Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/17/2006 5:20:00 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pavel

Rotor?  I wasn't aware turbines had rotors. 


I suspect the term you are looking for is fan... to be precise "fan blade"

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to Pavel)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/17/2006 5:39:41 PM   
NakisisaX


Posts: 57
Joined: 6/11/2005
Status: offline
What's funny is that people make fun of conspiracy theories yet, people are convicted of  conspiracies and do serious time. It's not like its hard to beleive that this government had any involvement. I figure, if they knew or had clues and didn't act on it, they were involved. Imagine me knowing of a crime being committed and looking the other way just so I could say, "I didn't see anything", but I still knew what was happening...almost like pearl harbor.

_____________________________

"In times of peace, show no aggression. In times of war, show no mercy."

(in reply to Calandra)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/17/2006 6:49:01 PM   
Pavel


Posts: 308
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: Washington
Status: offline
A conspriacy in the legal sense is an agreement between two people to do somthing very wrong and naughty.  Two people working togther to kill someone is quite different from believeing that hundreds, if not thousands of people, from all walks of life, in and outside of government, worked in perfect harmony, to pull the wool over the eyes of the world, and convince them of somthing that didn't really happen.

If you read into any documents, and reports generated as a result of the september 11th attacks, the overrideing concept is more that we saw parts of the attack, but due to assorted hurdles were unable to put togther this information to turn it into a greater whole.  Key factors in this equation were the traditional CIA-FBI relationship (total and utter distrust, and un-cooperative nature), the "wall" (or the restrictions placed on who does survalince where.  Basically you had people on the domestic front of things finding information that would likely cause information found by people working the foreign sources to gain some semblance of meaning.  But since those two groups of people weren't communicating, partly thanks to President Carter's intelligence reforms, and the like, it prevented anything reselmbling a complete picture from coming about).

And don't even get me started on Pearl Harbor ("hey, let's get involved in the war by loseing almost our entire Pacific Fleet, and tens of thousands of Americans across the Pacific!"  Seriously.)

(in reply to NakisisaX)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/17/2006 7:11:23 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pavel

And don't even get me started on Pearl Harbor ("hey, let's get involved in the war by loseing almost our entire Pacific Fleet, and tens of thousands of Americans across the Pacific!"  Seriously.)



Yup, particularly since the outrage would have been just as strong had the Japanese planes run into an active CAP and every AA gun in the fleet was manned.  It was the lack of "fair play" not the casualty count that would have rammed the "a state of war exists" resolution through Congress. 

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to Pavel)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/18/2006 2:51:50 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NakisisaX

What's funny is that people make fun of conspiracy theories yet, people are convicted of  conspiracies and do serious time. It's not like its hard to beleive that this government had any involvement. I figure, if they knew or had clues and didn't act on it, they were involved. Imagine me knowing of a crime being committed and looking the other way just so I could say, "I didn't see anything", but I still knew what was happening...almost like pearl harbor.


You're on the money cuz. I absolutely don't believe Baron Rothschild, the PET or the Elders of Zion were in on this. LMAO!   But I most certainly believe they {elements of our government} knew about it, knew it was coming and did nothing to thwart it.

Now... what's far more intriguing {and troubling} to me about the whole 9-11 scenario, is this :  Why does such an overwhelming majority of the populace {Not just on collarme} distrust this government when it comes to Yellow Cake/Niger, WMD's, Haiti, The Patriot act, The Budget, NSA wire taps, Haliburton and no bid contracts, lack of border protection , illegal alien crisis etc, etc, yet most seem to trust them when it comes to their accounting / version of events regards 9-11?

In other words.... why is it plausible to believe that they lie about a great many other things, but yet when it's brought up that they may be lying about 9-11, we leave the arena of respectability and move to one which is filled with paranoia and conspiracy? For someone who deals in logic, that is perhaps the thing that doesn't make sense the most.

But like I said before..... I think the denial on the part of folks who see and believe this governments version of the  truth regards 9-11 has nothing to do with their lack of logic, and everything to do with a generational psyche {Kinda like a dog that's been bred throughout its existence to like the water} that's part of them{imbedded in them}which says the '' Trust your government'' ''We're the good guys'' '' And they're the bad guys''

It's a psyche that tells them they're not capable of such sinisterness and utter greed, therefore they cannot and will not self-project such evil on to anyone else. The methodology to reach a point of such traitorous and diabolic nature just isn't comprehendible for most. Just stop and think for a moment. Where in their minds would it leave them if they had to walk around in their daily lives each day knowing their government was complicit - Very scary.



 - R

< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 5/18/2006 3:09:13 AM >


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to NakisisaX)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/18/2006 1:15:42 PM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Now... what's far more intriguing {and troubling} to me about the whole 9-11 scenario, is this :  Why does such an overwhelming majority of the populace {Not just on collarme} distrust this government when it comes to Yellow Cake/Niger, WMD's, Haiti, The Patriot act, The Budget, NSA wire taps, Haliburton and no bid contracts, lack of border protection , illegal alien crisis etc, etc, yet most seem to trust them when it comes to their accounting / version of events regards 9-11?

In other words.... why is it plausible to believe that they lie about a great many other things, but yet when it's brought up that they may be lying about 9-11, we leave the arena of respectability and move to one which is filled with paranoia and conspiracy? For someone who deals in logic, that is perhaps the thing that doesn't make sense the most.


You make an excellent point and it is one that somehow never occurred to me.

I am one that does not buy the conspiracies regarding 9-11-2001. I guess my biggest reason for not buying it is that it would involve too large of a group of people to ensure complete silence. The other reasons are that independent analysis of the events of 9-11 are basically consistent with other independent analysis. There are some questions that have to be asked but somehow I do not see where the government could keep those not under their control from blowing the whistle if there was sufficient proof that the government was involved. It would have hit like a shit storm much like Watergate did.

The one other thing that makes me tend toward not buying the conspiracies is the fact that the ones that claim the government was involved have not been able to impeach the evidence on record. Impeach, not point to a small item and scream SEE??? Discrediting what is on record would be the only way, I think, that I could buy into that.

I guess it is one of those things that we will never know for sure one way or the other.

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/18/2006 2:15:38 PM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger

quote:

ORIGINAL: NakisisaX

What's funny is that people make fun of conspiracy theories yet, people are convicted of  conspiracies and do serious time. It's not like its hard to beleive that this government had any involvement. I figure, if they knew or had clues and didn't act on it, they were involved. Imagine me knowing of a crime being committed and looking the other way just so I could say, "I didn't see anything", but I still knew what was happening...almost like pearl harbor.


You're on the money cuz. I absolutely don't believe Baron Rothschild, the PET or the Elders of Zion were in on this. LMAO!   But I most certainly believe they {elements of our government} knew about it, knew it was coming and did nothing to thwart it.

Now... what's far more intriguing {and troubling} to me about the whole 9-11 scenario, is this :  Why does such an overwhelming majority of the populace {Not just on collarme} distrust this government when it comes to Yellow Cake/Niger, WMD's, Haiti, The Patriot act, The Budget, NSA wire taps, Haliburton and no bid contracts, lack of border protection , illegal alien crisis etc, etc, yet most seem to trust them when it comes to their accounting / version of events regards 9-11?

In other words.... why is it plausible to believe that they lie about a great many other things, but yet when it's brought up that they may be lying about 9-11, we leave the arena of respectability and move to one which is filled with paranoia and conspiracy? For someone who deals in logic, that is perhaps the thing that doesn't make sense the most.

But like I said before..... I think the denial on the part of folks who see and believe this governments version of the  truth regards 9-11 has nothing to do with their lack of logic, and everything to do with a generational psyche {Kinda like a dog that's been bred throughout its existence to like the water} that's part of them{imbedded in them}which says the '' Trust your government'' ''We're the good guys'' '' And they're the bad guys''

It's a psyche that tells them they're not capable of such sinisterness and utter greed, therefore they cannot and will not self-project such evil on to anyone else. The methodology to reach a point of such traitorous and diabolic nature just isn't comprehendible for most. Just stop and think for a moment. Where in their minds would it leave them if they had to walk around in their daily lives each day knowing their government was complicit - Very scary.



 - R


At the risk of reigniting our last flame war:

The reason I don't believe 9/11 conspiracy theories is not because of my generational psyche or my refusal to project my own capacity for evil onto the government.  The reason I don't believe them is that there is no evidence to support them.  Every single allegation put forth by 9/11 conspiracy theorists is provably false.

The other problem is that the "official version" of events is not a version that was manufactured by George Bush, or his administration.  The so-called "official version" is one that is corroborated by members of his political opposition, the physical evidence, thousands of eyewitensses, and, sadly, grieving families.

If you want to argue that FBI field agents suspected Moussaoui & Co. were up to something, and this never got communicated to the right people because of bureaucratic inertia or group-think from fighting the last war...ok.  I can go there.  But there is not a single shred of evidence that the US government planned and carried out these attacks.  Absolutely none.

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/18/2006 6:32:33 PM   
NakisisaX


Posts: 57
Joined: 6/11/2005
Status: offline
Conspiracies can be proven more on our level because we don't have the knowledge of dodging red tape and lack the ability to make up things like "the patriot act". So yes, they will be hard to prove, just as hard as the government tries to prove Bin Laden did all this. I was in the marines and I was with a unit called F.A.S.T company (Fleet Anti-terrorist Security Team) and that's all we trained for and during Desert Storm, we learned that no one denies the damage they caused because they want to get their message out. Bin Laden's initial "alleged" video tape was played and government translators said he denied it then later changed it to him admitting it.... uh-huh.
My doctor, who is Lebanese knows all about that also and we both asked where are the other attacks? No organisation woth its salt will attack once and flee. The government's whole story on what happened sounds like something in Aesop's fables. And yet the patriot act arrived so quickly and only now are they starting to find flaws in it. Either they think we're a nation of idiots or they really don't care because no one will stop them.

_____________________________

"In times of peace, show no aggression. In times of war, show no mercy."

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/18/2006 10:03:13 PM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

The other reasons are that independent analysis of the events of 9-11 are basically consistent with other independent analysis. There are some questions that have to be asked but somehow I do not see where the government could keep those not under their control from blowing the whistle if there was sufficient proof that the government was involved. It would have hit like a shit storm much like Watergate did.

The one other thing that makes me tend toward not buying the conspiracies is the fact that the ones that claim the government was involved have not been able to impeach the evidence on record. Impeach, not point to a small item and scream SEE??? Discrediting what is on record would be the only way, I think, that I could buy into that.


I completely understand the reluctance on your part. You voice an element of distrust, yet you need a smoking gun. Again... I understand, fully. The sad thing is, it takes tremendous resources to come up with a smoking gun, but more headway is being made every day.  

Look at it this way.... Barry Scheck, the famous attorney in the OJ Simpson case, and co-founder of the ''Innocence project'' knew for the longest time that there were many, many ''convicted murders'' and folks sitting death row, who were ultimately convicted on false evidence and erroneous testimony from eye witnesses. Yet prosecutor’s thorough out the lands, balked, and called it a conspiracy theory. It wasn't until DNA evidence came on line as a means with greater efficiency to prove/ disprove Schecks theory/allegations. Since then, many prosecutors have been made to eat their words and hundreds of defamed, innocent people have been exonorated.

As Pollux has mentioned numerous times {and its true} more folks are coming to the realization every day that there's more to 9-11 than meets the eye. Many are no longer satisfied with what they are hearing from Fox news/CNN and the administration's sycophants. Could there be a reason why this is true?

Have you ever heard of the Northwoods Documents or Operation Gladio? I point to this as conclusive evidence that the government is very capable of keeping a secret for quite a long time. I ask you politely to read each document and then come back tell me if you still feel the government is incapable of such a conspiracy.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/northwoods.html



 - R

_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/19/2006 6:57:47 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
Iran eyes badges for Jews -- Law would require non-Muslim insignia

quote:

Human rights groups are raising alarms over a new law passed by the Iranian parliament that would require the country's Jews and Christians to wear coloured badges to identify them and other religious minorities as non-Muslims. "This is reminiscent of the Holocaust," said Rabbi Marvin Hier, the dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles. "Iran is moving closer and closer to the ideology of the Nazis." Iranian expatriates living in Canada yesterday confirmed reports that the Iranian parliament, called the Islamic Majlis, passed a law this week setting a dress code for all Iranians, requiring them to wear almost identical "standard Islamic garments." The law, which must still be approved by Iran's "Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenehi before being put into effect, also establishes special insignia to be worn by non-Muslims. Iran's roughly 25,000 Jews would have to sew a yellow strip of cloth on the front of their clothes, while Christians would wear red badges and Zoroastrians would be forced to wear blue cloth.

I suppose we expect this kind of thing from hardcore Islamists, but hijacking a few planes and flying them into buildings?  Why, that's just inconceivable.

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/19/2006 5:27:44 PM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
It looks like this story is (thankfully) untrue:

quote:

Several experts are casting doubt on reports that Iran had passed a law requiring the country’s Jews and other religious minorities to wear coloured badges identifying them as non-Muslims. The Iranian embassy in Otttawa also denied the Iranian government had passed such a law.

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=6626a0fa-99de-4f1e-aebe-bb91af82abb3

I was wrong to link to that so story without giving it time to pan out.  I still don't buy any of the 9/11 conspiracy theories, but if I inflamed feelings on this needlessly by linking to that story, I apologize.

Edit: typo






< Message edited by pollux -- 5/19/2006 5:28:06 PM >

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/19/2006 10:58:31 PM   
subtlesubie


Posts: 138
Joined: 1/5/2006
Status: offline
Oh for fuck's sake... not this again!

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/20/2006 2:50:49 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

 At the risk of reigniting our last flame war: 
  Ok….Are we down for three rounds or ten? No headbutts, thumbs or shots below the waist, alright? You can pick who you want to work your corner; I’ll take Lam or Chaingang, along with a few Q-tips and a fresh jar of bag balm. 

 
quote:

Every single allegation put forth by 9/11 conspiracy theorists is provably false.
 

Well….. of course I disagree.  

What about the insider trading scenario that involved a record level of activity {six times the normal activity} with regard to the ‘’put options’’ traded for American and United Airlines days before 9-11?  

My father practiced securities law for nearly twenty years. His analysis in regards to the FBI’s claim that this is nothing more than weird anomaly is that it’s highly improbable if not impossible.  

Even Mindy Kleinberg, one of the leaders/spokespersons  from the 9-11 Family Steering Committee said the FBI’s investigation was both suppressed and amateur. To quote her she says :  

"Never before in the history of  the
Chicago Exchange were such large amounts of United and American Airlines options traded. These investors netted a profit of at least $5 million after the September 11th attacks. Interestingly, the names of the investors remain undisclosed and the $5 million remains unclaimed in the Chicago Exchange account."  

 Is your way of debunking/deconstructing this aspect of the so-called conspiracy theory just saying that it was investigated by the FBI  and they came to such and such conclusion? I say fuck the FBI!  How come whistle-blowers are the only ones to ever lose their jobs in that organization?  

What about all the warnings not to travel that were received by dignitaries such as Willy Brown and top echelon people in the Pentagon?   I listened to a radio interview with Willy Brown on KGO radio {ABC affiliate} about six months ago where he was questioned about the prior warning – And he said he still didn't no what to make of it.  

And then we go back to the Pentagon. If you look at the picture right after it was hit by something, you can clearly see that it wasn't a commercial jetliner. Look at the lawn right in front of the supposed place the jet hit. It’s untouched!! That’s impossible!!  

Also… I have provided a link where there is an audio transcript of a CNN reporter who is there minutes after the explosion. He says there’s absolutely no evidence of plane hitting the building or any large wreckage {tail section or engine block} strewn about. Then five years later he retracts his story and tells a different one! Both accounts are on tape.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9MHojRsTRA

quote:

I suppose we expect this kind of thing from hardcore Islamists, but hijacking a few planes and flying them into buildings?  Why, that's just inconceivable.


That's fine... you made a mistake - No problem. But I want you to know that I have never questioned the Muslim extremist's motives, only their capabilities. Hell... I hear people say all the time that they're the best bomb makers in the world - Bullshit! If it wasn't for the IRA, they'd still be throwing rocks at the Jews.

Ward Churchill said If you don't believe the official version of the Bush/ Keane-Hamilton commission 9-11 report, you're a racist. You're racist, because what you're really arguing is that Arabs are inferior beings, who are not talented enough to do such a complicated thing.

I'm arguing the exact opposite of Ward Churchill, brother. I'm telling you that there's no way the dudes in the dirty pajamas and beards could pull this off without help from insiders. No way.  They may be able to put together a car bomb or run a 7-11, but there's no way they could take the towers down like that. 



 - R

< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 5/20/2006 3:10:36 AM >


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/20/2006 5:58:13 AM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger
I'm arguing the exact opposite of Ward Churchill, brother. I'm telling you that there's no way the dudes in the dirty pajamas and beards could pull this off without help from insiders. No way.  They may be able to put together a car bomb or run a 7-11, but there's no way they could take the towers down like that. 


I remember reading an "analysis" in the old Chicago Tribune that was written in early 1941 that concluded the Japanese were no threat because they all were nearsighted and therefore couldn't fly aircraft effectively.

The thing about a "race" or any other large grouping of individuals is that it contains a broad range of capabilities and judging any individual on the basis of a real or supposed average is highly deceptive.  Back in the 1940's, most women weren't all that interested in science or math.  That didn't stop Grace Hopper from doing work at a level most men couldn't even comprehend.

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/20/2006 6:25:57 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger
What about all the warnings not to travel that were received by dignitaries such as Willy Brown and top echelon people in the Pentagon? 

The purpose of these warnings was to create a mood that prepared those warned for the possibility of such an attack. The purpose of these warnings, therefore was to in advance lend credibility to the coming attacks and to make it believable in hindsight. "We knew it all along! Why did we ignore it? What stupidity". This was thus an exercise in sophisticated - but with hindsight obvious - mind control.
 
As there were no people aboard those planes, the warning was empty and never intended as such.

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/20/2006 6:28:25 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
Hey Ranger...no problem, we won't need our fight docs this time.

About 6 weeks ago, I got into it with one of the "Loose Change" crew on another board.  Since that time, I've spent WAY WAY too much time looking into the various 9/11 conspiracy websites as well as the websites and web forums that have sprung up to debunk them.  I'm embarassed to say how much I've looked into this subject and how much time I've spent on it.

I'm not going to trade charge & countercharge with you.  I'll just say this...  Every single 9/11 conspiracy "oddity" (including those you mention) that has been raised is either --

1.  Factually wrong (contradicted by physical evidence or eyewitnesses)
2.  A distortion of something someone said or a quote taken out of context
3.  Something which has a simpler and more credible alternative explanation
4.  Something that appears to have a sinister link but in fact has no connection

This includes all of those you mention in your post.  The put options, the no plane hit the Pentagon, controlled demolition, all of it. And no, I am not basing this on blind faith in the FBI.  There is plenty of evidence without needing to just say, "well the FBI looked into it and said it was all ok".

For example -- the put options.  Fine, there were put options placed on 9/11.  But you have to look at the trading record for the entire year.  Was 9/11 any different (no) -- or was it an average day (yes)?  Are the spikes in trading out of family (they weren't)?  What other trades were the people who placed the put options doing? (in one case, the client who had the put options on AA had SELL orders placed for United!)  If you run down all the facts on these things (and most of it is out there if you look), you will find that NONE of it holds up.  None of it. 

Controlled demolition?  Not supported by a single professional civil or structural engineer in this country.  Not one.  Not supported by physics.  Not supported by evidence.

Hani Hanjour not good enough pilot to hit the Pentagon?  Go to airliners.net or flightsim.com, educate yourself, and get a copy of Microsoft Flight Simulator.  Load up the 757 expansion pack and the DC scenery pack and see if you can dead reckon from Dulles to Reagan National.  See if you can spot the Pentagon from 7000 feet and crash into it.  Talk to some 757 or 767 pilots and ask them if it's possible these guys could maneuver the aircraft once it's in flight. 

I have a little bit of aviation in my background, and I can tell you -- flying a plane is not hard.  Once it's airborne, and if you don't have to land, it is child's play.  You need to know how to turn (turn the wheel), climb (add power and pull back), descend (decrease power and push forward), move the throttles, turn off the transponder and autopilot, and look out the windows.  That's it.

Look into the composition of the hijacking teams.  There were two types of guys -- brainy guys, and "muscle" guys.  The brainy guys who flew the planes weren't cave-dwellers.  They were educated and relatively well-off economically.  The muscle was brought in later.  They didn't need to be the sharpest knives in the drawer.  All they needed to know how do was scare the hell out of people and have no qualms about slitting some throats.

Bothered by the fact that there's nothing left at the crash sites except metallic confetti and scraps of tissue?  Don't be.  That's what happens (sadly) when planes crash.  Planes are basically thin aluminum tubes filled mostly with air.  They fare poorly against the ground and buildings.  Especially when they're flown full power into the ground in a near vertical dive (UAL 93) or rammed full speed into a kevlar, steel & concrete reinforced structure (AA77).  Look into it.  Look into the modeling and analysis on this done at Purdue and MIT.  Gin up some morbid curiosity and search the internet for photos of aircraft crash scenes.  They're out there pal -- believe it.

Troubled that you haven't seen pictures of physical remains at the Pentagon?  Search for the government exhibits that were shown at the Moussouai trial.  But be prepared -- it's ghastly.

There are some puzzling discrepancies... I don't know why the government held onto that Pentagon video so long, for example.  I don't get it...  But that is not evidence of a government cover-up.  It is evidence of government STUPIDITY (something I have no problem believing), but not a cover-up.  Come on man.  The Feds can't tap a damn phone and keep it secret.

Like I said before -- you want me to believe the government dropped the ball pre-9/11?  Ok (I stop short of "let it happen on purpose" though).  You want me to believe Bush capitalized on the fear & insecurity in the months following?  Ok.  You want to argue that some neocons were itching for a fight with Saddam Hussein since 1991?  Ok.  You think some mid-level people in the FBI and maybe some top-level people at the CIA should've been fired?  Ok.  Were the 9/11 Commission and Congressional inquiry into 9/11 crippled by defensive politics?  Ok.  All of those things are serious arguments.

But I don't believe that the US government planned and carried out these attacks, nor that it purposefully allowed the attacks to go forward.  There just isn't any evidence for either case.  None.

That's all I'm going to say on the subject.  I've made myself look like an ass around here twice too many times on this subject already.  If you want to continue, please write me on the other side.  I'd be happy to engage in a link-duel off-line.

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/20/2006 1:29:05 PM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren

quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger
I'm arguing the exact opposite of Ward Churchill, brother. I'm telling you that there's no way the dudes in the dirty pajamas and beards could pull this off without help from insiders. No way.  They may be able to put together a car bomb or run a 7-11, but there's no way they could take the towers down like that. 


I remember reading an "analysis" in the old Chicago Tribune that was written in early 1941 that concluded the Japanese were no threat because they all were nearsighted and therefore couldn't fly aircraft effectively.

The thing about a "race" or any other large grouping of individuals is that it contains a broad range of capabilities and judging any individual on the basis of a real or supposed average is highly deceptive.  Back in the 1940's, most women weren't all that interested in science or math.  That didn't stop Grace Hopper from doing work at a level most men couldn't even comprehend.


John....

I'm sympathetic to what you're saying, but comparing what folks thought almost seventy years ago about the country of Japan as a fighting force on the whole vs. what I'm saying about a vastly, exaggerated, blown-up, handful of Muslim fundamentalists, is quite a different ball game. I dunno though..... maybe you're right and my vivid memories of Baghdad Bob have wrongly influenced me and thrown my judgment way off kilter.



 - R



< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 5/20/2006 1:42:47 PM >


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/20/2006 1:41:06 PM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

That's all I'm going to say on the subject.  I've made myself look like an ass around here twice too many times on this subject already.  If you want to continue, please write me on the other side.  I'd be happy to engage in a link-duel off-line.


Nah.... I think we're both alright. Of course once we come to topics such as '' Rude e-mails'' or ''No limit Slaves'', we might have to handicap ourselves a bit, as we may be slightly outclassed.



 - R



_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/20/2006 7:45:44 PM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger

quote:

That's all I'm going to say on the subject.  I've made myself look like an ass around here twice too many times on this subject already.  If you want to continue, please write me on the other side.  I'd be happy to engage in a link-duel off-line.


Nah.... I think we're both alright. Of course once we come to topics such as '' Rude e-mails'' or ''No limit Slaves'', we might have to handicap ourselves a bit, as we may be slightly outclassed.



 - R




Man you're not kidding.  Those were the days, huh? 

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? - 5/20/2006 11:13:49 PM   
xxmstrchasxx


Posts: 423
Joined: 5/9/2006
Status: offline
The Government is only going to tell you what they want you to know.  We have seen this in WWII, Korean War and Vietnam and now Iraq.

When I came home from Nam and saw old tapes of what was being showed here I thought they were talking about some other place.  The government. had us winning the war, showing how few casualties we had and how many they had which was never the case.  We weren't allowed to win the war.

In Iraq, they showed our men being killed, the news station went to a commercial and that reporter was never heard or seen again.

Here's a question for you, what if we had already captured Bin Laden and let him loose?  Why would we do that?  Because the Moslems have so many millions of members in their religion and they hold Bin Laden with such high esteem, like a God like being, that if we captured him or killed him they would be more terrorist here than we could handle all willing to die because of them believing this is a religious war.  What if the source of this was a soldier in the company that let Bin Laden go?  If that were true wouldn't this make the Iraq War and all the lives lost for nothing since this was supposed to because of terrorism?

That is why Bush was told to withdraw his statement about this being a crusade.  Which he did.

I'm not saying there was a cover up, I'm not saying any of the above is true to avoid a arguement, what I am saying is the American public will only know what the government wants us to know and see.

_____________________________

XxMasterChasxX

(in reply to Calandra)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: USA's involvement in 9/11 and aftermath...? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078