KneelingSub25 -> RE: In Defense of Financial Domination (7/13/2011 10:47:00 AM)
|
LadyPact, first I want to thank you for taking the time to think about what I wrote and not just launch into an ad hominem attack regarding my bias. Like I have said repeatedly, I'm not pretending to be objective here. I am stating my opinion, and I welcome other people's opinions. Thank you for responding constructively. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact I want to preface this by saying that I am replying in this particular style *not* with the intention to pick your post apart. You've got some points where I agree, some I don't agree, and some that I'm teetering on the brink. You did want discussion, right? It's fine to disagree with me. I invite discussion! quote:
ORIGINAL: KneelingSub25 I had intense sexual fantasies of being dominated. We'd probably have some debate about fantasies = living. Not the point of your thread, so I'll move forward. Your point is well taken, but I did experiment in High School, too. Most of the domination was online, though. quote:
Over the years I've met about a dozen "lifestyle" Dommes from CollarMe for real-time play, but the vast majority of my D/s experiences have been online. This is probably part of the issue. Agreed. I will not deny that my real-time experience is very, very limited, which might distort my perspective. quote:
A few things struck me. First, I noticed that the majority of people attending were male Doms and female subs. In a crowd of 20 or 30 people, I may have been one of only 2 male subs present. I normally wouldn't split a paragraph, but this is contradictory to My experience. I don't think I've *ever* been to a munch where only two sub males attended. I think it would shock Me beyond belief. Very interesting. I would like to hear other people's perspective on this. quote:
Second, I detected a general perception of "male subs" that was quite different from the perception of "female subs." This part, I do agree with. The problem on this one is how male subs are perceived when first entering the lifestyle. A good percentage of them spawn their interests from their sexual desires alone, relying more on fantasy than reality. There's no balance in it. Women tend to look more at the overall picture. This is fine, but I guess my issue is this: how do you filter? There's nothing wrong with filtering, but I personally wish it were done in a more balanced way. quote:
Let me preface this by saying a few things: everyone was very, very nice to me. They were friendly, open, genuine, and had a sense of humor (acquired through years of life experience). In truth, they were good people, and they were quite accepting of me. So, nothing that I am about to say is a reflection on them. It is a reflection on the lifestyle generally. I didn't snip this out based solely on the fact that I'm glad you said it. Too often, folks complain about the reception that they receive at a munch. That they found the atmosphere clique-y or they feel that people should have been falling all over themselves to greet the new person, paying no attention to anybody else. Kudos on this. Thank you! quote:
One female sub said, "it's good to finally meet a male submissive with a personality." I inquired further. "Lots of male subs are...just kind of creepy: they don't say anything, they leer at women, and they just want to get sexual." Would she have said the same thing about shy female subs? This kind of makes Me wonder just how many male subs in established dynamics this particular woman has met. It sounds as though her experiences with male subs are based more on the stereotype, driven by first encounters with fantasists, had a great influence in forming her opinions. Agreed. quote:
Here's what I think: the majority of women in the "lifestyle" (Dominant women, submissive women, switch women) seem to regard males as unnecessary/useless/superfluous until proven otherwise. That is to say, they believe it is the duty of the male to capture the woman's attention (whether it be for D/s play or for friendship). This relates equally to male subs and male Doms. The truth is, in the enlightened age of feminism, women and men are not treated equally in the D/s lifestyle. So much to cover here! Gender aside, I don't happen to think anyone "needs" some great fulfillment that *must* be provided by an outside, unknown party. I believe that healthy people are perfectly capable of finding self-fulfillment, happiness, and joy without dependency on another human being to create those things for them. There is a difference between *wanting* to share your life with another person, instead of *needing* them to fill a void. I do agree that males do find themselves needing to capture the attention of the female. This is true in nature and is only emphasized with the imbalance of the D/s world. A strong, confident woman is not lacking for attention. If a male does not step up to become noticed, I can promise that someone else will be. No. Males and females are *not* treated equally within the D/s lifestyle. It absolutely is a woman's market, side of the kneel not withstanding. This is the very reason that female submissives have a greater opportunity of selection, have more options in selecting partners, etc than males do. There have *always* been more males interested in kink than females. This swings the balance of power. Even if the ratio is as low as 2:1, the woman is still doing the choosing between her two options. Again, I agree, but I think that women should be at least *mindful* of the balance of power. That's all I ask.
|
|
|
|