Back2theFuture
Posts: 183
Joined: 4/19/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: undergroundsea I think the point about whether consent negates the concept of force is fuzzy. First, I don't think forcing someone requires physical power--the threat of unpleasant consequences, whether physical or not, which compel action also constitute forced behavior. A secondary may force out of bounds a running back of a football team trying to come from behind in the closing minutes of a game not for physical fear of being tackled but for fear of clock continuing to run. A judge may force a party to comply not for fear of physical harm but for fear of some other unwanted consequence such as disallowing a given type of evidence. Therefore, a sub complying with an order given by a domme to do activity x may still be forced even if physical force is not immediately used. This compliance could be driven by fear of unwanted consequence. Thus, simply because a sub complies without use of physical force does not mean he is not being forced. Next, let us consider a scenario where the compliance or submission (compliance is one form of submission) is enthusiastic. If the enthusiasm to comply is for sake of symbolizing submission, versus for sake of enjoying the activity for sake of that specific activity, then I think it is still compliance and submission. Enthusiasm to be submissive does not negate submission. I define submission to be behavior that is characterized by acts that are one or more of the following: obedient, deferential, appeasing, or capitulating. The disciple of a Buddhist Guru is still submissive to the guru even if this submission is given enthusiastically. A submissive who is obedient, deferential, appeasing, or capitulating is still submissive even if submission brings him arousal. If doing something one is told to do and liking it means we must put a word pseudo before it, then consensual submission is pseudo submission--even if it consists of acts that are obedient, deferential, appeasing and capitulating--and you and I are pseudo submissives. I see your point that there is some difference between enthusiasm for a particular form of submission, and submission without the enthusiasm. At a broad level this distinction is made by consent. Thus we have consensual submission and non-consensual submission, and consensual forced Bi versus non-consensual forced Bi. If the non-consensual forced bi is part of a consensual non-consent dynamic (versus, say, prison ;-) ), then it becomes a mouthful: consensual non-consensual forced Bi ;-) Within consent, one can make further distinctions with respect to enthusiasm, neutral feeling, or distaste for an activity done under compliance by a submissive. This distinction is seeking to discern not between submission or lack of submission, but between points on a continuum that spans D/s with and D/s without emotional SM. By emotional SM I mean the desire for a struggle or emotional discomfort, just like physical SM seeks to create physical discomfort. So I agree that there is something that distinguishes the two scenarios but I don't think that entity is whether it is forced. Cheers, Sea I guess the part of forced Bi I really have a problem with is understanding the psychology. From what I can discern from many of these type of Profiles is that they want to preform a homosexual(or bisexual) act while being able to rationalize it to themselves if not others as "I was forced to do it". As if they are having problems coming to terms with some slight Homophobia. Not that I am one to call others Homosexual, I mean I occasionally wear panties(Not of my own volition) and take it up the ass.(and LOVE it) I find it hard to consider it "forced" if it is what they want to do. Forced would be doing something you don't want to do. For example; my first BDSM experiance was what I would consider "forced". I had no real knowledge of it nor did I really have any interest in it I just stupidly got talked into letting my girlfriend tie me up and then she pretty much raped me while I begged her to stop. But here is the key difference: I really meant for her to stop. I just ended up enjoying it, so after dealing with some really confusing emotional issues, I became a consensual submissive. (yeah so I was basically corrupted by the evils of Women, and I loved it) That in my book constitutes force. I didn't ask for it or even plan on it, is was "forced"(She would have stopped if I hadn't enjoyed it) but if I had, I wouldn't consider it "forced". Now I do understand and practice the "Dislocated Shoulder" method in some areas of S&M. And I can understand the motives behind it but you can't really say with a straight face that you were forced to jump off a cliff when you asked someone to push you. Basically its not rape if you enjoy it and its not force if you ask someone to make you do it.
< Message edited by Back2theFuture -- 6/15/2011 12:40:08 AM >
|