Iamsemisweet
Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011 From: The Great Northwest, USA Status: offline
|
Yes. Was. Not because the law was followed, but because of some budget rider that is being challenged. There is your reason. Here, this explains it. Again. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/04/wolves-northern-rockies-budget-rider-montana-idaho.html quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity It was a federally protected species "WAS" For a reason, semisweety quote:
ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet This is state sanctioned, not federal, sanity. You can't make this about Obama, except that he did not veto the entire budget bill with this rider. So, I guess if you call that authorizing . . . . quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity But the administration holds the veto pen and the administration controls the Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Theyre allowing the hunts because there is no other choice quote:
ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet First of all, I grew up in Montana and live in Washington state. I am not thousands of miles away. Second, the so called delisting occurred in a budget rider. If the species has recovered , fine, delist it. But do it under the ESA, using biological data, not political game playing.
< Message edited by Iamsemisweet -- 8/26/2011 7:47:44 AM >
_____________________________
Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people. The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad. Alice: How do you know I'm mad? The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.
|