RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals

RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:50:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Does not matter why. ROFL. Yes, because TG is the arbiter of everything. No, because its only your opinion. Unless you are going to go into why a man would be an unfit parents, then its still a gender biased opinion. Because something is irrelevant to the topic and not discussed doesnt make what is discussed gender biased. Now go back to your little games with the other View girl.

Lucylastic -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:52:38 PM)
hahahhahahahahhahahhahahahhahaha poor lil willlur he cant stand it, plonker.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 2:59:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Does not matter why. ROFL. Yes, because TG is the arbiter of everything. No, because its only your opinion. Unless you are going to go into why a man would be an unfit parents, then its still a gender biased opinion. Because something is irrelevant to the topic and not discussed doesnt make what is discussed gender biased. Now go back to your little games with the other View girl. Has nothing to do with the topic. And Im sorry if you are out of joint because I called you out on this. But its obvious by your posts that you were pointing the finger at women and going "shame" while patting the guys on the back. Its a basic biological fact that it requires two people to begin a pregnancy. How many women, max, have you ever had sex with during a single month? Does that make you unfit to be a parent too?

SternSkipper -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 3:00:05 PM)
quote: quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle Too many republicans REALLY BELIEVE that women are their property. I can't stop giggling at how THIS is an argument on a BDSM Board.... I know I'm seeing it out of context but if ya simply posted "Too many REALLY BELIEVE that women are their property." over on say ... the Goreans ... It would spark an Armageddon of CrazyTalk<tm>

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 3:04:24 PM)
lol.... many people view other people as their property. My ex did too... even stated it as I was moving out.

cuckoldmepls -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 3:07:52 PM)
Are you insane or just don't have any common sense. It has nothing to do with thinking women are property. It has to do with a human life that some women believe they can destroy at their whim. I don't even see how you can correlate the two.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 3:11:10 PM)
Im not, idiot boy

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 3:25:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Has nothing to do with the topic. And Im sorry if you are out of joint because I called you out on this. But its obvious by your posts that you were pointing the finger at women and going "shame" while patting the guys on the back. Because something is "obvious" to you doesnt make it fact, just as you are insistent on the flip side of the coin..ignoring obvious facts.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 3:42:08 PM)
And yet you ignore, conveniently, the rest of that post.

Masta808 -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 4:04:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Im still waiting on the argument about how its not the man's place to prevent pregnancies. Do you think anyone disagrees that its a shared responsibility? Yes, The Tea Party Does. How could you forget this thread

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 4:12:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl And yet you ignore, conveniently, the rest of that post. Yes, why would I respond to yet another strawman of yours?

Masta808 -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 4:16:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic or drown em in the closest river, or put em in a sack and bash their brains out what there is no need for that. you can pull the plug after you tell the doctors you cant pay the bill.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 4:37:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl And yet you ignore, conveniently, the rest of that post. Yes, why would I respond to yet another strawman of yours? Ah so when you go off topic, its simply off topic. When I go off topic, its not a strawman. Unfortunately for you, its a direct question to something you brought into the conversation, namely that women who cannot name the father are unfit to be a parent. The flip side is that men who sleep around alot should also be unfit to be a parent. Unless, of course, you are going to insist there are different standards for men and women.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 4:44:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl And yet you ignore, conveniently, the rest of that post. Yes, why would I respond to yet another strawman of yours? Ah so when you go off topic, its simply off topic. When I go off topic, its not a strawman. Unfortunately for you, its a direct question to something you brought into the conversation, namely that women who cannot name the father are unfit to be a parent. The flip side is that men who sleep around alot should also be unfit to be a parent. Unless, of course, you are going to insist there are different standards for men and women. Sorry dear, but that isnt the flip side, that is your attempt to put words in my mouth. As I said earlier, but you as the final arbiter chose to ignore, it doesnt have fuck all to do with the woman sleeping around.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 4:46:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy The mother has just as much chance of being spiteful. If she genuinely doubts who the father is then maybe abortion is the best option, because she is probably unfit for parenthood anyway. Your words, not mine. Own them and admit your bias.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 4:47:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy The mother has just as much chance of being spiteful. If she genuinely doubts who the father is then maybe abortion is the best option, because she is probably unfit for parenthood anyway. Your words, not mine. Own them and admit your bias. My words dont say the reason she is probably unfit is because she slept around. Admit youre lying again.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 4:56:44 PM)
Not lying. Your meaning is quite clear. But, you may certainly put your spin on it and try and convince others you meant something else. Should be entertaining to see what excuse you come up with. Dont get upset when no one believes you.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 5:09:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Not lying. Your meaning is quite clear. But, you may certainly put your spin on it and try and convince others you meant something else. Should be entertaining to see what excuse you come up with. Dont get upset when no one believes you. The only thing that upsets me is your intellectual dishonesty. Just like your little girlfriend Psub, you try and put meanings on things that arent there, and then criticize someone for them. I give you no quarter for your health. Youve turned into a total waste of time.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 5:15:27 PM)
And I suppose that is supposed to hurt me. It doesnt. You have yet to "clarify" your meaning. I truly doubt you can. Matters little to me anymore. You ran from one heated debate because you were proven wrong. Now here you are trying to belittle me because you got caught. Talk about intellectual dishonesty. But, just so you know, you arent upsetting me. See, I had at one time mistakenly assumed that when you were right, you were right, and when you were wrong, you were man enough to admit it. Between this discussion and the one on Clinton's budget, you have proven me wrong. I can own up to my mistaken belief in you. I wished you could have owned up to your inappropriate post here and your mistaken reading on the previous thread. Problem with you shoving yourself up on a pedestal where you believe you are always right.... eventually, you are proven wrong.

StrangerThan -> RE: Anti-Choice Legislator Not Hiding True Goals (9/21/2011 5:45:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: StrangerThan quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Id like to know just how many women abort because the sperm donor is the issue. too many I fear Lol... it's like.. I was fucking this dumb, ugly, and stinking brute... and GOT PREGNANT.. can you believe it? Like what's up with that? Or is it, I fucked this dude and he was like cool and all but two days later i caught him texting with my friend. Fuck that shit. Or maybe, sigh, it's just me. I have a tendency to pick abusive assholes and did IT AGAIN. The bastard would be fertile you know. I'll be more careful next time I pick one. I'll make him wear a rubber damnit. While none of those have any connection any given person's reality, that's exactly what your post brought to mind. Gender bias. Until I brought up the fact that men are just as stupid as women when it comes to sex, it was all about the women. quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy The mother has just as much chance of being spiteful. If she genuinely doubts who the father is then maybe abortion is the best option, because she is probably unfit for parenthood anyway. Gender bias. She is unfot for parenthood because she slept with more than one man during a cycle. Lets not discuss the fact that it was just as much the man's responsibility as it was the woman's. Heaven forbid that thought even enter into the process.... Until Lucy and I bring it up, then suddenly they are both at fault. Gender bias my ass, unless you want to insinuate that lucy's comment doesn't point the direction of thought to a woman. God you are stretching this one.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078125