RE: I Admit It I........ (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

Aileen1968 -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 3:05:11 PM)

No snarkiness at all. For some reason your font shows as being really dark and really small. I have to struggle to read it and often I skip over it for that reason alone.



LafayetteLady -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 3:05:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PainCompliant
Exact same risk as in the situation of someone having a heart attack during a consentual flogging. If two consenting adults understand the risk what is it to you?  Another judgmental assumption - any top into what I seek is a "poor fool"?



Not near the exact same risk. During a consensual flogging (or just plain sex) when a heart attack occurs, the top is there to take steps to help. With you chained to a wall and no one home, the only thing the top is going to get upon discovery is arrested.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

The fact that YOU don't get to dictate what any "master" you find will do is what you just don't understand.
That's very true, but what you don't seem to understand is that he is perfectly within his rights to look for a Master who wants to do the things he wants done. Isn't that the same advice that is given to all the sub girls who don't want to be whipped every day?

What is it about this guy that has you so annoyed? He didn't ask anybody to discuss his kink, nor for stories about it. He asked if anybody knew of some devices that would make it possible. From his replies he seems well aware that he's hunting unicorns, but so what. He knows what he wants, let him go look for it. He isn't here looking for wank fodder, he hasn't asked anybody to do anything with him, for him, or to him.

PainCompliant, it's going to be really hard to find the master you're after. I sincerely hope you two find each other before too long. Best of luck.



Actually, there is a difference between looking for someone who shares your kink interests and dictating what the dominant will do. That's discussed a lot on the Ask a Mistress board. The "here is my kink, add dominant and stir" mentality is not likely to ever work for those "longer periods of time" the OP is looking for.

Personally, I couldn't care less what the OP is looking for, myself, as well as other posters here, are only pointing out what are obvious problems with what he is looking for.

I'm never going to think it is ok, or condone someone who is looking for something that has the very real potential of causing legal problems for someone else.




Awareness -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 3:08:19 PM)

  Aileen there are a number of options which can probably make this easier on you, but the simplest which operates in most browsers is to hold down the control key and spin the mouse wheel up and down to dynamically change the font size.

It's global, so it operates on everything on the page, but you could probably just do it quickly for anything which seems too small.



agirl -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 3:10:43 PM)

 How ia this?
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

No snarkiness at all. For some reason your font shows as being really dark and really small. I have to struggle to read it and often I skip over it for that reason alone.


Kk, understood. I tried all sorts of stuff in the *try it out forum* and it didn't gain a single response. There's only so much ya can do.

For a game.... is THIS ok for you lot?

The brown cow jumped over the lazy ill-trained dog?

Hint.....the brown dog sentence is the one requiring comments.

agirl



NuevaVida -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 3:17:00 PM)

agirl your font is usually teeny tiny to me too for some reason but your test font looks perfect. For what it's worth [:)]



Aileen1968 -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 3:17:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

  Aileen there are a number of options which can probably make this easier on you, but the simplest which operates in most browsers is to hold down the control key and spin the mouse wheel up and down to dynamically change the font size.

It's global, so it operates on everything on the page, but you could probably just do it quickly for anything which seems too small.



Ha...that made it seem like I just did some majorly great drugs.

Agirl...the brown cow ssentence matched everyone elses font.



Aileen1968 -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 3:21:30 PM)

I think we all just topped from the bottom....



LadyPact -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 3:43:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PainCompliant
Exact same risk as in the situation of someone having a heart attack during a consentual flogging. If two consenting adults understand the risk what is it to you?  Another judgmental assumption - any top into what I seek is a "poor fool"?

OP, I do apologize for getting your sexual orientation incorrect.  That was My fault.

However, the highlighted isn't really the truth of the matter.  Should someone have a heart attack during a consensual flogging, the person who was doing the flogging is literally right there.  That person can call 911 and administer CPR until help arrives. 

There isn't a huge legal risk (if any) to the top with your GPS idea.  If you drop dead while carrying a cell phone that tracks your whereabouts, nobody's going to have a legal issue from that.  All fine and dandy for when you are out.  This changes a little from what you describe you want to do when you are in.

You mentioned earlier that you would be chained to something so you couldn't get out and the top could "go about their day".  Well, they could, as long as going about their day means they don't leave the house.  In a sense, you're imprisoning them as well as yourself because if they leave, the risks change for that top dramatically.  Fires and/or heart attacks don't have to happen every day.  It only has to happen once.  When the fire department finds your body, the top involved doesn't get a free pass from the legal system because you consented while you were alive.  Finding a Master who's willing to risk that jail sentence is going to be tough, in My opinion.





kalikshama -> RE: GPS Tracking - Don't trust, verify (7/27/2011 4:29:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: agirl

 How ia this?
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

No snarkiness at all. For some reason your font shows as being really dark and really small. I have to struggle to read it and often I skip over it for that reason alone.


Kk, understood. I tried all sorts of stuff in the *try it out forum* and it didn't gain a single response. There's only so much ya can do.

For a game.... is THIS ok for you lot?

The brown cow jumped over the lazy ill-trained dog?

Hint.....the brown dog sentence is the one requiring comments.

agirl



Your normal font (size="1") is too small for me in either Opera or Firefox, but your brown cow font is the standard size.

Thanks Aileen for bringing this up!

Thanks Awareness for your workaround!






HeatherMcLeather -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 6:32:18 PM)

quote:

Actually, there is a difference between looking for someone who shares your kink interests and dictating what the dominant will do. That's discussed a lot on the Ask a Mistress board. The "here is my kink, add dominant and stir" mentality is not likely to ever work for those "longer periods of time" the OP is looking for.
I agree that there is a difference between those two attitudes, however it would seem you are unable to discern the difference when it is placed in front of you. Perhaps if you took the time to understand what was posted on those many threads and more importantly, why it was posted, you would be able to. The OP has agreed with you that he's not likely to find what he wants, but that he doesn't want anything less than this sort of cruel unyielding control. Again, how is this, in essence, any different than a female sub saying she isn't going to settle for anything less than a "firm master who will use me like the slut I am but love me too" which seems to get so much approval and support?

quote:

Personally, I couldn't care less what the OP is looking for, myself, as well as other posters here, are only pointing out what are obvious problems with what he is looking for.
Which he has pretty much admitted, so why do you feel the need to continue to harp on it and belittle him. He only wanted to know if it was technologically possible, not if it was your cup of tea.

quote:

I'm never going to think it is ok, or condone someone who is looking for something that has the very real potential of causing legal problems for someone else.
So that's why I see you posting all over the boards telling people not to engage in whipping, spanking, bondage, oral sex, anal sex, homosexual activities, pretty much all of WIITWD. All of which are illegal in various jurisdictions in the U.S.

I find your sanctimonious holier-then-thou attitude in this thread really annoying.



littlewonder -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 6:43:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

Hopping in late, and most likely waaaaay off topic with the current discussion, I am all for GPS tracking-not cuz I don't trust her, but because I just think the idea is hawthawthawt.
Grins.
Course, when the lilone and I were talking about it last night I did mention that if I chipped her, I'd want to have an electric shock option(like dog collars have) that I could remotely activate from anywhere.
Hehehehehehehehe.
That would be so much fun.



(She, ahem, shockingly felt differently)



eerrmm...ok so I was wrong [:o]

<whispers under her breath....as much as he wants to believe it I still don't think he'd have time in his busy schedule [8D] >




LafayetteLady -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 6:56:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Actually, there is a difference between looking for someone who shares your kink interests and dictating what the dominant will do. That's discussed a lot on the Ask a Mistress board. The "here is my kink, add dominant and stir" mentality is not likely to ever work for those "longer periods of time" the OP is looking for.
I agree that there is a difference between those two attitudes, however it would seem you are unable to discern the difference when it is placed in front of you. Perhaps if you took the time to understand what was posted on those many threads and more importantly, why it was posted, you would be able to. The OP has agreed with you that he's not likely to find what he wants, but that he doesn't want anything less than this sort of cruel unyielding control. Again, how is this, in essence, any different than a female sub saying she isn't going to settle for anything less than a "firm master who will use me like the slut I am but love me too" which seems to get so much approval and support?

quote:

Personally, I couldn't care less what the OP is looking for, myself, as well as other posters here, are only pointing out what are obvious problems with what he is looking for.
Which he has pretty much admitted, so why do you feel the need to continue to harp on it and belittle him. He only wanted to know if it was technologically possible, not if it was your cup of tea.

quote:

I'm never going to think it is ok, or condone someone who is looking for something that has the very real potential of causing legal problems for someone else.
So that's why I see you posting all over the boards telling people not to engage in whipping, spanking, bondage, oral sex, anal sex, homosexual activities, pretty much all of WIITWD. All of which are illegal in various jurisdictions in the U.S.

I find your sanctimonious holier-then-thou attitude in this thread really annoying.


It's called a calculated risk Heather. While all those things in bold may be illegal, the odds of a life term if something goes wrong is unlikely.

Nope, I don't believe in the concept of "hey, that's your kink, so go for it," just because it's not my thing. I said the same thing about the whole "feeding" kink, forced anorexia kinks, and would say the same for people who wanted to play russian roulette firing a gun at their s-type just for kicks.

The whole "your kink is not my kink, but go for it" idea goes out the window when it completely lacks consideration of the others involved. When someone wants to get involved in nailing, fire play and the like, I'm far from the only one who is saying "think very carefully and really research what you are getting involved in."

In this case, we have a bottom wanting to essentially imprison the top with his kinks. LP is saying the same thing as me, and so is LC. Yet you are only upset at my post. In the words of your lady love, "get the fuck over it."



HannahLynHeather -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/27/2011 7:13:17 PM)

quote:

LP is saying the same thing as me, and so is LC. Yet you are only upset at my post.
or not. maybe you should go back and look at what the fuck it was that you said that she responded to, rather than verbally flailing about like an epilepetic walrus.

she used a comment you made to make a point, you replied to that and she replied to you. if you don't want people to reply to you, then don't fucking reply to them . if you don't want people to say your preachy tone annoys them, then don't use a preachy tone. pretty fucking simple, no?

now its time for you to listen to and take to heart the words of her lady love. get the fuck over both it and yourself.



KMsAngel -> RE: GPS Tracking - Don't trust, verify (7/27/2011 11:01:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

That's okay, after being grilled for 25 hours by the RCMP for a little missunderstanding over a small tiny minuscule truck load of AK47 ammo your government isn't too keen on me either.


bastards. probably precludes you from entering here, as well. allies and all that.

bad bad michael

oops, to keep on topic, i'm far too paranoid to have GPS activated on my phone, and would have issues if i was required to do so.



chiaThePet -> RE: GPS Tracking - Don't trust, verify (7/28/2011 1:55:58 AM)


GPS device? Are you kidding me here?

With total amputation your Dominants will know exactly who's rollin, rollin, rollin, rawhide.

Amateurs.

chia* (the pet)



Iamsemisweet -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/28/2011 7:37:29 AM)

Speaking of why you never leave a bound and helpless person alone:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43744222/ns/us_news-weird_news/



leadership527 -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/28/2011 8:06:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
shakes head...another person living in a fantasy world who just doesn't get it and refuses to get it.

Interestingly, PC thinks we are all living in a fantasy. As near as I can tell, those of us involved in internal enslavement (much as I hate that phrase) see external control as make believe. PC sees it exactly the other way around.

I have to admit, I don't really understand how external control can ever be more than pretend in a society that does not allow non-consensual slavery but I suppose it's predictable that I don't "get it" since I'm in the IE camp.



agirl -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/28/2011 8:58:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Aileen there are a number of options which can probably make this easier on you, but the simplest which operates in most browsers is to hold down the control key and spin the mouse wheel up and down to dynamically change the font size.

It's global, so it operates on everything on the page, but you could probably just do it quickly for anything which seems too small.



Ha...that made it seem like I just did some majorly great drugs.

Agirl...the brown cow ssentence matched everyone elses font.


Thanks muchly Aileen and a special *thanks* to Awareness.

That little trick eliminated all the usual struggle I have to read all the normal size fonts. I can see perfectly well but I have some kind of weird sensory thing which means that I find all small, light fonts extremely frustrating.

Regards, agirl







LadyHibiscus -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/28/2011 9:09:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
shakes head...another person living in a fantasy world who just doesn't get it and refuses to get it.

Interestingly, PC thinks we are all living in a fantasy. As near as I can tell, those of us involved in internal enslavement (much as I hate that phrase) see external control as make believe. PC sees it exactly the other way around.

I have to admit, I don't really understand how external control can ever be more than pretend in a society that does not allow non-consensual slavery but I suppose it's predictable that I don't "get it" since I'm in the IE camp.



Exactly, Jeff. What purpose is submission that I have to endlessly enforce with some external means? That means that I would have a prisoner, not a submissive. I am LOVING the notion of the hot-button buzzer, and tracking someone to surprise them? HAWT. Otherwise I am just a prison guard.



leadership527 -> RE: I Admit It I........ (7/28/2011 12:36:18 PM)

But my point, LadyHibiscus, was that PC's view is not incorrect. It comes from a very different perspective than mine (and yours). But it's not like that is unusual or anything here in BDSM-land :) As near as I can tell he is trying to get as close to a non-consensual relationship as is feasible in a consensual relationship world. Honestly that isn't all that different from the "consensual non-consent" crowd in my book.



Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875