StrangerThan
Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet A nice gentleman Dom that I dated a couple of times a few months ago has sent me a few emails periodically that I have largely ignored. However, I did respond to one recently, primarily because he was obviously beating himself up as to why it didn't work out. After my response, he sent me an email asking to know the real reason. I am actually a little resentful about being put in this position, since I probably wouldn't dream of asking a similar question to someone I had only casually dated. So, how honest should I be? My reasons are not flattering, and I don't want to hurt his feelings. On the other hand, this man is very much into self awareness and improvement, which I admire. So, honesty or diplomacy? Or ignore this altogether? First, you owe him nothing. Casual dating does not extend to defining one's bad points, mediocre points, or even good points for them. Second, people who insist upon maintaining contact or attempting to generate it once the link has been broken always come across as a little creepy to me. I mean seriously, if you have parted ways from what was a casual involvement in the first place, the person who won't let go until they know every single detail of why, often seems to be willing to argue or debate those points. So he asked an honest question. So what? He is no more deserving of an answer than anyone else, especially since you apparently gave him one already, and he's now asking for the "real" reason. It leaves you in the position of how gently you let someone down or do you just smack them in the face with your version of the truth - which is what it is since your feeling is subjective to you and may mean absolutely nothing to the next person. If I chose to provide an answer, I'd qualify it up front. I'd tell him, if you want reasons, I'll give them to you but I'm not going to debate them. I'd let him know that what passed between us may have been something I enjoyed to a degree but chose not to pursue and as such, wasn't going to. If he came back and said tell me, I probably would. I'd also ignore any attempts to delve further or to talk around them, because my reasons are mine, not their's. Can you tell? I been there before. I'm not saying you have to turn your back on those in the past. I'm saying that when those in the past won't let go, sometimes you have to let go for them. I don't know which is the case for you. I do know that following that road can lead to more and more of the same if you're not careful.
_____________________________
--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain
|