WinsomeDefiance
Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007 Status: offline
|
I asked this questions ages ago, when I first learned about BDSM. In my marriage, my husband was the authority. My job, as his wife, was to submit to him. At night, I set out his clothes, set up his coffee so that it was brewed and ready when he woke up. When he came home, his dinner was ready. He was served first, then the children, then myself. I may have written the checks and did all the work to prepare the bills to be paid, but he decided what was paid and when. I didn't spend money or go anywhere without 'checking with him first.' I know a great many M/s relationships where the slave doesn't afford her Master a fraction of that much attention and consideration. I had never even HEARD of BDSM. It would have been offensive to me, to be grouped in with activities such as that. Now, (here is where I shrugged - but you couldn't see it) I just consider BDSM as something that people do or participate in. Dominant and submissive traits are just that, personality traits. I don't shove D/s under the umbrella of BDSM - unless the couple involved in D/s say they practice (in other words, do/participate in) BDSM. When I say I Switch, I consider that something I do. It is a term I relate to BDSM. I don't really think I have a 'switchy' personality. I don't waffle between being dominant and submissive. However, when participating in BDSM activities, I'm either Topping, or I"m bottoming. Since I do both, I'm happy to - switch - it up. Meh. That's how I see it. Yes, if you follow the etymology of the acronym, it is widely accepted that there is a trifecta implied. Hurray for the evolution of the acronym. Whatever. If I can let people define their own relationships, I'm not going to go apeshit over how they define an acronym.
|