Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Playing loose with facts AGAIN???


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 3:57:06 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Michele Bachmann’s too-good-to-be-true stat on federal workers

“Well, I think the one thing we have to do is reject the new normal level of spending under the Obama administration, because President Obama amped up spending to never-seen-before levels. . . . I mean, one example I'll give you is, we had one employee at the federal Department of Transportation that made $170,000 a year at the beginning of the recession. We had the trillion-dollar stimulus, and 18 months into the recession, we had 1,690 employees making over $170,000. Government has really been growing at — a lot of largesse, but the people in the real world aren’t. And that’s what has to change. Government has no conformity at all with the real world.”

— Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Aug. 14, 2011
By Glenn Kessler

(JIM YOUNG/REUTERS)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/michele-bachmanns-too-good-to-be-true-stat-on-federal-workers/2011/08/15/gIQAZaqbHJ_blog.html
BUT

The Facts
Note that although the GOP presidential aspirant starts out by talking about the “never-seen-before levels” of spending under Obama and then mentions “the trillion-dollar stimulus,” the example she cites — the number of Transportation Department employees making more than $170,000 — uses the metric of “the beginning of the recession.” There’s a reason for that phrase: The recession started in December 2007, 13 months before Obama became president.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 5:06:34 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
Apparently her version of Christianity is OK with liars.

_____________________________

Do you promise to funk, the whole funk, and nothing but the funk?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 5:12:33 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
she didnt lie... technically.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 5:19:53 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
Sorry, I wouldn't accept that excuse from one of the kids.

She knows she played with the facts to create a false idea. 

I guess the commandment about not bearing false witness doesn't apply in her version of Christianity.


_____________________________

Do you promise to funk, the whole funk, and nothing but the funk?

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 5:26:07 PM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline
The ignorant and the uninformed are easily led astray.  I think that is what Michelle is counting on.

_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 5:27:02 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Bearing False Witness is only among other Dominionist Christians. She can lie to the infidels all she wants and it's ok in her mind....

Remember, the Tea Party isn't a political movement, it's a RELIGION.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 5:32:56 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
so its a christian thing too?

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 6:09:06 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009
I guess the commandment about not bearing false witness doesn't apply in her version of Christianity.



She was under oath?


I thought that the point of her statement was the 1 versus 1,690 employees making 170k+.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 6:49:45 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Can that really be true ? Someone,smarter than me,should take a hard look at those numbers.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 7:08:17 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
it explains it all in the link.
Bachman giving obama powers before he actually attained them

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 9:00:22 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009
I guess the commandment about not bearing false witness doesn't apply in her version of Christianity.



She was under oath?


I thought that the point of her statement was the 1 versus 1,690 employees making 170k+.


It was... check when that occurred. 

Bachmann wrongly blamed President Obama for increasing the number of federal transportation workers who earn more than $170,000 from one to 1,690 during the recession. At least two-thirds of those employees were receiving more than $170,000 before Obama took office.

.......

According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the recession began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009. As of September 2007, three months before the recession started, only one DOT employee — the Secretary of Transportation — made more than $170,000, according to an online database maintained by the Office of Personnel Management. By June 2009, when the bureau declared the recession had ended, there were 1,690 employees in the Department of Transportation making more than $170,000 a year.

So, Bachmann's figures check out. But is this an example of Obama failing to cut spending? Hardly. OPM's database also shows that 1,122 of the 1,690 DOT employees cited by Bachmann were earning more than $170,000 in pay as of September 2008 — nine months into the recession — while President George W. Bush was still in office. OPM's next data set isn't until March 2009 and, by that time, Obama had been in office for less than three months. By March 2009, the DOT was paying 1,686 of its employees more than $170,000. That's nearly all of the 1,690 DOT employees she cites as earning more than $170,000 by the end of the recession.

OPM's online database provides annual salary figures up until 2008 and quarterly figures beginning in March 2009, so we were unable to determine precisely how many of the 1,690 DOT workers saw their pay top $170,000 under Bush and how many did so under Obama. OPM and DOT declined to provide more information. But this much is clear: At least two-thirds of the DOT employees who broke the $170,000 pay barrier did so under Bush. It's probably higher than that, though, because Bush in 2008 signed into law a bill that gave federal workers a 3.9 percent across-the-board pay increase, effective Jan. 1, 2009. (Obama took office on Jan. 20, 2009.) That pay increase would have been reflected in the March 2009 data. We are not looking to blame Bush for rising federal pay. In fact, the Republican president in 2008 sought a 2.9 percent raise for civilian federal workers and 3.4 percent pay hike for military workers, but the Democratic-controlled Congress succeeded in getting a larger pay increase, a 3.9 percent across-the-board pay hike, signed into law. Our interest here is purely whether Obama can be blamed for the spike in DOT employees earning more than $170,0000 during the recession.

Since becoming president, Obama has taken steps to slow federal pay. He recommended a 2 percent pay increase for the fiscal year 2010. Under normal circumstances, the increase would be 2.4 percent based on the Employment Cost Index, which measures salaries of non-federal workers. However, citing "serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare," Obama implemented the "alternative pay plan."

In November 2010, Obama proposed a two-year civilian federal pay freeze for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. This is reflected in the General Schedule Salary Table for 2011, which froze rates at the 2010 levels.

http://www.factcheck.org/2011/06/bachmanns-waterloo/

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 8/17/2011 9:01:26 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 10:09:02 PM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
let's see here...
1. she's a politician.
2. she spun a fact to make the other side look bad.

and?

christ on a cupcake people, what the fuck did you expect?




_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 10:21:59 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

what the fuck did you expect?


Your reaction

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/17/2011 10:28:06 PM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline




_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/18/2011 8:49:18 AM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

let's see here...
1. she's a politician.
2. she spun a fact to make the other side look bad.

and?

christ on a cupcake people, what the fuck did you expect?


The truth, especially from someone who is waving their Christian values and morals as a battle flag.

If you don't demand better you will never get it.


_____________________________

Do you promise to funk, the whole funk, and nothing but the funk?

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/18/2011 9:10:40 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

The ignorant and the uninformed are easily led astray.  I think that is what Michelle is counting on.

There are no more ignorant and uninformed who have been and continue to be led astray than Obama minions. Rep Maxine Waters recently proved that.

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/18/2011 9:13:58 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
OH, look, someone who hasnt ever got facts, and goes out of his way to avoid them is telling us how it ought to be. Rushfelching at its finest.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/18/2011 9:32:37 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

let's see here...
1. she's a politician.
2. she spun a fact to make the other side look bad.

and?

christ on a cupcake people, what the fuck did you expect?




1,She is a politician who is running for the position of being the leader of the "free world"
2, Nobody cares about the politics of Canada or the UK(unless you happen to be from there, or there are riots there)
3,She has so many lies in her "truth" and I am doing my part to bring facts to the arrogant and ignorant(and learn something along the way myself)
4, Im almost fifty and Im unable to find a bar that likes to ROCK the way I do.
5, I get sadistic pleasure from the backpedalling and whinging from her supporters


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/18/2011 9:42:43 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
quote:

5, I get sadistic pleasure from the backpedalling and whinging from her supporters
ah, it's all good then. enjoy.

_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? - 8/18/2011 9:43:58 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
winks

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Playing loose with facts AGAIN??? Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094