RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


KneelingSub25 -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 10:47:00 AM)

LadyPact, first I want to thank you for taking the time to think about what I wrote and not just launch into an ad hominem attack regarding my bias.  Like I have said repeatedly, I'm not pretending to be objective here.  I am stating my opinion, and I welcome other people's opinions.  Thank you for responding constructively.   

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I want to preface this by saying that I am replying in this particular style *not* with the intention to pick your post apart.  You've got some points where I agree, some I don't agree, and some that I'm teetering on the brink.  You did want discussion, right?

It's fine to disagree with me.  I invite discussion! 

quote:

ORIGINAL: KneelingSub25
I had intense sexual fantasies of being dominated.

We'd probably have some debate about fantasies = living.  Not the point of your thread, so I'll move forward.

Your point is well taken, but I did experiment in High School, too.  Most of the domination was online, though. 

quote:

Over the years I've met about a dozen "lifestyle" Dommes from CollarMe for real-time play, but the vast majority of my D/s experiences have been online.

This is probably part of the issue.

Agreed.  I will not deny that my real-time experience is very, very limited, which might distort my perspective.

quote:

A few things struck me.  First, I noticed that the majority of people attending were male Doms and female subs.  In a crowd of 20 or 30 people, I may have been one of only 2 male subs present.

I normally wouldn't split a paragraph, but this is contradictory to My experience.  I don't think I've *ever* been to a munch where only two sub males attended.  I think it would shock Me beyond belief.

Very interesting.  I would like to hear other people's perspective on this. 

quote:

Second, I detected a general perception of "male subs" that was quite different from the perception of "female subs."

This part, I do agree with.  The problem on this one is how male subs are perceived when first entering the lifestyle.  A good percentage of them spawn their interests from their sexual desires alone, relying more on fantasy than reality.  There's no balance in it.  Women tend to look more at the overall picture.

This is fine, but I guess my issue is this: how do you filter?  There's nothing wrong with filtering, but I personally wish it were done in a more balanced way. 

quote:

Let me preface this by saying a few things: everyone was very, very nice to me.  They were friendly, open, genuine, and had a sense of humor (acquired through years of life experience).  In truth, they were good people, and they were quite accepting of me.  So, nothing that I am about to say is a reflection on them.  It is a reflection on the lifestyle generally.  

I didn't snip this out based solely on the fact that I'm glad you said it.  Too often, folks complain about the reception that they receive at a munch.  That they found the atmosphere clique-y or they feel that people should have been falling all over themselves to greet the new person, paying no attention to anybody else.  Kudos on this.

Thank you!

quote:

One female sub said, "it's good to finally meet a male submissive with a personality."  I inquired further.  "Lots of male subs are...just kind of creepy: they don't say anything, they leer at women, and they just want to get sexual."  Would she have said the same thing about shy female subs? 

This kind of makes Me wonder just how many male subs in established dynamics this particular woman has met.  It sounds as though her experiences with male subs are based more on the stereotype, driven by first encounters with fantasists, had a great influence in forming her opinions.

Agreed.

quote:

Here's what I think:  the majority of women in the "lifestyle" (Dominant women, submissive women, switch women) seem to regard males as unnecessary/useless/superfluous until proven otherwise.  That is to say, they believe it is the duty of the male to capture the woman's attention (whether it be for D/s play or for friendship).  This relates equally to male subs and male Doms.  The truth is, in the enlightened age of feminism, women and men are not treated equally in the D/s lifestyle.

So much to cover here!  Gender aside, I don't happen to think anyone "needs" some great fulfillment that *must* be provided by an outside, unknown party.  I believe that healthy people are perfectly capable of finding self-fulfillment, happiness, and joy without dependency on another human being to create those things for them.  There is a difference between *wanting* to share your life with another person, instead of *needing* them to fill a void.

I do agree that males do find themselves needing to capture the attention of the female.  This is true in nature and is only emphasized with the imbalance of the D/s world.  A strong, confident woman is not lacking for attention.  If a male does not step up to become noticed, I can promise that someone else will be.

No.  Males and females are *not* treated equally within the D/s lifestyle.  It absolutely is a woman's market, side of the kneel not withstanding.  This is the very reason that female submissives have a greater opportunity of selection, have more options in selecting partners, etc than males do.  There have *always* been more males interested in kink than  females.  This swings the balance of power.  Even if the ratio is as low as 2:1, the woman is still doing the choosing between her two options.

Again, I agree, but I think that women should be at least *mindful* of the balance of power. That's all I ask.  





LadyHibiscus -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 10:54:58 AM)

I want to know what munches LP goes to. I have been to more than a few such in the last 20 years where the number of male subs that would admit as much = 0. And if they won't admit themselves, they are of precious little use, aren't they?

And OP, yes indeedy, many who profess to be male subs are in fact creepy leering things who cannot carry on a conversation about anything other than their desires. If you consider a conversation to be something like "I like <action>, will you <action> me?" "No, thank you."

It's sad, really, but such is the reality behind the stereotype. I am of the mind that there are an equal number of male dominants with the same issues, only their conversations run differently. [;)]




rulemylife -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 10:59:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BonesFromAsh


You know, it's funny...one of the first things I ask a man who contacts me here to do is to tell me who he is beyond the label and the kink. Rarely do I get a response that doesn't include his list of kink/sexual wants first and foremost.

It would seem, according to the OP, that in order to be taken serious, I should be charging a fee. Sad really.


You know, it's funny, but one of the first things I get asked by women on this site is what I can do for them financially.

Most do charge a fee.

Sad reality.








LadyHibiscus -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:06:53 AM)

The thing is, Rulemylife, not too many of the women on the other side are actually what we like to term "lifestyle".




sexyred1 -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:08:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KneelingSub25


I hope that in twenty or thirty years, there will be as many male subs as female subs attending these lifestyle events.  Maybe one day a male submissive can have the same expectations as a female submissive on CollarMe and other sites. Until then, when I think of "lifestyle Dominants" and "real-time D/s," I think of people like you."



What are those same expectations?

I get really tired of men thinking that women other any proclivity have it so much easier than they do.

I guess it depends on what you are seeking. If you just want casual, then sure, I imagine women do have it somewhat easier.

But when it comes to finding a serious relationship, I don't find any sex has it easier.




KneelingSub25 -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:14:39 AM)

SexyRed, that's an EXCELLENT question! 

Let me turn the question around.  What are the expectations of a female submissive? 

In my opinion,

1.  That she be respected.

2.  That the Dom listens to her and understands her as a human being. 

3.  That there is a special chemistry between the Dom and the sub. 

4.  That her limits are respected. 

5. That she feels special.  (among other things)

What do many lifestyle Fem Dommes think that the male sub's "expectations" should be?

Once again, this is my opinion:

1. That he needs to work very, very, very hard to prove that he is worthy of being her submissive.

2. That if he makes any mistakes, he stands the risk of being immediately dismissed.  

3. That because there are so many fish in the sea, he should be grateful for any attention he gets. 

Do you see a difference?




LadyPact -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:19:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I want to know what munches LP goes to.

Various locations through a number of states.  CO, GA, CA, SC, NC, and AK through various years. 




LillyBoPeep -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:22:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KneelingSub25

3. That because there are so many fish in the sea, he should be grateful for any attention he gets. 




i have actually seen female dominants use this to justify their own bad behavior towards male subs. but also, as a female sub you get to deal with knuckle draggers who think they can mistreat you just because you're an XX and some goony "natural order" thing tells them that, as men, they should rule the world. =p

all you do, though, is you don't associate with people who have expectations that don't line up with yours.

you CAN have the same expectations that female subs prattle about; just hold onto them until someone who fits you comes along. most of the female dominants i've met in real-time have those same expectations. they don't apply a double-standard rule that male subs need to put up with their 24/7 PMS -- there's a minority of really shitty people who do, and it seems like a lot of these people wind up online -- PROBABLY because no one will take them seriously in person anymore. =p

what, to you, constitutes "balance" when it comes to the perception of male subs? i'm referencing this section of your exchange with LadyPact --
quote:


quote:


This part, I do agree with.  The problem on this one is how male subs are perceived when first entering the lifestyle.  A good percentage of them spawn their interests from their sexual desires alone, relying more on fantasy than reality.  There's no balance in it.  Women tend to look more at the overall picture.


This is fine, but I guess my issue is this: how do you filter?  There's nothing wrong with filtering, but I personally wish it were done in a more balanced way. 


part of dealing with real life is understanding what odds you're up against. even if you had nothing to do with the creation of them, you still have to deal with the fallout from them. if you meet a person who has only met the leering, creepy, drooling "do me" male subs, then you may have an uphill battle, sure -- but you can decide whether you want to bother changing their opinion or not. and you don't have to do a bunch of complicated acrobatics to do it -- if you really are a cool person, simply being yourself will show it. and if a chick who says she's a Domme wants you to play silly games to get a smidge of attention, you can decide if you want to put up with that. you don't have to. you can walk away.





sexyred1 -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:24:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: KneelingSub25

SexyRed, that's an EXCELLENT question! 

Let me turn the question around.  What are the expectations of a female submissive? 

In my opinion,

1.  That she be respected.

2.  That the Dom listens to her and understands her as a human being. 

3.  That there is a special chemistry between the Dom and the sub. 

4.  That her limits are respected. 

5. That she feels special.  (among other things)

What do many lifestyle Fem Dommes think that the male sub's "expectations" should be?

Once again, this is my opinion:

1. That he needs to work very, very, very hard to prove that he is worthy of being her submissive.

2. That if he makes any mistakes, he stands the risk of being immediately dismissed.  

3. That because there are so many fish in the sea, he should be grateful for any attention he gets. 

Do you see a difference?



I agree that everyone should have the same expectations if they are seeking relationships.

I am sorry you ran into a specific type of person, but as you have read, not every Domme is the same or behaves the same.




LadyConstanze -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:24:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1


What are those same expectations?

I get really tired of men thinking that women other any proclivity have it so much easier than they do.

I guess it depends on what you are seeking. If you just want casual, then sure, I imagine women do have it somewhat easier.

But when it comes to finding a serious relationship, I don't find any sex has it easier.


Gawd, yes, reminds me of a conversation, a friend of mine is over overly blessed in the boobage department, to the point of having really bad back problems and not easily finding bras (I think she requires an H to J bra, depending on the make but is quite slim with only a 36 underbust), she was telling me that she is seriously thinking about surgery as it's such a strain on her back and a lot of guys just stare at her chest, a guy overheard us and said 'But you must love all the attention you're getting from men' - we just looked at him and he realized that he just *might* have said the wrong thing...




LillyBoPeep -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:26:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1


But when it comes to finding a serious relationship, I don't find any sex has it easier.


that's also been my observation.




sexyred1 -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:28:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1


What are those same expectations?

I get really tired of men thinking that women other any proclivity have it so much easier than they do.

I guess it depends on what you are seeking. If you just want casual, then sure, I imagine women do have it somewhat easier.

But when it comes to finding a serious relationship, I don't find any sex has it easier.


Gawd, yes, reminds me of a conversation, a friend of mine is over overly blessed in the boobage department, to the point of having really bad back problems and not easily finding bras (I think she requires an H to J bra, depending on the make but is quite slim with only a 36 underbust), she was telling me that she is seriously thinking about surgery as it's such a strain on her back and a lot of guys just stare at her chest, a guy overheard us and said 'But you must love all the attention you're getting from men' - we just looked at him and he realized that he just *might* have said the wrong thing...



The grass or boobs always looks greener from someone else's perspective. People never empathize with the other side.




LadyPact -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 11:49:36 AM)

OK.  One more and then I have other things to do.
quote:

ORIGINAL: KneelingSub25

SexyRed, that's an EXCELLENT question! 

Let me turn the question around.  What are the expectations of a female submissive? 

In my opinion,

1.  That she be respected.

If you think this is different in the Domm/sub world, I would suggest that there might be too much influence of the stereotype influenced by porn in the matter.  If there's a soul on this planet that believes I don't have respect for clip, I would ask them to present the evidence.

quote:

2.  That the Dom listens to her and understands her as a human being. 

No difference in genders.  This depends entirely on the quality of the Dominant.


quote:

3.  That there is a special chemistry between the Dom and the sub. 

You lost Me on this one.  It's a case of not looking at the whole picture.  I would contend that service only dynamics do not require "chemistry".

quote:

4.  That her limits are respected. 

Any decent top is going to do this.  Don't tilt at windmills.

quote:

5. That she feels special.  (among other things)

Any conscientious partner can make someone feel special.  It's not that difficult.

What do many lifestyle Fem Dommes think that the male sub's "expectations" should be?

Once again, this is my opinion:

quote:

1. That he needs to work very, very, very hard to prove that he is worthy of being her submissive.

I disagree.  It may take more effort to be noticed, at least at an introductory level.

quote:

2. That if he makes any mistakes, he stands the risk of being immediately dismissed.  

You almost got Me on this one.  Mistakes?  No.  Willful disobedience, refusing to submit to the predetermined authority structure, etc..... Yes.  In truth, this is no different than your average, ordinary relationship.  Any healthy relationship has such boundaries.  For example, I absolutely would divorce MP for certain "one strike and you're out" situations.  I love him dearly, but if he ever harmed Me intentionally in anger, I can promise you that this marriage would be over.

quote:

3. That because there are so many fish in the sea, he should be grateful for any attention he gets. 

There are a lot of fish in the sea.  In the kink world, I think a lot of people should recognize that.  This isn't to say people shouldn't look at the whole picture.  It really isn't that hard to stand out.  In My opinion, if males focused on that more, they would be in a better position.

quote:

Do you see a difference?

In discussing this thread, do you?




PeonForHer -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 12:06:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

. . . a guy overheard us and said 'But you must love all the attention you're getting from men' - we just looked at him and he realized that he just *might* have said the wrong thing...



Well, an understandable reaction on yours and your friend's part.

However, a friend of mine has very big boobs and she'd always felt that a man who thought her boobs were attractive was, for that reason alone and by definition, 'the wrong sort of man'. A low and rought sort of man, that is. Women with long legs seem to be wholly proud of the attractiveness of these appendages to men; women with big boobs, though, don't. That can seem quite an odd contradiction to a lot of males.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 12:16:01 PM)

I love my big boobs, and I expect them to be noticed, since they precede me everywhere, but they are not my ONLY feature... I don't care for being singled out for having a rack.




LadyConstanze -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 12:16:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Women with long legs seem to be wholly proud of the attractiveness of these appendages to men; women with big boobs, though, don't. That can seem quite an odd contradiction to a lot of males.


Most guys don't talk exclusively to the legs... I'm nowhere as blessed as my friend but not quite boyish in build and I can tell you that I get quite annoyed if a guy only talks to my cleavage, I have been known to make little snide comments like pointing to my eyes and requesting "Please speak this way" or "Have you noticed I have a face?" because it's annoying if guys just stare below your neck. You know, I'd like to think I've got a nice bum and good legs, but so far I have not met a guy who spoke exclusively to my legs or my bum... It's not about guys liking breasts, I would hope that any guy who's into me also likes my boobs, but I don't want to be reduced to a pair of tits with a female being attached to them...




LillyBoPeep -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 12:17:07 PM)

sometimes when a person experiences a lot of objectification over a body part, they overreact out of self-defense. ANYONE who says anything about that body part gets lumped in with the people who objectified her. it's kind of standard, though it is, i guess, contradictory.
like i've relaxed some on my "anyone who mentions i'm brown = BAD!" rule; the rule got built up out of overreaction to raceplayers and race fetishists. but i realized that not everyone who just mentioned my skin color was one of those people. =p

sometimes people do go too far with their personal hang-ups, and it's up to them to figure that out. it's possible to miss out on interesting things when you're controlled by fear or anxiety, whatever.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 12:27:43 PM)

I have a corset with a lace-up section in the front that reveals the cleavage. I've taken to wearing a sleeveless body under it because even my well behaved male friends were behaving in a very unseemly manner when the girls were too prominently displayed. EW!!

And I looked damn good with that corset, too. Nice black leather... hmph.




OttersSwim -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 12:34:01 PM)

This topic is just the tits!  People should totally pay for it!  [;)]




LaTigresse -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 12:40:34 PM)

Interesting twist it's taken for sure.

First we are discussing how a Financial Dominant is more attentive to prospective clients than a Lifestyle Dominant is to prospective partners.........well.....DUHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

Then we go on about there being a gender difference, again DUHHHHHH!!!!!

And now we are talking about men's obsession with tits.......another DUHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

What next?[:D]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625