RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals

RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:40:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im still waiting on the argument about how its not the man's place to prevent pregnancies. Do you think anyone disagrees that its a shared responsibility?

StrangerThan -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:40:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im curious... if men werent fucking those women who are too stupid to know who got them pregnant, this wouldnt be an issue at all. Not really speaking highly of the men, are they. Its often.. Man, I hit this fucking hot bitch last night... and could you believe it? All because I forgot to use a condom, this bitch is now pregnant. SHE TRAPPED ME! [8\|] Honestly, if you see a high side among she trapped me, and he's a shit head, then you're a true visionary. Because neither strike me as overly intelligent.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:41:14 AM)
I think all the comments so far have been against women, willbe. Especially yours.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:41:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im still waiting on the argument about how its not the man's place to prevent pregnancies. I'll vote for teamwork. Both parties working together to prevent em.

cuckoldmepls -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:42:26 AM)
What's wrong with that. Most people wouldn't even give their own dog an abortion.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:42:48 AM)
quote: Honestly, if you see a high side among she trapped me, and he's a shit head, then you're a true visionary. Because neither strike me as overly intelligent. Nope. Again, I disagree. Condoms are only 97% effective. BC pills 98%. But its perfectly ok for a man to forget, but not for a woman to screw up and get pregnant. A definite gender bias that you and willbe both have expressed.

Lucylastic -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:47:33 AM)
oh dear oh dear someone needs a backhoe

Hillwilliam -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:50:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls What's wrong with that. Most people wouldn't even give their own dog an abortion. Well, it's not like you can give your kid away in the shopping center parking lot when its 6 weeks old.

Lucylastic -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:52:17 AM)
or drown em in the closest river, or put em in a sack and bash their brains out

StrangerThan -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:56:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: Honestly, if you see a high side among she trapped me, and he's a shit head, then you're a true visionary. Because neither strike me as overly intelligent. Nope. Again, I disagree. Condoms are only 97% effective. BC pills 98%. But its perfectly ok for a man to forget, but not for a woman to screw up and get pregnant. A definite gender bias that you and willbe both have expressed. Men don't forget. They may forget to bring a condom to the dance, but forgetting is not an excuse when it comes to the act itself. Any man who says he forgot, is basically saying, I just couldn't wait to fuck her. You can also translate SHE TRAPPED ME as, I'm not responsible for my own actions. Therefore I should be neutered to prevent further disruption to the gene pool. And please, explain my gender bias.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 11:59:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: Honestly, if you see a high side among she trapped me, and he's a shit head, then you're a true visionary. Because neither strike me as overly intelligent. Nope. Again, I disagree. Condoms are only 97% effective. BC pills 98%. But its perfectly ok for a man to forget, but not for a woman to screw up and get pregnant. A definite gender bias that you and willbe both have expressed. Its Wednesday, Tazzy must have gotten her delivery of straw.

Lucylastic -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 12:07:59 PM)
get caught out again did you wilbur... every time someone proves you to be the dick head you are you do that. Be a man for fucks sake

Moonhead -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 12:12:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls What's wrong with that. Most people wouldn't even give their own dog an abortion. Well, it's not like you can give your kid away in the shopping center parking lot when its 6 weeks old. Or chuck your kid into the river in a sack containing a breezeblock without it causing legal problems, come to that...

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:26:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: StrangerThan quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Id like to know just how many women abort because the sperm donor is the issue. too many I fear Lol... it's like.. I was fucking this dumb, ugly, and stinking brute... and GOT PREGNANT.. can you believe it? Like what's up with that? Or is it, I fucked this dude and he was like cool and all but two days later i caught him texting with my friend. Fuck that shit. Or maybe, sigh, it's just me. I have a tendency to pick abusive assholes and did IT AGAIN. The bastard would be fertile you know. I'll be more careful next time I pick one. I'll make him wear a rubber damnit. While none of those have any connection any given person's reality, that's exactly what your post brought to mind. Gender bias. Until I brought up the fact that men are just as stupid as women when it comes to sex, it was all about the women. quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy The mother has just as much chance of being spiteful. If she genuinely doubts who the father is then maybe abortion is the best option, because she is probably unfit for parenthood anyway. Gender bias. She is unfot for parenthood because she slept with more than one man during a cycle. Lets not discuss the fact that it was just as much the man's responsibility as it was the woman's. Heaven forbid that thought even enter into the process.... Until Lucy and I bring it up, then suddenly they are both at fault.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:29:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Gender bias. She is unfot for parenthood because she slept with more than one man during a cycle. Until Lucy and I bring it up, then suddenly they are both at fault. Too bad youre wrong about why I think she's unfit for parenthood.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:30:52 PM)
Does not matter why.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:44:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Does not matter why. ROFL. Yes, because TG is the arbiter of everything.

Kirata -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:46:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle Too many republicans REALLY BELIEVE that women are their property. And too many assholes REALLY BELIEVE that children are "property." quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle When you can gestate, labor, and deliver a baby, you too will enjoy the exact same property rights as a future-mother. K.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:48:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Does not matter why. ROFL. Yes, because TG is the arbiter of everything. No, because its only your opinion. Unless you are going to go into why a man would be an unfit parents, then its still a gender biased opinion.

Lucylastic -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:50:17 PM)
"future mother" to me means gestating, which means its still in her body, her property, try taking it away from her.[;)]

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875