suitable.


Well at the time I would have said so, but she was very well educated about BDSM and knew what she was doing. It was really no different than a Domme who knows when and how to push her subs limits to the near breaking point but not to the point of breaking any hard limits. It was done to prove a point. Yes it could have gone horribly wrong.

But my point was that it was not something that I asked for but a true demonstration of force.

quote:


Ah. You have helped me think of another example. Let's say it's winter time and a domme and sub are outside by a pool with very cold water. Let's say the sub has no interest in jumping in the pool because he does not like to be in cold water. But he observes another domme taking a cattle prod and forcing her sub to jump in the pool. He responds erotically to this act of dominance and SM. He begins to wish his domme would do the same. His domme sees how intently he has been watching the other domme and sub. The erection is also a pretty obvious give away ;-) She borrows the cattle prod and forces him into the pool.

The attachment is not to the idea to experience cold water by going into the pool; the attachment is to the idea of being forced itself. The pool of cold water simply serves as one way to experience the dominance and sadism of being forced to do an activity. Thus, it appears one wishes to go into the pool but what one really wishes for is to be dominated and, in this case, this dominance is being done through the act of forcing into an unpleasant activity.


That is really not the same. For example instead of lets say jumping in a pool. Lets say that The Sub and Domme observe another Domme and Sub engaging in Puppy Play. It appeals to him and he begins wishing that his Domme would do the same to him.

We all have kinks and fetishes that we would like to explore, but that does not constitute Force. Yes the lack of control and inability to refuse or decline is a great turn on and reinforces the set potions of "Master and Servant" but the Servant does not tell the Master when to punish or teach.

And that I think is the real point here, is it really force or punishment or more accurately the Master who is in control if the Servant is the one calling the shots.

As submissive(and I am sure you as a Domme) I have had things I wanted or wanted to experience that were denied, because I was the not the one in control.
Yes I know that, especially with BDSM, control is an illusion but it is still the Dom/me who holds the whip.

quote:


My metric for whether it is rape or not is not whether it is enjoyed, but whether it was done with or without consent.

Cheers,
Sea


Again I refer to the "Dislocated Shoulder" method of some times its necessary for someone else to force you endure something for your own good.

And hey like my mother used to tell me when forcing strange foods down my throat; You won't know if you like it until you try it.

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Forced Bi - 6/15/2011 8:08:35 AM   
Rochsub2009


Posts: 2536
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Back2theFuture

From what I can discern from many of these type of Profiles is that they want to preform a homosexual(or bisexual) act while being able to rationalize it to themselves if not others as "I was forced to do it". As if they are having problems coming to terms with some slight Homophobia.

I find it hard to consider it "forced" if it is what they want to do. Forced would be doing something you don't want to do.



Exactly!  The way I see it is that if you ask for it, then it's not "forced".

We see far too many male subs come on here and beg the Dommes to "force" them to suck another man's cock.  Yet those same male subs will inevitably add a line in their post that says something like "I'm completely straight.  I've never had a gay or bi thought in my life.  I'm not the least bit attracted to other men.  I just want to be forced to go into a gay bar and suck every cock in the room.  I also want to be forced to swallow the cum from every cock that I'm forced to suck.  It would really be great if she forced me to suck at least 10 cocks in a row."  

To me, that's a clear sign that the person is either in denial, or they're completely confused about their sexuality. 

As I say on here so often, I have nothing against gay or bi-sexual people.  But I do have a problem with gay or bi-sexual people who are lying to themselves about their own feelings.  IMO, they should at least be honest enough to admit that they're bi-curious.  Once they do that, then they can begin the process of honestly exploring their feelings.

(in reply to Back2theFuture)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Forced Bi - 6/15/2011 8:19:21 AM   
Rochsub2009


Posts: 2536
Status: offline
BTW, I should add to my previous post that I do think it's possible to be forced into doing a bi-sexual act.

I'll use myself as an example.  I truly do not harbor any gay or bi-sexual desires.  In fact, sex with another man is a hard limit for me.

Yet, I can admit that the idea of being asked to do it by a woman that I am truly submitted to is something that I find to be erotic.  Not because of the male-on-male sex aspect, but rather because of the internal struggle that would go on.  There would be a battle going on in my mind.  On the one hand, I really wouldn't want to perform the act.  But on the other hand, I would really want to obey my Domme.  Don't ask me why, but for some reason, I find this internal struggle to be arousing. 

While I've never performed a homosexual act, I have been forced to go past many of my hard limits by exactly this type of internal struggle.  In fact, I have a long list of former hard limits that are no longer limits because I was pushed in this way.

< Message edited by Rochsub2009 -- 6/15/2011 8:22:02 AM >

(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Forced Bi - 6/15/2011 9:19:42 AM   
Back2theFuture


Posts: 183
Joined: 4/19/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009

While I've never performed a homosexual act,


"No, Elton John is a Homosexual act. You just blew that guy."
~ Robin Williams.


_____________________________

  /l、
゙(゚、 。 7
 l、゙ ~ヽ
 じしf_, )ノ

(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Forced Bi - 6/15/2011 10:54:15 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
oh for fuck's sake. forced bi is a term used by repressed homos who want to suck cock but don't have the fucking balls to just do it.

sweet mary's tits! get out of the fucking closet and think nike!

hannah lynn



_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to kickable)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> Forced Bi Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094