LillyBoPeep
Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: aromanholiday I don't think this is something you can do entirely on your own, even if you are deeply inspired to.< snip > The stronger the person you associate with, the stronger will be your motivation to change, I believe--for a number of obvious reasons. :) In my OP, i said it was theoretical, like just trying to generate some conversation; i'm not in a relationship and i'm not wasting time trying to internalize a role i don't currently have at the moment. and even then, my "role" that i did have and any future role i may have would probably be different enough to warrant adjustments anyway. =p i mean, i have an idea of who i am, but i'm not going to construct a complicated definition for myself because, without the other half of the equation, what's the point? it's like NuevaVida's post earlier, where she retold how she pissed off a lot of female s-types by saying "submissive enough for whom?" =p these were women with a complicated definition of ultimate pious slavehood that they held above themselves and couldn't attain. i don't have any intention of doing that. the functional definition of what i am as an s-type depends on the other person and the relationship dynamic. quote:
ORIGINAL: aromanholiday What is an example of intermalizing, by the way? You use the word in a way that is different from what I am used to. I normally use it or see it used as the process of taking another person inside of you, absorbing them. I internalized my last master: when he died, I knew, if I consulted myself, exactly what he'd want me to do in amost any circumstance. i've always associated "internalizing" with taking something as part of your definition of who you are. not necessarily another person, but just something. for example, those who study American Tribal Style bellydance internalize the movements and cues to the point of creation "muscle memory;" when you see a cue, your body is so conditioned that it "knows" instantly what move to do in response. that's essentially what i'm talking about -- in my last relationship, i had a bunch of insecurities that kept me from really internalizing what M and i were going for. given more time, i'm sure i'd have overcome them, because he was a fantastic motivator. so when i say "internalize the role," i mean that i'm simply no longer concerned with the insecurities, at least not to the point where they cause me to hold back or keep little bits of myself behind a fence.
_____________________________
Midwestern Girl "Obey your Master." Metallica
|