RE: Disappointment with Obama (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Hippiekinkster -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/2/2011 10:50:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

poor poor lil liberals... all sad by o'dumbo now. Hey, it's YOUR hope and change baby. Quit voting for prom kings and start voting for a freaking president in the future, ok?


Your picture makes you look like your dentures aren't in.
The best thing of all about a country like ours?
It's that I don't have to take the ravings and "orders" from some cranky old fuck they left out in the desert-grade UV for too long.


That's a pic of the actor who played General Hammond on "Stargate SG-1". I imagine Don Davis would be mighty pissed if he found out some redneck Teabilly stole his image for use on a perv board... were he still alive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_S._Davis

Az is a sickpuppet. A liar, fraud, and thief. What kind of scum steals a dead man's image?




imperatrixx -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/2/2011 11:28:35 PM)

Wow. It would be one thing if it was a photo of him in character, I'd use an actress as my image if I liked them in a role they played, but that looks like a snapshot...like he's trying to make people think it's actually him.

That's messed up.




tazzygirl -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/2/2011 11:32:56 PM)

quote:

Of course I'm going to try to one-up someone that debates me/calls me out. It's the nature of a natural dominant. Why do you think you're continuing to address this subject too?


As opposed to the nature of the unnatural dominant?




NeedToUseYou -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 2:22:05 AM)

I did not support Obama nor McCain in 08, but between the two of them, I'd say Obama was the better gamble at the time, as McCain was at least upfront about his blood lust, and infatuation with a nation destroying "offense" budget.

The only thing I was hopeful that Obama would do, that could have made me possibly vote for him 2012 was to reduce our military spending substantially. He has not, he is just as bad as Bush, or any neocon in this regard IMO, and there goes your medicaid funds, they are beating those dollars into bullets.

So, Obama in his quest to look tough, easily lost some percentage of the vote, IMO, as anyone that is truly against trillion dollar "offense" spending can not vote for Obama this time. He's proven he is for a trillion dollar war machine. So, there is no difference, between a Romney, or most the of the GOP and Obama.

And we will not be bringing this economy into any form of balance without heavy military cuts, so, IMO, voting for Obama is the same as voting for 4 more years of record budget deficits, it's voting for eventual heavy cuts in programs the left generally proclaim to support. It's voting for someone that has proven he has no real intent to fix the "offense" budget.

Sure, he's made his little promise on Afghanistan, that is like taking a 5 gallon bucket of water and throwing it on a fire. It's a pathetic tiny nothing of an attempt to create an excuse supporters can cling to and say "see, obama is reducing our military presence".

Anyway, I won't vote if it's Romney Versus Obama. It would be more productive to eat sand.

Essentially, there is 0.1 percent chance Obama will get my vote at this point, it could have been 90%, but he is as war crazy as the next. No thanks.





willbeurdaddy -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 9:58:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Just a quick question;

Of those you elect, do they ever turn out to be what they told you they would be ?



GWB and Obama are exactly what they said they would be.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 10:08:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

However the thing the cons need to remember is we learned our lesson in 2000. No more protest votes and no more staying home.



Libs turnout based on emotion. They learned nothing in 2000.




Musicmystery -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 10:09:10 AM)

quote:

Libs turnout based on emotion.


So do conservatives. It's why strategists keep looking for wedge issues.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 10:11:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Libs turnout based on emotion.


So do conservatives. It's why strategists keep looking for wedge issues.


Some do, most dont.




SternSkipper -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 10:20:24 AM)

quote:

Wow. It would be one thing if it was a photo of him in character, I'd use an actress as my image if I liked them in a role they played, but that looks like a snapshot...like he's trying to make people think it's actually him.


The user of said photo does not enjoy a reputation of being 'wrapped that tight', so he probably thinks people DO identify that with Don Davis. Or considering the sock puppet theories surrounding AZBM, he probably think it fits into the overall deception.





Musicmystery -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 10:34:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Libs turnout based on emotion.


So do conservatives. It's why strategists keep looking for wedge issues.


Some do, most dont.

Uh-huh.




SternSkipper -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 12:04:26 PM)

quote:

That's a pic of the actor who played General Hammond on "Stargate SG-1". I imagine Don Davis would be mighty pissed if he found out some redneck Teabilly stole his image for use on a perv board... were he still alive.


Wow, I'd say who gives a fuck, except leaves me wondering if he's using pics of an aged Don Davis, and given people tend to use someone easily recognizable as famous or someone BETTER LOOKING than them, he must be a fucking wreck. Because i guarantee you that you and about 1/2 a dozen SG1 fans know that's Don Davis.
  But thanks for pointing that out....
AZBM the order to put your fucking dentures in still stands.





ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 4:05:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Libs turnout based on emotion.


So do conservatives. It's why strategists keep looking for wedge issues.


Some do, most dont.


Fear is an emotion, and fear is the root of conservatism.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 6:42:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Libs turnout based on emotion.


So do conservatives. It's why strategists keep looking for wedge issues.


Some do, most dont.


Fear is an emotion, and fear is the root of conservatism.



More bumper sticker bullshit.




SternSkipper -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 8:38:55 PM)

quote:


Though I will say, moderates and independents are more likely to be scared away from the current GOP candidates than enticed to vote for them. Obama's policies have been fairly moderate, whether successful or not. I think the GOP's biggest mistake so far is to focus on super conservative/religious right


I am curious ... on meet the press and one of the other sunday political wrap-ups LAST sunday (in the wake of the NY gay marriage vote), there was a fairly certain consensus that the GOP is going to try and unhorse the democrats and PARTICULARLY Obama. Now, as late as March, they were still delivering the message to the Christian right that they support DOMA, are against full recognition of gays in the military, yadda yadda yadda...
   I keep wondering WHAT THE FUCK are they going to tell the fundies. who clearly overshadow the potential gay gop voters by a huge margin?
How will they sell that and not have fundies walking away?
   Or do they think that the fundies are simply trapped in their camp with nowhere else to go?

  




DomKen -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/3/2011 8:43:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Libs turnout based on emotion.


So do conservatives. It's why strategists keep looking for wedge issues.


Some do, most dont.

Yeah the tea party people certainly didn't come out based on anything but rational thought. All the screaming about keeping the government out of medicare was a well informed statement.

And let's not forget the whole anti gay marriage stuff from 2004. How many states did cons get anti gay marriage amendmnets on the ballot? Of course that was completely rational. Gays getting married would destroy the economy

[8|]




Termyn8or -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/4/2011 2:52:56 AM)

"Gays getting married would destroy the economy "

Yup. Two guys can't have kids. Therefore they will not be so grateful for the coverage because they will not incur those expenses, and the marriage is likely to break up before they get old enough so that one's infirmity loads the healthcare provider of the other. This would result in a less awed public perception and a gradual shift in public opinion that insurance is good for us. That would be bad for them and it is bad for the economy. For THEIR economy.

See how that works ? I know it is extremely twisted and convoluted and you probably think I am stoned or something but I am not. The real problem here is that noone can mount any decent argument against my ridiculousness, can they ?

Take a crack at it.

T^T




imperatrixx -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/4/2011 3:07:51 AM)

People weren't protesting about the "sanctity of the economy" then.




Musicmystery -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/4/2011 6:56:19 AM)

quote:

People weren't protesting about the "sanctity of the economy" then.


Right. That was Bill Clinton.




Moonhead -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/4/2011 7:26:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Just a quick question;

Of those you elect, do they ever turn out to be what they told you they would be ?



GWB and Obama are exactly what they said they would be.

Only in the sense that the chimp campaigned as a "uniter" and everybody in your country was united in loathing him by the time he left office.




popeye1250 -> RE: Disappointment with Obama (7/4/2011 3:37:28 PM)

Boy, it's very early for the leftists to be panicking this far out!
That usually starts happening in the Sept right befoe the election.
And look at all the millions of people who've been unemployed for 2,3,4 years now, who do you think they'll be voting for in Nov of 2012?




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125