LillyBoPeep -> RE: A Guide to Fakes: (6/17/2011 9:05:11 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sexyred1 quote:
ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep quote:
ORIGINAL: sexyred1 No, I did not misunderstand your post. You have actually just made it worse by implying that an interest in intellectual discourse and astrology cannot co-exist. Who are you to deem an interest "silly"? It is people like you that demonstrate how narrow a view most people have about intellect. I can tell you that to me, intellectual compatibility means I can communicate on many topics, serious or not, with many people in a clearly articulated manner. I find well rounded people with eclectic interests to be intriguing. If you think that being into intellectual discourse and being able to discuss philosophy one moment and then celebrity gossip the next means you are a fake, you have some serious issues. What you call fake, I call desirable. i want to roll around in sexyred's brain someone with that "either, or, neither, nor" approach would be too one-dimensional for me. i love talking about high-falutin' brainy topics, but if i also can't just have a run-of-the-mill conversation with someone, then what's the point? i guess i can possibly see how the OP was shooting for humor, but it just isn't. You can roll around with me anytime. :) Seriously, if he was aiming for humor it would be different, but clearly the subsequent posts declaring that astrology was a pseudo science, etc. just continues to show the narrow view of intellect. I have often found that people who make claims like this are trying to hard to be seen as smart. For the record, I am an Aquarius with a major Scorpio rising sign. Which goes with my IQ. I am stylish like that. exactly! pseudoscience or not, some people just find it fun. it has nothing to do with their ability to carry on an intelligent conversation. if you are intelligent at the expense of being fun, then i probably won't like your brand of intelligence anyway. besides, there are all sorts of types of intelligence; the "intelligence" of a western-educated person who adores and absolutely relies on science is different than the intelligence of an Australian aboriginal person whose belief system teaches very differently, but they are both valuable ways of thinking for the people who subscribe to them. i don't like elitism, or perceived elitism. if you are who you say you are, you'll shine through.
|
|
|
|