Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile'

Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

farglebargle -> Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 5:36:08 AM)
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/fox-news-contributor-declares-hes-not-pedoph "I assure you I'm not a pedophile at all," Ablow objected.

Marc2b -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 7:06:20 AM)
In a low blow, she suggested that he might be... why wouldn't he deny it? As for the breast feeding doll... it's silly but hardly the dire threat to civilization this Ablow (what an unfortunate name) guy thinks it is. I don't give a shit about Fox News one way or the other but some people around here seem so obsessed with it that it borders on the ludicrous. If there is some other - legitimate! - evidence that he is a pediophile, that's one thing... but in the absence of such evidence, there is no story here other than the usual (in my best Elemer Fudd impersonation) "oooooohhhhh, we hate that rascally Fox News, we hate 'em, we hate 'em, we hate 'em!" Just because someone works for Fox News, it doesn't automatically make them a lowlife scumbag. I know that that is a dificult concept for you to grasp... but it's true. If you want to dislike the guy for his political opinions, go ahead... but is it necessary to demonize him?

willbeurdaddy -> Good Housekeeping and Mens Fitness contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 8:10:40 AM)
More nonsense from the hopelessly confused.

LillyBoPeep -> RE: Good Housekeeping and Mens Fitness contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 8:15:09 AM)
nothing in what he said sounded like he was a pedophile to me. he just views breasts through a sexual lens like the VAST majority of people on earth, particularly males. a lot of kids pretend to nurse teddy bears, so that doll really isn't that threatening. but some people have an issue seeing breasts as functional and harmless rather than purely "entertainment," which is probably the bigger problem to be worried about.

rulemylife -> RE: Good Housekeeping and Mens Fitness contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 10:11:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy More nonsense from the hopelessly confused. More one-line nonsense that you hopelessly bore us with.

Owner59 -> RE: Good Housekeeping and Mens Fitness contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 10:12:58 AM)
It`s a fairly clear difference of POV.Not much over-lap. One see`s nature,normal make pretend play, that kids do and is healthy. The other sees sexual deviation and dark scenarios. What does he think kids have dolls for?To pretend to be parents,who they will become someday,hopefully. Why do kids pretend to be nurses?Because they want to be caring and this kind of "play" is normal. Kids also play army(I did),build forts(I did),build tree houses(I did) and all kinds of make pretend things from race-car driver to fireman. And WTF is about with his over the top extreme bull shit example of a realistic birthing doll? Sounds like a typical closed minded conservative,using the bullshit argument that if we legalize gay marriage,we`ll be seeing people marry goats and cows next.More political than medical. No he`s not a pedophile but his mind`s in the gutter.Note,he was one who used the word.He brought it up. Another "fair and balanced" debate brought to you by fox......[8\|].Though the "debate" was more of a ratings stunt than a forum to inform,purposely.

slvemike4u -> RE: Good Housekeeping and Mens Fitness contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 10:45:56 AM)
The guy is most definitely an asshole....that was confirmed when he found the need to deny being a pedophile. He would have been better off disregarding her snarky remark...far better than what he chose to do...which was to step right into it.

mnottertail -> RE: Faux Nuze pedophile insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 10:51:37 AM)
Yeah, Nixon found it necessary to say, 'I am not a crook.'

BitaTruble -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 11:11:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marc2b As for the breast feeding doll... it's silly but hardly the dire threat to civilization this Ablow (what an unfortunate name) guy thinks it is. Why do you think it's silly? Little girls have been pretending to feed their baby dolls with a bottle for decades. What's the difference.. or is there one? Perhaps you think that's silly as well? Breast feeding fosters bonding between mother and child, gives colostrum to infants for a few days before milk kicks in which is better for the baby as it provides antibodies to fight disease, it's lower in fat and higher in protein than regular milk. Plus breast milk is FREE and formula is very, very expensive. I think this product should be applauded for showing little girls alternatives to bottles which are much, much better for their future babies. GI Joe dolls teach our young children that war is entertaining and fun. That blowing things up and killing others is good.. and that is beyond silly. I guess perspective really has a lot to do with it, huh?

mnottertail -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 11:14:35 AM)
Yeah, first of all I don't get this sexuality and kids stuff, kids are born sexual they dont know what to do with it, agreed......and if we were a little more open about real life (after all its natural) we might have a great deal less easy prey for pedophiles and alot more horror removed out of childrens lives.

GrizzlyBear -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 11:25:29 AM)
If little girls get dolls to imitate their parents, how many little girls these days are in a home where mom breastfeeds a younger sibling? I bet those girls are already imitating Mom with whatever dolls they have. So... a doll that breastfeeds, how cool is that! Does it actually suck? If so, will the little girls that play with it eventually get eroticized nipples? And what will come next - Nursing Mother Barbie, complete with stretch marks, sagging udders that drip milk, and a Ken Jr. infant doll to suck on them? How about anatomically correct genitalia? A Ken doll with a woody? I didn't hear anything that made me think Ablow was a pedophile. Now, the person who designed that doll, there is a very real possibility there. Can you imagine product testing? I can also see how all this could freak out the prudes that think anything sexual is filth that rots the brain. So - pedophile no, prude for sure. Nothing surprising about that coming from a conservative commentator.

popeye1250 -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 11:39:41 AM)
Has Chris Matthews ever denied that he was a pedophile?

mnottertail -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 11:41:14 AM)
I think he is waiting for your denial, popeye. Matter or protocol.

Marc2b -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 11:44:38 AM)
quote: Why do you think it's silly? Little girls have been pretending to feed their baby dolls with a bottle for decades. What's the difference.. or is there one? Perhaps you think that's silly as well? Breast feeding fosters bonding between mother and child, gives colostrum to infants for a few days before milk kicks in which is better for the baby as it provides antibodies to fight disease, it's lower in fat and higher in protein than regular milk. Plus breast milk is FREE and formula is very, very expensive. I think this product should be applauded for showing little girls alternatives to bottles which are much, much better for their future babies. GI Joe dolls teach our young children that war is entertaining and fun. That blowing things up and killing others is good.. and that is beyond silly. I guess perspective really has a lot to do with it, huh? I didn't say breast feeding was silly (nor would I) nor did I say that little girls pretending to breast feed was silly... I said the doll was silly. It is silly for the same reason that those dolls that "eat" or "piss" are silly. They're not really needed. All a kid needs is an object and some imagination. My niece is currently breastfeeding her newborn and I've seen her four year old daughter "breastfeeding" her teddy bear.

Anaxagoras -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 11:45:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marc2b I don't give a shit about Fox News one way or the other but some people around here seem so obsessed with it that it borders on the ludicrous. If there is some other - legitimate! - evidence that he is a pediophile, that's one thing... but in the absence of such evidence, there is no story here other than the usual (in my best Elemer Fudd impersonation) "oooooohhhhh, we hate that rascally Fox News, we hate 'em, we hate 'em, we hate 'em!" Just a thought but I think the mods should consider starting a new forum section called "Fox Watch" into which all treads giving out about Fox should go. quote: Just because someone works for Fox News, it doesn't automatically make them a lowlife scumbag. I know that that is a dificult concept for you to grasp... but it's true. If you want to dislike the guy for his political opinions, go ahead... but is it necessary to demonize him? Yes, unfortunately for them it is necessary.

Marc2b -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 12:27:08 PM)
quote: Just a thought but I think the mods should consider starting a new forum section called "Fox Watch" into which all treads giving out about Fox should go. Sometimes I think we need an exclusive thread for those dozen or so Posters (I don't think I need to name names) who spend most of their posting time telling each other how stupid they are. They can then dispense with all of the political BS that usually starts the shit flinging contest and just get down to business: You're stupid! No, you're stupid! You're stupid times a thousand! You're stupid times a million! You're stupid times ifinity! You're stupid times ifinity plus one!

BitaTruble -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 12:32:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marc2b I didn't say breast feeding was silly (nor would I) nor did I say that little girls pretending to breast feed was silly... I said the doll was silly. It is silly for the same reason that those dolls that "eat" or "piss" are silly. They're not really needed. All a kid needs is an object and some imagination. My niece is currently breastfeeding her newborn and I've seen her four year old daughter "breastfeeding" her teddy bear. I got that you were talking about the doll and it was the doll about which I was asking. Toys are silly because they are not needed. Got it. Thank you for answering my question. It's a legit reason. Maybe I should adopt that stance myself.. would save a ton of money on bday and Xmas presents for the grandsons. ::grins:: Eh.. nah. Guess not. For me it isn't about giving kids stuff they need. That's for the parents. I'm the grandma.. I'm going to give out the silly stuff they actually want... you know.. within reason. ::wink::

mnottertail -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 12:34:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marc2b You're stupid times ifinity! You're stupid times ifinity plus one! Its spelled infinity you stupid socialist. LOL.

domiguy -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 12:40:16 PM)
I personally wish they would close down this fucking rat trap. It is bogged down by the likes of FatDD, pos, wilbur, azzbossman, truckinslave servant4use and a pile of other boneheads that have no ability or desire to have a meaningful exchange. They are incapable of going anywhere outside of this forum and participating in any meaningful type of conversation.

lockedaway -> RE: Fox News contributor insists he's 'not a pedophile' (7/20/2011 12:43:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy I personally wish they would close down this fucking rat trap. It is bogged down by the likes of FatDD, pos, wilbur, azzbossman, truckinslave servant4use and a pile of other boneheads that have no ability or desire to have a meaningful exchange. They are incapable of going anywhere outside of this forum and participating in any meaningful type of exchange. LOLOLOL look who is talking? What a buffoon! You come in with your liberal, entitlement, got-your-hand-out bullshit and give these one sentence insults that add nothing to the thread. You never fail to be partisan. You never post a cite. Nothing!!!

Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875