Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: moderation interpretation?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation? Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:02:47 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Exactly.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 361
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:05:48 PM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Whatcha gonna do? 

Individuals take responsibility for doing (a), and the mods dial up (c) if (a) and (b) are both happening.  Right now things are much looser than they could be, on both sides.


_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 362
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:06:50 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
[awaiting approval]



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 363
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:07:42 PM   
GhitaAmati


Posts: 3263
Joined: 5/30/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1
Right now things are much looser than they could be, on both sides.



I think theres a thread about them loosers going on right now.....


_____________________________

I said I was a submissive, I never said I was a GOOD submissive.


Sex without love is a meaningless experience, but as far as meaningless experiences go its pretty damn good.
~Woody Allen

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 364
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:08:43 PM   
DavidLee44UK


Posts: 436
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline
agree as well but there's a fine line as well

its like on one hand you say come round my house be great

then buy a great big Alsation and put up sign beware of dog

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 365
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:11:44 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

[awaiting approval]


You almost fooled me :)

You swine!

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 366
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:12:24 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
They are situational, LaT.  However, I think most of the time, you can tell the difference between playful banter and when a person is being slammed for their orientation.  It's not the words necessarily, because we all know that some people play like that, and both parties are fine with it.  The difference is in the intent.  I'm not particularly that zoned in on various private jokes that go around this place, but when it's some version of people nailing another person because they aren't a zero on the Kinsey scale, that's crap.  It's not a 'private joke' when folks are losing an argument and it only comes out then.

If I never read that somebody is only interested in women because they've never had a "real man" ever again, it won't be a great loss to Me.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 367
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:15:27 PM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

[awaiting approval]





_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 368
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:15:53 PM   
DavidLee44UK


Posts: 436
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline
kinsey scale ??

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 369
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:16:46 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

[awaiting approval]


You almost fooled me :)

You swine!

LaT got Me doing that once.  She had to let Me in on the joke.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 370
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:17:11 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

[awaiting approval]


You almost fooled me :)

You swine!


TOS section 3, chapter 5, paragraph 11:

You may not include porcine sobriquets when launching personal attacks against Norwegians. 

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 6/20/2011 1:18:43 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 371
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:17:35 PM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
If I never read that somebody is only interested in women because they've never had a "real man" ever again, it won't be a great loss to Me.

Yeah.  Or even, "You are posting that way because you're not getting laid," which I have seen for years, and just recently people said it to me for the first time, so I am bemused by it.  I've never understood that one either.  Suppose it's true.  Does sexual frequency have anything to do with someone's character or wisdom?  Mother Theresa, the know-nothing bitch.

Still, if a user does not engage and still gets personally attacked, that is a TOS violation.  The same umbrella covers both cases.


_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 372
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:19:55 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
Those who freak at the mods every time they delete or move something, need to better understand the concept of shoveling shit into the surf.
   Implied ongoing ownership is just bullshit and anyone who is in such a rush that they think they don't have to read the TOS on a website they SIGN A CONTRACT with, is essentially an idiot when they post 'what should be'. Never mind that giving up ownership and acquiescing to the actual owner of the data, the  right to modify are fundamental customs on the internet in regard to content such as we post here. Then again assholes and opinions are inexorably linked.
   I've often thought that this stems from some view on the part of the author that they have created some 'intellectual property' that if left to rest in it's 'hallowed' spot, picked out 'specially' by it's author, that someday, along will come another who will read their marvelous creation and spark a revolution or generate the next occurrence of the big bang. Sadly, this is more likely a sign that they should simply decrease the dosage.

_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 373
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:22:04 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Does sexual frequency have anything to do with someone's character or wisdom? Mother Theresa, the know-nothing bitch.


Man ... talk about apples and oranges

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 374
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:23:22 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

What happens in Politics and Religioun............that's their problem. As long as they are lobbing grenades at one another, they are leaving the rest alone.


I think that there are lines even in PR, such as belittling someone sexually because you do not like their political opinions. That is one of the few things that can make PR too vile for even me, luckily moderators have agreed with me on that one..

Yes, there are even limits there.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 375
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:28:13 PM   
DavidLee44UK


Posts: 436
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline
but again Julia how longs that being going on

how long people violated tos

and has what happened worked ??

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 376
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:29:21 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
To say that your MacGuffies are leviathon and weigh a good stone apiece is only political reality, not a swipe.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 377
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:29:23 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

[awaiting approval]


You almost fooled me :)

You swine!

LaT got Me doing that once.  She had to let Me in on the joke.


What made it slightly easier was there's someone whose posts really are "AA" on the same page, so I could compare and contrast the differences :)

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 378
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:31:21 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

To say that your MacGuffies are leviathon and weigh a good stone apiece is only political reality, not a swipe.



Hey, I am not talking compliments, I am talking swipes...



_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 379
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/20/2011 1:32:38 PM   
GhitaAmati


Posts: 3263
Joined: 5/30/2007
Status: offline
yea...some of us actually like getting called names. How are the Mods supposed to tell the difference?

_____________________________

I said I was a submissive, I never said I was a GOOD submissive.


Sex without love is a meaningless experience, but as far as meaningless experiences go its pretty damn good.
~Woody Allen

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 380
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation? Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078