xssve
Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009 Status: offline
|
People are raised with certain romantic notions, and it not just sexuality, but "lifestyle"etc., an abstract ideal of how thing ought to be, which doesn't often mesh with the reality of trying to stretch a paycheck, keep the bills paid, keep the house from falling apart, the laundry done, the kids fed, etc., etc., all of which is basically a lot of work and hair pulling, not very romantic at all. To top it all off, gender roles are in flux: is the woman makes more money than you do, is she the boss? Traditional roles are under assault from every direction, but mainly economic - thing is, people tend to attribute those things to cultural movements - the "culture wars" etc., it's the downside of conspiracy theory: it really isn't a female conspiracy, or a gay conspiracy, etc., I'm sure they're there, but they really don't have the clout to alter things to this extent - it's a stock market conspiracy, it just about cheap labor and making more profit. Anyway, despite the facts, it tends to get attributed to some shadowy social conspiracy, so social solutions tend to get proposed - a "slave contract" is not substantially different than the "contract marriage" of the religious conservatives, it's a band-aid solution but it makes the participants feel better, i.e., their roles are defined, it offers a promise of social stability, although it doesn't really change anything. Point is, for the most part, people crave stability, predictability - it's hard to develop expectations when things are constant flux, the best you can do is find a small group of people and decide that this is how it's going to be, regardless of what the rest of the world is doing - and taken from that standpoint, it's understandable. It's basically what we all do, we just don't all need to formalize it with an (unenforceable) contract. At worst, these people are fooling themselves if they think it has any future as an institution - a contract gives it that institutional cachet, and some sheen of institutional authority, and I suspect it appeals more to the authoritarian crowd - and it's fine, I'd rather they worked their kinks out that way, it's probably much healthier than the alternative, more right wingers should be doing it, IMO. In short, it's another form of role play - to some extent, it theoretically protects the Dom, because he/she at least has some proof that the relationship is consensual, but otherwise it basically satisfies the need to make it "official", the stamp of authority, kind of a bureaucratic fetish.
|