|
Anaxagoras -> RE: There was a plane! (8/17/2011 7:21:25 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961
1) It takes months to set up a controlled demolition of a building. And it takes a large crew to set the explosive charges on supporting structures to bring the building down, NOT TO MENTION THAT THE DRY WALL AND CONCRETE WOULD HAVE TO BE REMOVED FROM THOSE STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS IN ORDER TO PLACE THE FUCKING CHARGES.
I am sure that some of the THOUSANDS of people working in the twin towers AND WTC 7 would have noticed this and said something about it.
Termy believes the buildings were built with the demolition charges integrated whilst Rule believes an explosive the side of his fingernail brought down Tower 7, which led me to speculate if Rule's fingernail is grotesquely oversized! [:D]
quote:
2) NONE OF THE BUILDINGS COLLAPSED IN THEIR OWN FOOTPRINT.
If they had none of the other buildings that were destroyed by the collapsing buildings would have been damaged. IN OTHER WORDS YOU IDIOTS, THE MARRIOTT HOTEL AND THE ST. NICHOLAS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH WOULD HAVE BEEN LEFT UNTOUCHED.
Conspiracists describe all the buildings as textbook controlled demolitions. None of the Towers imploded into their own footprints. Allt he other WTC towers were destroyed. Not to mention Tower 7 caused serious damage to the Deutsche Bank Building, the Verizon Building, and World Financial Center and others. The cost of repair was immense. The substantial damage to the Verizon building alone cost 1.4 billion alone to repair http://newyork.construction.com/projects/TopProjects04/Verizon.asp
quote:
3) Super thermite, the substance that was supposedly painted on various supporting steel structures was in very LIMITED supply in 2001, and the amount needed for the destruction of BOTH towers did not exist. In 2002, the production of nano-sized aluminum particles required for super thermite required considerable effort, and commercial sources for the material was limited.
It is only been in recent years that the production of super thermite has exceeded 100kg/month.
Again to "paint" this substance on the various supporting steel structures would require the removal of drywall and concrete, which would have been noticed, and once more, someone among the thousands working in the towers would have asked questions or talked to someone who would have made a big deal of it.
IN OTHER WORDS MORONS, THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL THAT THE OPERATION TO PLACE EXPLOSIVE CHARGES FOR A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OR THE PAINTING OF SUPER THERMITE ON THESE STRUCTURES WOULD HAVE GONE UNNOTICED.
I am sure that if explosives and detonator cables were noticed, people would have gotten a wee bit worried and gotten the hell out of the building refusing to return.
The Thermite claims are also absurd because if Thermite was used, the further application of explosives which they also claim were used, would not only become redundant but counter-productive to any supposed effort to perform a fake 9/11: http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm while the brief molten flow seen was likely aluminium and oxides incl glass.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rule
quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961
2) NONE OF THE BUILDINGS COLLAPSED IN THEIR OWN FOOTPRINT.
If they had none of the other buildings that were destroyed by the collapsing buildings would have been damaged. IN OTHER WORDS YOU IDIOTS, THE MARRIOTT HOTEL AND THE ST. NICHOLAS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH WOULD HAVE BEEN LEFT UNTOUCHED.
Semantics. [8|]
Let's be realistic: Any demolition expert would have been extremely content to have brought down 1, 2 and 7 on a single day as nicely as they did collapse. I admire the beauty of this precision engineering. The aesthetically pleasing way those buildings collapsed was pure beauty.
So I expect the gubermint team tasked with the immense organisation of a faked 9/11 event couldn't afford more than one demolition expert? I credited Rule with a lively imagination but he can't even make it convincing within its own loony logic. [sm=biggrin.gif]
|
|
|
|
