RE: No, that doesn't work for us.

RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 10:49:45 AM)
the oompa loompa strikes again cackling wildly

Sanity -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 10:50:51 AM)
Hmmm More class warfare rhetoric, or football... quote: ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk Watch it , don't watch it. Doubt he gives a fuck. In the morning still be the same result...policy

Sanity -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 10:52:10 AM)
You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, lucy quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic the oompa loompa strikes again cackling wildly

Lucylastic -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 10:55:03 AM)
aww did I upset your orange crush honey?

FirmhandKY -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 10:58:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic aww did I upset your orange crush honey? I'm reserving the honeymoon suite in Vegas just for you two. [8D] Firm

popeye1250 -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 10:59:33 AM)
A jobs speech? Surely the first thing Oblunder will address is getting us out of any and all "free-trade" deals him having a "162 i.q".,.....right? Or is this going to be a cheer leading speech for spending even more money that we don't have? You can't spend your way out of poverty.

Sanity -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:00:47 AM)
God, wouldnt it be funny if we got along swell... quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic aww did I upset your orange crush honey? I'm reserving the honeymoon suite in Vegas just for you two. [8D] Firm

FirmhandKY -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:01:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 You can't spend your way out of poverty. WHAT!?? You mean all these credit cards I've been using and not paying back doesn't make me "rich"? Bastard banks! Firm

Lucylastic -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:03:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic aww did I upset your orange crush honey? I'm reserving the honeymoon suite in Vegas just for you two. [8D] Firm snickers, thats cruel and inhuman, he doesnt stand a chance!

FirmhandKY -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:03:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity God, wouldnt it be funny if we got along swell... quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic aww did I upset your orange crush honey? I'm reserving the honeymoon suite in Vegas just for you two. [8D] I anticipate that we'll all get along surprisingly well. Hell, I suspect I'll even have a drink or two or a joke or two with DomKen. Firm

willbeurdaddy -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:05:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 A jobs speech? Surely the first thing Oblunder will address is getting us out of any and all "free-trade" deals him having a "162 i.q".,.....right? Or is this going to be a cheer leading speech for spending even more money that we don't have? You can't spend your way out of poverty. Since FTAs dont cost jobs why would he want to get out of them?

Sanity -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:07:34 AM)
FR - Could be, Obama is getting ready to bow to the NFL as well quote: White House working to avoid clash with NFL's opening game In agreeing Wednesday to reschedule his planned address to a joint session of Congress, President Obama might have placated House Speaker John Boehner at the expense of the nation's football fans. Boehner, R-Ohio, balked at the president's original request to appear before Congress to discuss the nation's chronic unemployment problem on Wednesday, Sept. 7. That's the same day as a Republican presidential debate in Simi Valley, Calif. Obama agreed to move his speech to Thursday, Sept. 8, which happens to coincide with the opening game of the NFL regular season, a prime time contest between the New Orleans Saints and the defending Super Bowl champion Green Bay Packers from Lambeau Field. The game will be televised by NBC at 8:30 p.m. ET. "We’re aware of the situation and are communicating with the NFL," an NBC spokesman told ProFootballTalk.com. The Associated Press reported that White House officials were working on the precise timing of the speech in hopes of avoiding a conflict. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d821deea9/article/white-house-working-to-avoid-clash-with-nfls-opening-game?module=HP11_headline_stack

willbeurdaddy -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:13:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity FR - Could be, Obama is getting ready to bow to the NFL as well quote: White House working to avoid clash with NFL's opening game In agreeing Wednesday to reschedule his planned address to a joint session of Congress, President Obama might have placated House Speaker John Boehner at the expense of the nation's football fans. Boehner, R-Ohio, balked at the president's original request to appear before Congress to discuss the nation's chronic unemployment problem on Wednesday, Sept. 7. That's the same day as a Republican presidential debate in Simi Valley, Calif. Obama agreed to move his speech to Thursday, Sept. 8, which happens to coincide with the opening game of the NFL regular season, a prime time contest between the New Orleans Saints and the defending Super Bowl champion Green Bay Packers from Lambeau Field. The game will be televised by NBC at 8:30 p.m. ET. "We’re aware of the situation and are communicating with the NFL," an NBC spokesman told ProFootballTalk.com. The Associated Press reported that White House officials were working on the precise timing of the speech in hopes of avoiding a conflict. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d821deea9/article/white-house-working-to-avoid-clash-with-nfls-opening-game?module=HP11_headline_stack Maybe he can just provide links to his prior speeches. they all sound the same anyway.

popeye1250 -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:31:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 A jobs speech? Surely the first thing Oblunder will address is getting us out of any and all "free-trade" deals him having a "162 i.q".,.....right? Or is this going to be a cheer leading speech for spending even more money that we don't have? You can't spend your way out of poverty. Strictly speaking? *I suppose you could say that tens of millions of jobs have,.....emigrated...to those foreign countries from the U.S. Look at all those "American in name only" corporations in China. And look at that disaster called "NAFTA"; we started losing jobs to that almost immediately!* Since FTAs dont cost jobs why would he want to get out of them?

tj444 -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 11:50:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 A jobs speech? Surely the first thing Oblunder will address is getting us out of any and all "free-trade" deals him having a "162 i.q".,.....right? Or is this going to be a cheer leading speech for spending even more money that we don't have? You can't spend your way out of poverty. Strictly speaking? *I suppose you could say that tens of millions of jobs have,.....emigrated...to those foreign countries from the U.S. Look at all those "American in name only" corporations in China. And look at that disaster called "NAFTA"; we started losing jobs to that almost immediately!* Since FTAs dont cost jobs why would he want to get out of them? you dont want nafta? then you dont need Canada's oil either, go kiss the saudis ass instead

willbeurdaddy -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 12:04:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tj444 quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 A jobs speech? Surely the first thing Oblunder will address is getting us out of any and all "free-trade" deals him having a "162 i.q".,.....right? Or is this going to be a cheer leading speech for spending even more money that we don't have? You can't spend your way out of poverty. Strictly speaking? *I suppose you could say that tens of millions of jobs have,.....emigrated...to those foreign countries from the U.S. Look at all those "American in name only" corporations in China. And look at that disaster called "NAFTA"; we started losing jobs to that almost immediately!* Since FTAs dont cost jobs why would he want to get out of them? you dont want nafta? then you dont need Canada's oil either, go kiss the saudis ass instead Good thing you didnt say lick or he'd be asking you for detailed information how to get there.

TheHeretic -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 6:59:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Telling the american public they have to wait to see what happens next while they are still unemployed. Boehner delayed the speech a day, Tazzy. President Obama is the one who decided it could wait until after his vacation with the millionaires and billionaires on Martha's Vineyard... I'm sure the Speaker's office knew damn well that Thursday night was the pro football season opener, when they suggested earliest possible new date, but I'm not nearly so convinced that Obama's inner circle is still that in touch with mainstream American life. Let's not forget either, that the first spurt in this pissing contest was when the White House decided to upstage the Republican debate. Now he just gets to offer a rebuttal, and it's going to be interesting to watch how the timing is handled by NBC and the NFL.

Sanity -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 7:52:49 PM)
quote: [image]http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/aCpiYUKbfaqrfazua5J7Ew--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9aW5zZXQ7aD0zNDc7cT04NTt3PTUxMg--/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/AFP/photo_1314889527768-4-0.jpg[/image] OK, LET'S DO IT BEFORE THE GAME

erieangel -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 8:31:20 PM)
You can't be serious. Obama spent his "vacation" working on the speech and the bill. The ideas are there, but the speech isn't complete yet.

TheHeretic -> RE: No, that doesn't work for us. (9/1/2011 8:45:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: erieangel You can't be serious. Erie, there are people on this this board who've been talking to me for years, and still can't quite put their finger on that. [;)] And yes. I know the ideas are already there. They will be same ideas that have been failing since he took office.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625