LillyBoPeep -> RE: Would you be less inclined to submit to a man who'd been raped? (9/27/2011 4:40:13 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer 39% is still a pretty big figure, Arpig - especially given the presumably highly educated nature of the interviewees. TBH, with a new prospective partner, my gut instinct would tell me to stay quiet about any bi fantasies I've had, never mind bi experiences, and I'd absolutely stay quiet about being raped by another man. Me, to be blunt, I expect a certain 'unreconstructedness' amongst women when it comes to their view of men, even if they have the most right-on views about feminism. Sometimes I think women want men to be like rocks to stand on. They'd appreciate their being smoother around the edges, but when all's said and done the last thing they want is for them to move at all. We're supposed to be the devil they know. We shout sometimes, but we don't ever cry. that's an interesting post, Peon, and you're probably right, about some women anyway. as to the OP, if i found out someone had been raped, i'd be very sad. it doesn't change my opinion of a guy if he was beaten up, and if he was raped, i think i would empathize with that, given my own creepy background. something happening against your will is exactly that -- against your will. i wouldn't view someone as being "secretly subby" because of rape. i wouldn't view a Dominant woman who was raped in that way, so why would i view a man that way? my late M cried in front of me at a friend's funeral. he expressed the full range of human emotions, which made me feel like i could relate to him and trust him. he wasn't at all feminine or submissive and i respected every shred of him. i prefer men who can admit to feeling something to the "stoic old-school feel-nothing" types. D/s is about energy and interaction to me, not about things that happened to you, or if you cry or not. =p
|
|
|
|