Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Yay for spending, but not for paying for it.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 5:48:55 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline 		What the hell?

Obama just unveiled a new jobs bill.  Summing up, it says "Let's spend money again."

The Tea Partiers that damn near shut down the government a couple of months ago are mum on this one.

Hasn't anyone over there figured it out yet?  The time to worry about paying bills is when the spending occurs, not when the bills arrive.

Sheesh....


_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 5:50:35 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		I heard it will cost 300k per job. 

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 6:14:05 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Even the Dems are starting to grow a spine, balking over Obamas cheeky presidential campaign giveaway program

Therefore the Tea Party doesnt need to be nearly as loud.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

What the hell?

Obama just unveiled a new jobs bill.  Summing up, it says "Let's spend money again."

The Tea Partiers that damn near shut down the government a couple of months ago are mum on this one.

Hasn't anyone over there figured it out yet?  The time to worry about paying bills is when the spending occurs, not when the bills arrive.

Sheesh....



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:12:41 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
This, from a far left news source:

quote:


Some Democrats balking at Obama's jobs bill


President Obama anticipated Republican resistance to his jobs program, but he is now meeting increasing pushback from his own party. Many Congressional Democrats, smarting from the fallout over the 2009 stimulus bill, say there is little chance they will be able to support the bill as a single entity, citing an array of elements they cannot abide.


“I think the American people are very skeptical of big pieces of legislation,” Senator Bob Casey, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, said in an interview Wednesday, joining a growing chorus of Democrats who prefer an à la carte version of the bill despite White House resistance to that approach. “For that reason alone I think we should break it up.”


quote:




Democrats like Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, who does not want the oil industry singled out for tax changes, object to parts of the bill. The White House has opposed breaking it up.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:35:05 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Democrats like Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, who does not want the oil industry singled out for tax changes, object to parts of the bill. The White House has opposed breaking it up.


How difficult would it be to figure out who owns this bitch's mouth?

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 9/15/2011 7:36:53 AM >

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:38:49 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
You view women who arent in total agreement with your ideology as subhuman?

That seems to be a trait that many leftists have in common, for whatever reason.


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Democrats like Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, who does not want the oil industry singled out for tax changes, object to parts of the bill. The White House has opposed breaking it up.


How difficult would it be to figure out who owns this bitch's mouth?


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:43:02 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		Is there some way you could try to be less of an asshole....or is it a requirement in order to maintain your rightist decoder ring?

Said in jest in response to the insane ones generalization of "leftists"

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:46:33 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
I didnt write all leftists, you moron

But barglebargle calls them cunts

The big nosed comedian, whats-his-name calls them twats

And so on



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:47:28 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		So it isn`t the spending that`s making her hesitate.

It`s the impact on her constituency that`s making her think about it.

Only a retard would see that as anti-Obama policy.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:49:31 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Why not take us all to Disneyland?

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:50:44 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Only a retard would refuse to see that Obama policy has long involved, to paraphrase Obama,  "keeping a boot on the throat of" domestic energy production

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

So it isn`t the spending that`s making her hesitate.

It`s the impact on her constituency that`s making her think about it.

Only a retard would see that as anti-Obama policy.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:52:29 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
I am going to Disnyland

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Why not take us all to Disneyland?


BTW, you know why Micky Mouse left Minnie Mouse dontcha

Because she was fucking Goofy


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:53:01 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

What the hell?

Obama just unveiled a new jobs bill.  Summing up, it says "Let's spend money again."

The Tea Partiers that damn near shut down the government a couple of months ago are mum on this one.

Hasn't anyone over there figured it out yet?  The time to worry about paying bills is when the spending occurs, not when the bills arrive.

Sheesh....



Going to save your way to prosperity are you? The problem with his proposal is that he has given the tea bagger republicans a blank check to start cutting.

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:56:36 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		Don`t pretend you`re interested in jobs or American success.

Your party but us in this mess and you don`t have a clue as to what to do,cept snipe and gripe and ruin our credit rating.

Where`s all the jobs from bush`s tax cuts?

Where`s the scary talented ideas for fixing the mess from you cons?

This is why Americans trust Obama more on the economy.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 7:56:58 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		So in your world two posters equals "most" ? As I said ...is there some way you could be less of an asshole? Anyway at all ?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 8:00:42 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


You view women who arent in total agreement with your ideology as subhuman?

No. Why do you ask such an assanine question?

That seems to be a trait that many leftists have in common, for whatever reason.

Another of your ill informed opinions stated with no validation


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Democrats like Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, who does not want the oil industry singled out for tax changes, object to parts of the bill. The White House has opposed breaking it up.


How difficult would it be to figure out who owns this bitch's mouth?




< Message edited by thompsonx -- 9/15/2011 8:02:04 AM >

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 8:05:09 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

So it isn`t the spending that`s making her hesitate.

It`s the impact on her constituency that`s making her think about it.

Only a retard would see that as anti-Obama policy.


If by "constituency" you mean the oil companies then it would make sense.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 8:08:26 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Because a "bitch" as you say, is a female dog

And the word you are looking for, a word you should feel intimately acquainted with, is asinine

Which, that sort of post is why I wrote you off as "vapid" up above.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


You view women who arent in total agreement with your ideology as subhuman?

No. Why do you ask such an assanine question?

That seems to be a trait that many leftists have in common, for whatever reason.

Another of your ill informed opinions stated with no validation


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Democrats like Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, who does not want the oil industry singled out for tax changes, object to parts of the bill. The White House has opposed breaking it up.


How difficult would it be to figure out who owns this bitch's mouth?





< Message edited by Sanity -- 9/15/2011 8:27:13 AM >

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 8:09:50 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Just two examples mike, the trend is far more widespread than that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

So in your world two posters equals "most" ? As I said ...is there some way you could be less of an asshole? Anyway at all ?


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. - 9/15/2011 8:26:46 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Because a "bitch" as you say, is a female dog

For a grown man to pretend that there is only one meaning for that word is truely asinine and proves once again that you are interested not in discussion but snark.

And the word you are looking for, a word you should feel intimately acquainted with, is asinine

When one concentrates on spelling errors it shows that they are not capable of addressing the discussion at hand.
Would you like to discuss why she wants to make the bill a la cart or would you rather discuss spelling?

Which, that sort of post is why I wrote that you are "vapid" up above.

If you would prefer to discuss spelling then vapid would be an appropriate lable for your choice.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Yay for spending, but not for paying for it. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094