blacksword404
Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
If they get paid, then why is it often called the unfinanced mandate?
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)[1] is a U.S. Act of Congress passed in 1986 as part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). It requires hospitals and ambulance services to provide care to anyone needing emergency healthcare treatment regardless of citizenship, legal status or ability to pay. There are no reimbursement provisions. As a result of the act, patients needing emergency treatment can be discharged only under their own informed consent or when their condition requires transfer to a hospital better equipped to administer the treatment. EMTALA applies to "participating hospitals", i.e., those that accept payment from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Medicare program. However, in practical terms, EMTALA applies to virtually all hospitals in the U.S., with the exception of the Shriners Hospitals for Children, Indian Health Service hospitals, and Veterans Affairs hospitals[citation needed]. The combined payments of Medicare and Medicaid, $602 billion in 2004,[2] or roughly 44% of all medical expenditures in the U.S., make not participating in EMTALA impractical for nearly all hospitals. EMTALA's provisions apply to all patients, and not just to Medicare patients.[3][4] The cost of emergency care required by EMTALA is not directly covered by the federal government. Because of this, the law has been criticized by some as an unfunded mandate.[5] Similarly, it has attracted controversy for its impacts on hospitals, and in particular, for its possible contributions to an emergency medical system that is "overburdened, underfunded and highly fragmented."[6] More than half of all emergency room care in the U.S. now goes uncompensated[citation needed]. Hospitals write off such care as charity or bad debt for tax purposes. Increasing financial pressures on hospitals in the period since EMTALA's passage have caused consolidations and closures, so the number of emergency rooms is decreasing despite increasing demand for emergency care.[7] There is also debate about the extent to which EMTALA has led to cost-shifting and higher rates for insured or paying hospital patients, thereby contributing to the high overall rate of medical inflation in the U.S.
quote:
They get paid. It might be a question of who does the paying. But let's say you are forced to work without being paid. Do you think obamacare is going to solve that issue? That sounds like slavery to me.
Unless you are referring to the employees getting paid. Another federal requirement they cannot get out of. That wasnt what I was referring too.
I guess it is a form of slavery. At least for the hospitals. I would have long ago stopped working if I only got paid for half of my work. I still think obamacare is an overboard way of fixing that problem.
_____________________________
Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.
Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum
Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.
The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH
|
RE: Appeals court rules against Obama healthcare law - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread