Aylee
Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: Fightdirecto One of the arguments against population control is who decides which group gets told, "You cannot have children" and which group gets told, "you can have children". And zero population growth, as I understand it, says you and your partner can have a maximum of two children (your biological replacements) and no more. If you are infertile, you can adopt a biological replacement child, thus reducing the child surplus. What penalties do you give to someone who has a child, despite the fact that they belong to a group who has been told "You cannot have children" or someone who already has their two legal children/replacements? The death penalty for the mother, the father and the child? The mother and father involuntarily sterilized and the (extra) child given to a infertile, childless couple to raise and be one of their biological replacements? How about we increase the taxes on people who have more than 2? Or reduce/eliminate welfare for more than 2? Ender's Game, Orson Scott Card The big problem is that you are infringing on people's religious beliefs.
< Message edited by Aylee -- 9/2/2011 6:37:23 PM >
_____________________________
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.
|