ChatteParfaitt
Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011 From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana Status: offline
|
Insulting my intelligence doesn’t work on me, I don’t need you to validate who I am. That's wise, because such validation would be a long time forthcoming if your current output is any guide. You do understand that I don’t seek your validation, your agreement, or anything else. I don’t think I can change your skewed world view. I respond to you for one reason, b/c there might be someone new enough or naïve enough to buy into your drivel, and I feel duty bound to offer an alternate view. You will note I don’t bother to take you one when someone else (another aging domme perhaps?) has already done the work for me. I thought it was the pathetic male subs who were responsible for the thread hijacks. You did? Really? How odd. No, they seem to mainly do a lot of fawning. Or perhaps the delusional male doms who think having a dick somehow makes them special They're outnumbered by the delusional female dommes so, I somehow doubt it. Ho hum, please try harder to offend me, those are not worth my time. Most people are comprised of more that one character attribute. That you have one trait that supercedes all others doesn’t make you special, it makes you limited. Someone who possesses contrary character attributes isn't special, they're schizophrenic. Alleging you're somehow dominant but also submissive is stretching credulity. Obviously those with a reason to spin such tales will contend otherwise. Sorry my dear, everyone possesses contrary personality traits. It’s what makes us the flawed, imperfect, conundrum that is human. And yes, I even include you. As for dominant women - pfffft. All I see are weak men being led round by their balls. I've never seen a single male sub express any aspect of submission which isn't tied to getting his cock hard. They strike me as fetishists getting off and the 'dominant' women around the place are indulging them and thinking this somehow constitutes dominance. I remain unconvinced. How many female dominants or switches do you know in real life? And I mean really know? None. They're both mythological creatures as far as I'm concerned. I've yet to see any evidence in the real world or online which convinces me otherwise. Enough said. Your world view is not wildly divergent, it’s old fashioned and traditional and has been around for centuries. Your views are a throw back, nothing more. You have no idea what my world-view is. Attempting to disclaim something as old-fashioned and traditional is merely a tactic - it has no intrinsic validity to it, nor is it even remotely correct. Allow me to correct that, you world view as stated on these fora is not wildly divergent, it’s a throw back to centuries old stereotyping. And BTW, I don’t hate you, as I don’t even know you. If I feel anything it is pity. No, you hate that men exist who simply don't believe in your world-view. It's a common theme amongst specific types of women wherein they are not able to tolerate a divergent thought which doesn't match their own self-image. You preach tolerance and the right for people to make their own decisions on one hand, then engage in hypocritical condemnation on the other when you run into someone who operates from a different paradigm. I tolerate plenty of divergent thought. A quick perusal of my forum posts should make that clear. What I don't tolerate is the perpetuation of your male supremacy drivel. You actually think that seducing those who are emotionally weaker than you so you can manipulate them for your own use is being “dominant?” I call it being a bully. You're a hypocrite. Women have been seducing men for millenia and I have not once spotted any condemnation from you in regard to financial Dommes or others who take advantage of weak male subs. No, in your hypocritical one-sided world-view, as long as women take advantage of men, it's all good. If men take advantage of weak women, it's the crime of the century. How about you wake up and smell what you're shoveling. Ahh, so now we have (once again) moved from me, personally to women. Watch it sweetie, your misogyny is slipping. BTW: I routinely bait the scammers when they intro their “ads.” I believe I am known for it. Unfortunately, few take the bait, thus not allowing me to have the great entertainment value of this particular conversation. But I digress. I need to ask for clarity, did you just admit to taking advantage of emotionally weaker females in the name of “dominance?” The fact that you have to descend into personal attacks tells me these little chit chats we’ve been having disconcert you. I look forward to watching you further implode in future. Personal attacks? Oh, you mean like when you said "Whenever you post this nonsense, I always have to check your profile for your age. How you can still believe this crap at 43 is beyond me." - Those kinds of personal attacks? Yes, those kind. And *my* personal attack was much more subtle that your personal attack. B/c it wasn't framed as an attack, but an observation. I do have to look at your profile and check your age, b/c I can’t believe that someone with your intelligence is this immature in their thinking. It speaks of the type of profoundly myopic viewpoint that comes from past emotional trauma. I assume some female hurt you badly in the past. What's that? I think you just tripped over your own hypocrisy again. Hoist by your own petard, as it were. Christ, you're easy. Next time, come to the conversation with your A game - although frankly, I really don't think you're up to this. You've been spending too much time around male subs. Hoisted by my own petard, how droll!! You do know the meaning of this phrase, right? It means blown up by your own bomb, in other words, it went off too early !! Premature ejaculation, anyone?
< Message edited by ChatteParfaitt -- 8/11/2011 4:25:16 AM >
_____________________________
|