|
Sanity -> RE: Michele Bachmann Isnt Stupid, Shes Dangerous (6/17/2011 12:06:10 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity
It was a direct answer to your post...
Let's take a look then.
Your first post...
That doesnt follow, MM. It was a direct answer to the post that it followed, not the post you are trying to connect it to for reasons only you could know.
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity
All part of the leftts mob mentality
Hate hate hate
Pretty typical of you...note that it could apply to any thread, as it's topic-less.
That was in direct response to julias post, its odd that you feel you can score some cheap points by jumping around this way and quoting me out of context
quote:
After five attacks (25% of the posts were yours, all going after other posters), here's my first post, noting the irony in the quoted portion...
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity
Nah, hateful people in threads like that one dont rent any space in my head
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Going by your posts, actually you think of little else but, to the point of an obsessive game.
...specifically, claiming you don't rent space to people in your head, but clearly occupying your morning with exactly that. And naturally, you added a fresh attack:
None of my posts were meant as personal attacks, but if you are upset because I effectively argue my political ideas I will take that as a compliment
The reason I spent an hour here this morning is that I enjoy jokes such as this one, your devoting the time it took you to make this in which you blindly lash out at me... in which you refer to me as "obsessive" [:D]
There are a few other reasons that I post as well, but no - I honestly do not for one second concern myself with what individuals such as yourself or your associates write about me, for the exact reason I posted earlier, and is requoted below. The level you constantly find yourselves sinking to does your ideology far more harm than good in my opinion, and if you are taking all of the time that you do to come after me because of the observations I make then I am obviously doing a lot of things right
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity
Why would I care, to anyone of intelligence none of you are to be taken seriously.
Example -
You are supposed to be a Taoist. So tell us which of the three keys of your divinely inspired religious beliefs inspired that particular dig at me.
Compassion, moderation... or humility?
Hmmm. Lots of fresh trolling added there. But as I pointed out, this is the game you play --
"Trolling" was what I was rebutting, specifically your trolling in which you spun the trollish words
"Going by your posts, actually you think of little else but, to the point of an obsessive game. "
If you cant handle the rebuttal MM, then quit trolling. Quit attempting your low personal attacks, and come up a level or two (or three or four) in your posting.
Youre supposed to be a Taoist, either take that off of your profile or become a lot more spiritual. The way you act now is a disgrace. to the religion, and it is unbecoming.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Case in point. You live to go after things. It's your hobby. If a post is innocuous, you'll add some silly spin so you can play victim and lash "back."
It's an observation, not a dig, and one well supported day in and day out. One wonders what you're doing that's so boring you've nothing better to do.
You also misunderstand Taoism, incidentally, as it has nothing to do with the divine and is thus not a religion in the Judeo-Christian sense.
But since you asked, it's a moderate view, compassionate from the standpoint of watching someone continually twisting unnecessarily, and offered objectively rather than as a judgment, and only when the topic arose, not from arrogance.
Where you came upon this trio is another mystery. But there you have it.
And from there, the silly round of "digging" -- appropriate for the OP subject, but you made it about you, even when I turned it back to the OP...
No, my understanding of Taoism is good. There is absolutely an aspect of the divine in Taoism as it has pantheistic roots... perhaps its your understanding of Taoism that is... lacking.
And nowhere did I write that its "a religion in the Judeo-Christian sense"
Further, you are here constantly yourself, so casting that stone belies a sort of desperation on your part in furthering this present senseless guttural attack
Go meditate on that for a while
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
And from there a big circle. Of the 17 posts you've made so far on this thread, all of them are attacking other posters, while crying that you're being attacked. Yes, I'd consider that playing the victim.
Thats a lie
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
But then, that's your game.
Youre projecting
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
When I offered solid content, clearly not going after anyone, you simply ignored it. Didn't fit into your game, even though it addressed one of your swings:
Dont feel too put off if I dont respond to your every post, that I dont stalk you as so many leftists here stalk mine
I really dont put that much stock in the things you write
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:
hating Conservative public figures as intensely as the left habitually does
You know, this isn't actually true.
William F. Buckley Jr. was a great mind and a thought provoking critic.
George Will, though sometimes carried away, often makes me think, even if I disagree generally.
Ronald Reagan, whose *policies* I can't support, was undeniably a nice, generous, well-meaning (if clueless at times) man.
William Safire is among my favorite writers--articulate and well-spoken, carefully constructing his cases.
Milton Friedman was one of my first economic heroes, especially for his pioneering understanding of monetary phenomena.
Even Richard Nixon, who I *fervently* oppose on several fronts, especially the criminal ones, was no idiot, and was in many ways (forever tainted by his considerable misdeeds) a great president.
Those are just the ones that come to mind quickly.
But the modern "conservative" movement -- in quotes because it's often really not conservative but rather (1) reactionary, (2) actively in many cases pursuing the replacement of our current system with a theocracy, (3) not interested in defense, but rather military conquest, and (4) fiscally reckless, pursuing unrealistic and unsustainable economic agenda. In fact, today's conservatives would make the movement's founders shudder in horror.
Further, such all or nothing tactics as they're pursuing today only further poison an already poisonous atmosphere, seeking not solution, not improvement, not common welfare and the good of the nation--but power, for its own sake. And they had it, briefly, from 2000-2006, but blew it pursuing a permanent majority, only to find while often gullible, the American public is not going to stand for one party rule. The conservative moment to shine was tossed aside.
But in short, no, a group that elevates "leaders" like Bachmann is nothing to take seriously, except to ensure their influence is limited.
Perhaps in time conservative extremists will be quieted, and strong conservative values will once again find voice. I hope so. I think the nation would be healthier for that voice, among others.
Naturally, you won't agree. But that's the history here.
I didnt write historically, MM, I am discussing the state of mind of leftisst currently (though the left rioted under Nixon, with flareups before as well as since his time especially in the wider context of the worldwide far left ideologues).
Here in the USA specifically the far left has been acting like a crazed hateful mob (in conversation as well as in actual mobs) since the day it was announced that Bush had won Florida vs. Gore
You see it in Hate Palin thread after Hate Palin thread
Recall in your mind all the Hate Bush threads we witnessed through the 2000s (and still do see on occasion).
Recall the RNC convention in 2004, the raging leftist mobs that converged there.
Now look at the title of this one, is Bachmann really a Nazi as the thread title suggests, as a particular Union leader accused
http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/16/union-leader-calls-new-jersey-gov-adolf-christie-compares-pension-battle-to-world-war-iii-video/
You and your ilk are indeed like a possessed mob surging after one conservative political figure and then the next, and no - its not hateful or an attack on my part to make that observation, nor to point out that these threads and the behaviors of leftists in them are hateful attacks, or that leftists on the national and international scene act more and more like deranged mobs every day, especially in light of the fact that thats exactly what how they are behaving.
|
|
|
|
