LadyHugs
Posts: 2299
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
Dear TolerableCruelty, Ladies and Gentlemen; As a dominant, I am approached much like you. I would not use the words "necessity" as like you said, I don't see a slave as a necessity, as I can take care of myself and others. Nor, would I select a word of "convenience." I rather choose the word as a slave or submissive being an enhancement to my life. Convenience is a bit of a harsh word in my mind's eyes. True, slaves make it more convenient for me to operate in my mastery. At times, being served and or serving is convenient; just as much as it is not convenient. I would indeed wish to have a slave or more in my life, as they do give enhancement and enrich my knowledge and skill. If this is not found in the relationship, then it is not working for me, in my mind's eye. When another wishes to enter into an established household, to which I seem to gather is the case; I agree that those within the household must be involved in the process as it is the "household" that is enhanced or, could be the upset of an established harmony of a household. Perhaps you may consider, the words that implied that you were not the one to make the decision, thus coming into question who really was the dominant--you or the slave. Perhaps, the wording may have reflected that it would have to be a joint decision but, it would be that it would be your judgment to approve and or disapprove the union. After all, the slave/submissive seeks the collar from the dominant--not the slave. Yet, slaves hold the power to make life happy or miserable for the newcomer and most slaves/submissives who are keen observers know this to be true, as so many dominants fail to see such undercurrents until it comes to a boiling point. Respectfully submitted for consideration, Lady Hugs Respectfully submitted for consideration, Lady Hugs
|