LadyConstanze
Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze quote:
ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker IPCC report on the news at the moment - Duggan never drew a weapon, all shots (including the one in the officer's radio) were fired by the police. Carrying a gun in a sock is in no way enough of a crime to justify his killing. (Also it's entirely possible the gun may have belonged to the taxi driver, it's not uncommon in that sort of area.) We are talking about the innocent victim, the guy who has gangster poses all over the web, flash cars, lots of jewelry but coming from this poor estate and on his way home from work, only there isn't an employment record so far, the same guy who his friends call "elder" and who had a gun with him? Yes, that same guy who did not attack the police or provoke them to shoot. You don't get to execute a person just because you've decided they're a baddie. No but if he carried a gun and was a known gang leader, should the cops wait until he tries to kill them first? Would you feel better if he would have killed a cop before they shot him? Now if he didn't plan to kill anybody, why did he have a gun in his sock? I mean there are so many other things you can use guns for, I just seem to come up with no other reason than shooting at the moment. Do you think he might have had it for hunting, in the middle of London? There are also very strong laws regarding firearms in this country, if I was a cop and I would know some guy carries a gun, I would shoot if he'd make the wrong movement. What do you think are the chances that his firearm was an illegal one and why do you think he carried one with him? I agree they should not have shot him, but I would be a bit interested in seeing the whole story, why they were following him, his police record, because it seems they had been watching him for quite a while. It's not like the Met police is driving round trying to execute people like in a bad movie, I'm pretty sure that the guys would rather have made a quick arrest. We could now start with theories that they shot him because they were involved in the crimes and worried about him talking, but we possibly both agree that it's BS. What gets me is, that this guy was a known criminal, he was most likely a danger to the police, still no reason to just shoot, but how strange that he seems to be painted now as this upstanding member of the community who the evil police shot when he was nothing but a hard working boy... I think there is a lot of dirt on both sides but everybody just seems to point at the police.
_____________________________
There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary Those who do and those who don't! http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html
|