Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Deregulation is the answer?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Deregulation is the answer? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 9:53:48 AM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
It's been a Republican mantra that deregulating the economy helps grow businesses. Some business groups spout the same mantra. But if we take a look at the industries where we all pay a big piece of our paycheck, I'd say that deregulation has lead to lousy service and higher prices. It's not surprising that corporate profits are up- the money we should be spending on new products and services is instead being spent on existing services-with higher prices. Let's look at a few...

Telecommunications: Back in the 90s, telco firms were showing charts that as a percentage of GDP, their share was going up. As consumers, we've seen staggeringly priced "plans" where we're spending in excess of $1k/yr on access to networks where the technology was largely developed with taxpayer dollars. But what's worse is that this industry uses "contracts" to enforce payment- contracts which are akin to something that the mob would understand, rather than any reasonable business agreement. These companies have provided shoddy service, lied about coverage, pricing, and cell phone battery lives, and we have few alternatives due to the barriers of entry into this business. If there were real competition in this industry, prices would be a fraction of what they are today, and we'd have better service. Deregulation has helped here?

Insurance: The largest industry on the planet, insurance firms have never been of sterling character since they get paid before they deliver services. And their viewpoint is that services constitute "losses". So we have astronomical health care costs where the insurance companies often deny coverage- to the point where more expensive treatments are needed, homes that we think are protected from disaster aren't- witness how many people lost everything in Katrina, and even what should be simple things like auto accidents aren't paid for. (Personal example- my brother's parked car was hit and a door folded forward- the insurance company of the driver who hit the car refused to pay.)

Hospitals: Why does an operation to replace a hip in the US cost 3x what it does in Europe? Can't argue that the care is significantly better? Anybody see a relation with outsize hospital profits?

Banks: Banks have been raising fees on ATMs which were supposed to reduce their costs to the point where some of us are just carrying more cash, rather than relying on what have become usurious charges to get our damn money....And do we need to look at the bailouts and the mortgage meltdown? Look at the states that had strong regulations on mortgages such as New York- which learned that after the first depression, no exotic financial instruments which allowed banks to become landlords- to states like Florida, Nevada, Arizona, and California which didn't. We pay way too much interest on credit cards as well-money that should go to other purposes. Given current technology- checks should beat credit cards. Why don't we have electronic checks instead? Debit cards don't count- I don't see why Visa or Mastercard deserves a couple of percent per transaction.

One of the purposes of regulations in an economy is to keep the playing field level. By allowing large corporations a free hand to swindle their customers with the mantra of deregulation, it's another reason why our economy isn't growing. The money we should have for new goods and services is being swallowed up to bolster corporate profits on existing goods and services.

Sam
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 9:56:15 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
deregulaton leads to monopoly and removes competition.

If there was a level playing field and there was a free market to begin with, different story.

I can see getting shed of some specious regulations, but not a wholesale drop off the dock.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 8/16/2011 10:03:26 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 11:21:06 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
3 of your target industries are among the MOST regulated, and have not been materially deregulated. Nuff said.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 12:47:15 PM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
Can't speak for telecommunications, or banks...
But insurance companies are just like any other company, they're out to make as much profit as possible for their share holders, and that's why my state made it illegal for them to drop you when you need the coverage the most.

Hospitals operate on very slim margins, and due to many uninsured people using them for basic care, they are constantly taking a hit with people who can't pay, therefore they charge those that can, much more to stay in business.

< Message edited by subrob1967 -- 8/16/2011 12:48:01 PM >


_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 1:17:22 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Hospitals operate on very slim margins, and due to many uninsured people using them for basic care, they are constantly taking a hit with people who can't pay, therefore they charge those that can, much more to stay in business.


I'm trying to remember how our dear Rick Scott here got wealthy.  Oh that's right, hospitals on those "slim profit" margins.

You do understand that the hospitals get money and grants from different government agencies to pay for those people don't you?


_____________________________

Do you promise to funk, the whole funk, and nothing but the funk?

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 1:22:42 PM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
I dunno. I sure as hell pay a lot less for a phone than I used to back in the day.

There's all different kinds of insurance. Auto and home seem pretty cheap to me, but I'll agree on the medical stuff. I think part of the bigger problem is how to address the money because we're talking a shitload of US jobs. I read a report somewhere that the healthcare and related industries constitute over a quarter of all jobs in the US. I don't know if that's true or not, but either way, it's a lot of people. Built into those healthcare costs are more items than simply people who can't pay, but a lot of good paying jobs. If the percentage above is true, one in four Americans rely somewhat on that income. Fucking with it looks to me like knocking the bottom out of the house of cards that is our economy. So while we bitch a lot, we've roped ourselves into a corner where we depend on it too.

I'll get on your boat with banks and credit card companies. Though I think a lot of it is tied to an investment return mentality that existed prior to the housing bust. To put that simply, no one wants less money, not even Uncle Fred when he looks at his 401k.




_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 1:22:49 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well, part of the slim margin can be attributed to the massive lobbying they do, and the bonuses they pay. Affects the bottom line of that shareholders nickle.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 1:35:33 PM   
MileHighM


Posts: 400
Joined: 10/8/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

It's been a Republican mantra that deregulating the economy helps grow businesses. Some business groups spout the same mantra. But if we take a look at the industries where we all pay a big piece of our paycheck, I'd say that deregulation has lead to lousy service and higher prices. It's not surprising that corporate profits are up- the money we should be spending on new products and services is instead being spent on existing services-with higher prices. Let's look at a few...

Telecommunications: Back in the 90s, telco firms were showing charts that as a percentage of GDP, their share was going up. As consumers, we've seen staggeringly priced "plans" where we're spending in excess of $1k/yr on access to networks where the technology was largely developed with taxpayer dollars. But what's worse is that this industry uses "contracts" to enforce payment- contracts which are akin to something that the mob would understand, rather than any reasonable business agreement. These companies have provided shoddy service, lied about coverage, pricing, and cell phone battery lives, and we have few alternatives due to the barriers of entry into this business. If there were real competition in this industry, prices would be a fraction of what they are today, and we'd have better service. Deregulation has helped here?


This is a case where deregulation has actually helped---Yes they suck, but they sucked worse before. When telecom was even more regulated, AT&T held a monopoly and was screwing people. They broke it up and started to deregulate. Notice how you actually have a choice in plans and providers and the service actually comes at differents costs. Not the case with other utilities, you pay what you pay.



Insurance: The largest industry on the planet, insurance firms have never been of sterling character since they get paid before they deliver services. And their viewpoint is that services constitute "losses". So we have astronomical health care costs where the insurance companies often deny coverage- to the point where more expensive treatments are needed, homes that we think are protected from disaster aren't- witness how many people lost everything in Katrina, and even what should be simple things like auto accidents aren't paid for. (Personal example- my brother's parked car was hit and a door folded forward- the insurance company of the driver who hit the car refused to pay.)


Agreed, they need to be more responsive to the consumer, and the government could require better capitalization. On the other hand, when you play with fire you get burned. Living FL (or LA) should require you to get a special hurricane only policy. The reason most people don't have em is they are bloody expensive. However, there is a really good reason for it, hurricanes destroy a lot of shit, and someone, like me in CO, doesn't want to pay for some ass living in a wood home in a hurricane zone. We have the same griping every time there is a forrest fire in the mountains. Some people have the fire insurance, others don't, it is your risk.


Hospitals: Why does an operation to replace a hip in the US cost 3x what it does in Europe? Can't argue that the care is significantly better? Anybody see a relation with outsize hospital profits?


I have one word for you: Lawyers. It isn't really just the cost of lawsuits either. Most of those costs are related to the worry about getting sued. Too many tests, forms, and hoops to jump through to indemnify the docs. Also, they have to have massive legal resources on retainer or on staff or whatever, just to be safe. Docs here are paranoid and overworked and they don't even make that much money anymore.


Banks: Banks have been raising fees on ATMs which were supposed to reduce their costs to the point where some of us are just carrying more cash, rather than relying on what have become usurious charges to get our damn money....And do we need to look at the bailouts and the mortgage meltdown? Look at the states that had strong regulations on mortgages such as New York- which learned that after the first depression, no exotic financial instruments which allowed banks to become landlords- to states like Florida, Nevada, Arizona, and California which didn't. We pay way too much interest on credit cards as well-money that should go to other purposes. Given current technology- checks should beat credit cards. Why don't we have electronic checks instead? Debit cards don't count- I don't see why Visa or Mastercard deserves a couple of percent per transaction.


Yup, these fuckers need a sharp stick in the ass. But before you go off blaming this all one party or another, looking into what the financial community gives to both parties. Both sides are the whore puppets to the Wall Street masters. That consumer protection act the Dems passed recently, what a joke (credit cards are even nastier now than the were before). Why not bring back Glass-Steagall? It's repeall utimately led to the recent bank/mortgage meltdown. That was repealled in a bipartisan manner in congress and signed off by Clinton.



One of the purposes of regulations in an economy is to keep the playing field level. By allowing large corporations a free hand to swindle their customers with the mantra of deregulation, it's another reason why our economy isn't growing. The money we should have for new goods and services is being swallowed up to bolster corporate profits on existing goods and services.

Sam


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 2:00:54 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

IThere's all different kinds of insurance. Auto and home seem pretty cheap to me, but I'll agree on the medical stuff.



Thats because the vast majority of the health insurance premium is for things that shouldnt be insured in the first place, and why "donut hole" policies will replace most of the traditional policies if Obamacare finally gets repealed.


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 2:04:41 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

This is a case where deregulation has actually helped---Yes they suck, but they sucked worse before. When telecom was even more regulated, AT&T held a monopoly and was screwing people. They broke it up and started to deregulate. Notice how you actually have a choice in plans and providers and the service actually comes at differents costs. Not the case with other utilities, you pay what you pay.


?? It was REGULATION that broke up ATT, and in fact did nothing but INCREASE costs. The increased competition was the natural result of development of cellular technology that has much cheaper infrastructure requirements than land lines, and would have happened without the breakup. The RBOCs had to increase their rates beyond ATT rates because of redundant administration and advertising costs and the cost of compliance.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 2:10:26 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
no, that is as wrong as any insurance peddler could make it. Long before cellular was the carter phone.

And about that other increased costs lie? you should read up on collocation. I was in that fight wilbur, both feet and bigtime.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 2:11:30 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
ST

We've got to do something about health care costs- they've been on an unsustainable trajectory for years. Yes, health care jobs are often decent, and can't be exported, but I don't think they make up a quarter of the work force.

In terms of telco- I remember when a landline could be had for $15/month. Most people are paying a hell of a lot more for cell service these days. Breaking up AT+T was a good idea- the problem was that the AT+T executives have created an oligopoly instead- there really isn't much choice or competition in this industry.

Banking costs are a parasitic drag on an economy. Expensive banking means that there's less money to invest in new technologies, products and services. Any good idea in banking has been tried and used for centuries- exotic stuff in that industry should be a warning sign. Banking needs to be a boring industry. MHM- I was furious about the repeal of Glass-Steagal- because it was easy to predict the coming meltdown. I tend to put this one on the Republicans though, although Clinton did sign off on it. Again- one of the poster children for "bipartisanship". My grumble is that when things go to hell, "bipartisanship" is used to spread the blame, but when things work out- then it's one party's idea or another.

In some cases, regulation has worked out very well. The food industry historically was a horror show until the Pure Food and Drug Act. Allowing politicians to claim that ingredients such as high fructose corn syrup need to be subsidized has been a problem though, as well as Reagan's asinine comment that "ketchup is a vegetable". Overall though, food is far safer and healthier than a century ago- and it's a lot cheaper as well. This in a heavily regulated industry.

Pharmaceuticals up until the past decade or so has been another example of a heavily regulated industry that's worked very well- lots of money poured into R+D, innovative new products, and a good safety record overall. The regulations do need some tweaking these days since the industry has become a dinosaur- but it's been a long successful run.

Lawyers- used to not be able to advertise. (nor could pharma.) Seems to me that allowing lawyers to advertise has been a disaster- and that the licensing process is a sick joke. A lot more lawyers should be losing their licenses....

The auto industry still has a knee jerk reaction against regulation- but the reality is that their customers like the end products. Clean air, safety belts, airbags, better bumpers- all a function of regulation.

However, insurance costs killed the general aviation industry- which used to be a hotbed of innovation as well, even though heavily regulated. Instead, you have to build your own airplane....


Seems to me that intelligent regulation helps builds industries- and blindly deregulating leads to calamities. Tort reform would do a lot to improve many facets of the economy. It used to be a Republican strong suit......


Sam

(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 2:42:15 PM   
MileHighM


Posts: 400
Joined: 10/8/2009
Status: offline
Um I can get a crappy landline for 14$ a month (local calls only, but thats the way it was back in the day too.). Not too bad for inflation. I don't care about landlines in telecom, they are the dinosaurs of the past. Wireless and Voip is what I am talking about. We couldn't afford wireless if it wasn't for some dereg. Before, it was heavily taxed as a luxury item. Now it is the standard of communication because of dereg that allowed broader access to the technology.

I agree the R's had more to do with the repeal. But, dems came out in overwhelming favor in congress too. On 80 some voted against the repeal. It comes down to money contributions. Politicians are whores that can be bought. Wall street doesn't care if there is an R or a D next to your name, they know you have a price, and they will pay it.

Not always the case in the auto industry. When it comes to safety, lawsuits have been way out ahead of the gov't in forcing better safety regs. Most industry safety guidlines are ahead of the governments (stability control for example was standard in many vehicles ahead of gov't regs same with side airbags etc)

The key to everything you said is intelligent regulation----I don't like wild west economics, but I don't like big brother either. Tort reform is nothing more than regulating the lawyers, it only seems fair.

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 2:46:44 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Look at power companies, water, sewage, gas... where are the choices?  There are none.  You are stuck with whomever is in the area.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 4:51:43 PM   
outhere69


Posts: 1302
Joined: 1/25/2011
Status: offline
Well, you can ask Californians what happened after the electric utilities deregulated. Glad I'd moved out by then. Another side effect of utility deregulation is that everyone likes to own the power generation systems, but no one wants to pay for upkeep or improvements in the transmission systems.

Often monopolies are broken up in the name of competition, only to have the pieces consolidate into an oligopoly. Where's the competition there? Remember airline dereg? The service is absolutely fucking abysmal. They add on endless fees for the simplest stuff. They went to "hub and spoke" and that's not a good thing anymore. They outsource maintenance to unskilled firms or even overseas. The margins are so thin that they'd rather fly a shitload of regional jets instead of a standard sized one, which has led to major overloading of the ATC system and contributes to a large number of ground delays (I shit you not, I flew out of Dulles one night and there were no less than 12 commuter flights scheduled to take off within 10 minutes of each other. Do you really think that happened? Nothing was done about stunts like that until the FAA finally knocked some heads together, most memorably at ORD.) Oh yeah, those regional jets are flown by cheap semi-independent subsidiaries.

Maybe they should stop trying to compete with Greyhound. If they're flying all this new volume due to cheap prices, but lose money on it while screwing the passengers on fees and handing out crap service, where the hell's the advantage? I won't fly anywhere that I can drive in 8 hours or less, and that includes business travel.

Companies are told they can regulate themselves, and lo and behold, they do a shitty job. Probably because many CEOs have incentives to get the stock price up, leading to a lot of short term instead of long term thinking. If fines are cheap relative to income, well, why not violate and figure that there's a small chance of being discovered due to the lack of enforcement.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 5:26:41 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: outhere69

Well, you can ask Californians what happened after the electric utilities deregulated.


There was only partial deregulation, and it was poorly designed. Prices they could charge were capped, but the cost of generation/purchase wasnt. Deregulation didnt cause the problems, bad regulations did.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to outhere69)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 5:41:22 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
MHM

I wouldn't be surprised if the landline costs the phone company more than a cell number. Why do texts cost more than voice when they use fewer bits? The pricing is basically what the consumer will bear- and again, it's an oligopoly.

In terms of auto- function of both lawsuit and regulation, but catalytic converters, seat belts, and better bumpers are due to regulation.

Tazzy

I suspect we're going to be hit with higher rates for electricity, even with deregulation, but it may allow other industries to spring up. Centralized power production is something of a dinosaur in suburban environments- only makes sense for urban. Why should Montana need GW of coal plant power production? Instead, allowing people to come up with power generation that utilizes the local environment makes more sense. Besides, once utilities have to buy power from individual sources, some folks will make money on power production, especially with co-generation facilities. If we're creating jobs- I can stand a hit in my electric bill. Besides, there will probably be savings in military if we start using less oil.

Biofuels may have just gotten a boost- somebody isolated an enzyme from a bacteria thats good at chopping up lignin- which makes getting sugars out of a variety of biomass a lot easier.

OT- I think the airlines problems are a function of bad regulation. It's always been an industry which has needed a lot of federal input- it didn't take off till airports were built in the 30s as part of WPA. The problem with airlines is that if you want service to large areas of the country with a small population, i.e. like mail service, well, then you need to subsidize the costs with more profitable routes. Of course, most international airlines also have had subsidies. No easy answers here...


Sam

(in reply to outhere69)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 7:00:39 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Sam, don't take my lack of participation here as a sign of disagreement. Every damn time they say someting is good for us it is not. It extends to everything but what people don't understand is that we can regulate it ourselves.

Stop buying. This may mean life itself when it comes to healthcare for example, but you either got the fucking balls or you don't. They never found out what was wrong with me. If I get sick again why go back ? And then why should I buy that MANDATED insurance. Fuck, I won't even get insurance on a car. Not that I can but if I could I would not. The one time I went to a doctor for sickness was when I was trying to get out of a court date. All part of that game. I was SICK AS A MF, and people threatened to drag me in. I stopped them. You might remember because I did say it.

When their precious phone service becomes too expensive guess what, I will not have one. Same with electric and everything. I will die. Fuck them, someone has to start. What's more I got more plans which I will not reveal. Deregulated ? Good, then I am deregulated as well. Let's play. Delusions of grandeur ? Ummmm, does anyone remember that I know alot of things about technology and the infrastructure ?

You know one time, and I SWEAR this was not on purpose, I blew out the cable TV system in an entire city ? This is old shit and I got witnesses, and the statute of limitations is up. Just think what might have happened if I were up to no good eh ?

(I inadvertently got past the power block which powered alot of the amps, and with ALOT of voltage, sorry, really I did not mean it, details on request)

I used to have a 100 pound tank of propane on the yard. Can you imagine what I could do with that when it comes to the sewer system ?

Yes, deregulate, by all means. Get more people on my side, more people fed up. I will train them.

T^T


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 7:55:19 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
Great thread sam, way to much for me to comment on right now but basically corporate size should be capped, conglomerates and all trusts worldwide should be abolished because they can hide shit and we cant. Starting with the gubafia.  Anything too big beyond that should be part of the gubmint, as a service not citizen contract, the banks should be completely elimiated and run under the treasury, they use our property to fund the secure the money and we get no benefit from it what so ever.   The banks are the root of all evil and should be abolished, corps should have charters with sunset clauses voted on by the community.
The gubafia agencies are what ruined medical in the first place and turned it from a practice to a business.  Might sound outlandish without going into detail but most of these are literally criminal maggots and the only way to cure it is ti cut it off.

Look at burzynski with his cancer cure (antineoplastons) since 197x.

http://vimeo.com/24821365

They indicted him 5 times, and lost, it even got the attention from congress who had a hearing on WTF do they think they are doing, then they throw him in jail while they file and steal his patents.

We may as well face it we are officially on a fast track to a banana republic.






_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Deregulation is the answer? - 8/16/2011 9:29:37 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Great thread sam, way to much for me to comment on right now but basically corporate size should be capped, conglomerates and all trusts worldwide should be abolished because they can hide shit and we cant. Starting with the gubafia.  Anything too big beyond that should be part of the gubmint, as a service not citizen contract, the banks should be completely elimiated and run under the treasury, they use our property to fund the secure the money and we get no benefit from it what so ever.   The banks are the root of all evil and should be abolished, corps should have charters with sunset clauses voted on by the community.
The gubafia agencies are what ruined medical in the first place and turned it from a practice to a business.  Might sound outlandish without going into detail but most of these are literally criminal maggots and the only way to cure it is ti cut it off.

Look at burzynski with his cancer cure (antineoplastons) since 197x.

http://vimeo.com/24821365

They indicted him 5 times, and lost, it even got the attention from congress who had a hearing on WTF do they think they are doing, then they throw him in jail while they file and steal his patents.

We may as well face it we are officially on a fast track to a banana republic.








Just more proof that you cant distinguish scams from reality. antineoplastins, roflmao.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Deregulation is the answer? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109