Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/1/2011 5:34:58 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline


But that wasn't Paul Newman, said as Looking at Elizabeth Taylor, was it?


Or maybe so.

No no, PN was "Brick," not "Big Daddy." Sorry.




< Message edited by Edwynn -- 10/1/2011 5:40:49 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/1/2011 5:41:06 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I am not sure that paul newman ever expounded on liz taylors increase in mass over the years.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/1/2011 6:04:04 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline


Because he was a gentleman, and Liz never got to Katie Alley proportions in any event.

But as to the propagation velocity Celery ...

If in the Champion juicer, then it is ~ 3k RPM. If in the "Jack Lalaine Power Jucier," then it is ~ 6k RPM.

I hope this settles the issue.

PS

Yes, Emily Latella is my dearly beloved aunt.





< Message edited by Edwynn -- 10/1/2011 6:08:02 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/1/2011 7:08:59 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Gentleman be damned!!! Physics is not the discipline of social graces.

Let the masses fall where they may, regardless of the feynmann diagrams and other strange behaviors!!!!

This is hardly a time for men to conserve energy.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/1/2011 7:10:25 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/1/2011 7:11:25 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Yeah he is talking about the quantum foam, the continual appearance and disappearance of pairs of virtual particles. Nothing whatever about a physical medium in which light moves which is what the ether was supposed to be. If you cannot understand the difference between a useful logical abstraction and a model of the physical universe perhaps you shouldn't be reading advanced physics.

Either you're not getting what Wilczek is clearly saying, or you just don't want to. He's not talking about abstractions. He's saying that empty space is filled with "so-called" (his words) virtual particles that are real and physical. Individually their existence may be extremely brief, but at any given moment space is a medium seething with them.

When it comes to hard science, that's as hard as it gets.

K.



No it isn't. You need to look up what virtual means. And no where does he or any other serious physicist say those theoretical particles exist in a physical medium similiar to air (which is once again what ether was supposed to be i.e. a medium that light propogated in like sound propogates in air). When M&M proved there was no ether they opened the door to showing that light was a particle, the photon, not a 'mechanical' disturbance of a medium like sound.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/1/2011 7:13:55 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Damn the tachyons, full light speed ahead!!!

I am sorry that I have but one quanta to give to my equivalence!!!!


(and all that rot)



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 3:26:33 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

No it isn't. You need to look up what virtual means.

Virtual particles are indeed real particles and have observable effects that physicists have devised ways of measuring. Their properties and consequences are well established...

Reference: Gordon Kane, Director, Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

And no where does he or any other serious physicist say those theoretical particles exist in a physical medium similiar to air...

Thanks for showing me your fish, but nowhere did I or anyone else (except that voice in your head) claim otherwise.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 10/2/2011 3:44:07 AM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 4:50:53 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

~FR~

Hey, Victor Schauberger thought that water had some sort of mind of it's own, even a spirit. He got logs to float upstream in a special-built flue, by way of temperature differences (very shallow slope, to be sure).

I've still not heard any definitive answer on the particle/wave question but the neat thing is how much we can do even with out that.  Getting to the moon and back and putting two go-karts on Mars tells me we are doing OK in the meantime.





< Message edited by Edwynn -- 10/2/2011 4:57:55 AM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 6:31:51 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

And no where does he or any other serious physicist say those theoretical particles exist in a physical medium similiar to air...

Thanks for showing me your fish, but nowhere did I or anyone else (except that voice in your head) claim otherwise.

K.[/font][/size]

You didn't? Seems someone has hacked your account and posted using it or you're lying.
quote:

But light does indeed propagate through a dynamic medium

quote:

he is saying that (so-called) empty space is a medium

quote:

space is a medium

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 7:21:18 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

You didn't? Seems someone has hacked your account and posted using it or you're lying.

Really? There's nothing in those quotes about particles existing in "a physical medium similar to air." Seems someone has hacked your account and posted using it, or else you're hallucinating.

Here's the picture. The universe we know arises out of the vibrating pure energy of a dynamical void. Mass is frequency. Even in so-called empty space, the universe is everywhere filled with elementary particles and their anti-particles -- coming into existence, moving a little, and then annihilating again -- forming a medium that Wilczek calls the modern ether.

It's a physical medium, unless you want to argue that quarks and electrons (etc.) aren't physical. But the particles don't exist in some "other" physical medium. They comprise the medium. Seems pretty clear to me....

Posted previously, quoting the presentation linked in this thread:

empty space is far from empty... constantly, in "apparently" empty space... every particle and it's anti-particle fluctuate to make this modern ether. Because ether got a bad reputation, and the nineteenth century models of it were impoverished and wrong, I want to use a different word for the modern concept of empty space as a medium, but the spirit of the ether lives on.

For background, from the Ford/MIT Nobel Laureate Lecture Series:

The Universe is a Strange Place

Now if you like, you can watch this and then tell me that it doesn't mean what he plainly says, or that I've claimed something I never did, so we can repeat this whole adventure. Won't that be fun?

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 10/2/2011 8:20:00 AM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 10:23:48 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

You didn't? Seems someone has hacked your account and posted using it or you're lying.

Really? There's nothing in those quotes about particles existing in "a physical medium similar to air." Seems someone has hacked your account and posted using it, or else you're hallucinating.

Here's the picture. The universe we know arises out of the vibrating pure energy of a dynamical void. Mass is frequency. Even in so-called empty space, the universe is everywhere filled with elementary particles and their anti-particles -- coming into existence, moving a little, and then annihilating again -- forming a medium that Wilczek calls the modern ether.

It's a physical medium, unless you want to argue that quarks and electrons (etc.) aren't physical. But the particles don't exist in some "other" physical medium. They comprise the medium. Seems pretty clear to me....

Posted previously, quoting the presentation linked in this thread:

empty space is far from empty... constantly, in "apparently" empty space... every particle and it's anti-particle fluctuate to make this modern ether. Because ether got a bad reputation, and the nineteenth century models of it were impoverished and wrong, I want to use a different word for the modern concept of empty space as a medium, but the spirit of the ether lives on.

For background, from the Ford/MIT Nobel Laureate Lecture Series:

The Universe is a Strange Place

Now if you like, you can watch this and then tell me that it doesn't mean what he plainly says, or that I've claimed something I never did, so we can repeat this whole adventure. Won't that be fun?

K.



WTF do you think medium means in this context?

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/medium
quote:

an intervening substance, as air, through which a force acts or an effect is produced.
.
quote:

4. an intervening substance or agency for transmitting or producing an effect; vehicle: air is a medium for sound

quote:

a substance regarded as the means of transmission of a force or effect

quote:

An intervening substance through which something else is transmitted or carried on.

quote:

A substance that makes possible the transfer of energy from one location to another, especially through waves. For example, matter of sufficient density can be a medium for sound waves, which transfer mechanical energy


As to your selective quoting of the nobel winner, did you miss the part where he explicitly stated that the 'grid' was strictly a concept not something that actually exists?

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 12:14:43 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

Aw take it easy, Ken. I'm just foolin' with you. I know my catechism. And to show you that I'm sincere, I'll even leave a little something in the collection plate on my way out.

K.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 1:18:16 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


Aw take it easy, Ken. I'm just foolin' with you. I know my catechism. And to show you that I'm sincere, I'll even leave a little something in the collection plate on my way out.

K.


So again you were simply full of shit and didn't know fuck all what you were talking about. Why not stay out of science and technology related threads since you have no fucking clue what you are talking about?

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 1:31:57 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

So again you were simply full of shit and didn't know fuck all what you were talking about. Why not stay out of science and technology related threads since you have no fucking clue what you are talking about?

I realize this hasn't occured to you, but that only works when people can't read the posts leading up to it.

K.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 2:48:14 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

So again you were simply full of shit and didn't know fuck all what you were talking about. Why not stay out of science and technology related threads since you have no fucking clue what you are talking about?

I realize this hasn't occured to you, but that only works when people can't read the posts leading up to it.

K.


So is there or is there not a medium without which light cannot propogate? You claimed there was and made several posts trying to twist a major theoroticians words to say there was. Then you said there wasn't. Now you're claiming you didn't make the initial claim, despite me having quoted the times when you did.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 3:01:30 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

So is there or is there not a medium without which light cannot propogate? You claimed there was and made several posts trying to twist a major theoroticians words to say there was. Then you said there wasn't. Now you're claiming you didn't make the initial claim, despite me having quoted the times when you did.

Okay, seriously... I never said that light requires a medium in which to propagate, without which it cannot. I never claimed that anyone else said that. And you never quoted such a statement.

Get some rest.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 10/2/2011 3:14:15 PM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 5:03:13 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

So is there or is there not a medium without which light cannot propogate? You claimed there was and made several posts trying to twist a major theoroticians words to say there was. Then you said there wasn't. Now you're claiming you didn't make the initial claim, despite me having quoted the times when you did.

Okay, seriously... I never said that light requires a medium in which to propagate, without which it cannot. I never claimed that anyone else said that. And you never quoted such a statement.

Get some rest.

K.


You claimed repeatedly that the ether existed and called it a medium. If you didn't know what the terms meant why did you use them repeatedly?

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 9:05:52 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

So is there or is there not a medium without which light cannot propogate? You claimed there was and made several posts trying to twist a major theoroticians words to say there was. Then you said there wasn't. Now you're claiming you didn't make the initial claim, despite me having quoted the times when you did.

Okay, seriously... I never said that light requires a medium in which to propagate, without which it cannot. I never claimed that anyone else said that. And you never quoted such a statement.

Get some rest.

K.


You claimed repeatedly that the ether existed and called it a medium. If you didn't know what the terms meant why did you use them repeatedly?


Huh?



Einstein was involved with aether theories of the time (one of his first papers was titled, "The Investigation of the State of Aether in Magnetic Fields").


He had access to patents and documentation as he worked as a library clerk at the Swiss patent office since 1902 and undoubtedly gave more than a good look at them, before the Relativistic theory popped up for the second time (the original being the theory of Boscovich). Einstein himself said, "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources". [and that included all the shit he stole from his ex-wife across the pond who was the true genius NOT him!]Einstein has been accused, by his detractors (historically and even recently), of plagiarizing other people's work without giving them any credit. Einstein's work at the patent office early in his career gave him plenty of information, also.

Aether is the "ultimate" medium (Tesla often interchanged the term "medium" with "aether") - being a perfect fluid and transporting independent carriers. Tesla said that electromagnetic radiation was propagated, like sound waves in the ether.



Albert Einstein's Aether

Concerning the Investigation of the State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein

"When the electric current comes into being, it immediately sets the surrounding aether in some kind of instantaneous motion, the nature of which has still not been exactly determined. In spite of the continuation of the cause of this motion, namely the electric current, the motion ceases, but the aether remains in a potential state and produces a magnetic field. That the magnetic field is a potential state [of the aether] is shown by the [existence of a] permanent magnet, since the principle of conservation of energy excludes the possibility of a state of motion in this case. The motion of the aether, which is caused by an electric current, will continue until the acting [electro-] motive forces are compensated by the equivalent passive forces which arise from the deformation caused by the motion of the aether itself."

Einstein observes that the potential state of the Aether is shown by the existence of a permanent magnet, just as in the cathode ray tube and ferrofluid experiments above.

"The most interesting, but also the most difficult, task would be the direct experimental study of the magnetic field which arises around an electric current, because the investigation of the elastic state of the aether in this case would allow us to obtain a glimpse of the mysterious nature of the electric current. This analogy also permits us to draw definite conclusions concerning the state of the aether in the magnetic field which surrounds the electric current, provided of course the experiments mentioned above yield any result."

The "elastic state" of the Aether refers to the Aether's fluid behavior and its ability to return to a previous state without deformation. The insights into the "mysterious" nature of the electric current refers to the two different types of charges identified in the Aether Physics Model. Not only does electricity have a bipolar electrostatic charge, but it also has a bipolar electromagnetic charge. These two types of charges interact with each other in seemingly peculiar ways. Einstein could not have known it during his time, however, the two types of charges are the actual carriers of the forces quantified in his later developed, General Relativity theory.

"I believe that the quantitative researches on the absolute magnitudes of the density and the elastic force of the aether can only begin if qualitative results exist that are connected with established ideas. Let me add one more thing. If the wavelength does not turn out to be proportional to [sic], then the reason (for that) has to be looked for in the change of density of the moving aether caused by the elastic deformations; here A is the elastic aether force, a priori a constant which we have to determine empirically, and k the (variable) strength of the magnetic field which, of course, is proportional to the elastic forces in question that are produced."

The elastic Aether force Einstein presumes has been quantified in the Aether Physics Model as the Gforce. And, in fact, we have developed simple force laws for the electromagnetic charge, which are similar in structure to the Coulomb electrostatic force law and the Newton gravitational law. We also show that each of these force laws, including our strong force laws, directly involve the Gforce (elastic Aether force as Einstein called it). The total of all these simple and related force laws comprise the Unified Force Theory of the Aether Physics Model.
[link to www.16pi2.com]

for those who grovel at the steiners feet LOL

doo dee do




oh yeh and:

Tesla published a prepared statement on his 81st birthday (July 10, 1937) critiquing Albert Einstein's theory of relativity. The following is a portion of that statement:
"... Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature.

All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion.

So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.
"

"My second discovery was of a physical truth of the greatest importance. As I have searched the entire scientific records in more than a half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment." Nikola Tesla

[Inventor of the electricity you use today in your house along with motors flouescent bubls and the whole shooting match!  NOT stienboy.]


Tesla never referred to "space-time" directly, referring instead to the concept of the "primary substance". He also never used this relativistic "twin" term. He considered time as a mere man-made "measure" of the rate at which events occur such as a distance travelled (in miles or kms) in a certain period of time, for a frame of reference. He considered the "curving" of space to be absurd (putting it in gentle terms) saying that if a moving body curved space the "equal and opposite" reaction of space on the body would "straighten space back out".

steiner boy was a doofus and set real science back over 100 years with his curved asswipe.




< Message edited by Real0ne -- 10/2/2011 9:33:39 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/2/2011 9:23:58 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Okay, seriously... I never said that light requires a medium in which to propagate, without which it cannot. I never claimed that anyone else said that. And you never quoted such a statement.

Get some rest.

K.




nope I DID!

and I stand by it.

Tesla is the king big dick of science and physics.

K, run down to a local neon sign store, pick up a 50 buck 15-20,000 volt transformer, add a rotating  spark gap then hold your hand 4-5 inches from one of the wires going to the gap.

You will feel it literal slug you when the spark blows out at the peak of the 60cycle sine wave.

You can repeat this placing the wires in a vacuum tube and then hold the glass and you will still feel it slug you "through a vacuum"!!.

watch the movie the entity only it feel like someone hit you.

Cannot get that if an ether did not exist.

Unless of course ken wants to tell us how he can feel electrons or an electromagnetic wave moving through a vacuum in space that feels like someone slugged you.

Then continue to tell us how "some-thing" can travel on or in "no-thing".

You have a logical fallacy not to mention physical impossibility.


No I didnt publish shit it was just used as a fun show and tell toy.

Oh and if you want to see mortified fear, put it on an insulated table, and hand the wire to a friend, tell them to play with it for a while making a breaking the arc, (4 - 5 inches), then when they get kicked most will drop the wire thinking they got a shock and then after they realize they did not slowly turn and look at you in dismay.

I had shit loads of fun with that LOL




< Message edited by Real0ne -- 10/2/2011 9:45:35 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit - 10/3/2011 7:50:02 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

uff a
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Did you watch the video or read the book? What he calls the 'grid' is a conceptual construct. He's talking about thinking of empty space as a medium ( see 21 minutes into the lecture.)

Are you just googling stuff and posting anything you think agrees with you without doing any research?

More to the point, are you so fucked up that your mind can't process anything that doesn't agree with you?

He is not talking about just "thinking" of empty space as a medium, he is saying that (so-called) empty space is a medium. He shows a clip, stating "this is the deep structure of reality ... going on all the time and everywhere." Not to put too fine a point on it, he continues...

empty space is far from empty... constantly, in "apparently" empty space... every particle and it's anti-particle fluctuate to make this modern ether. Because ether got a bad reputation, and the nineteenth century models of it were impoverished and wrong, I want to use a different word for the modern concept of empty space as a medium, but the spirit of the ether lives on.

I hope that answers your questions. Thank you so much for asking.

K.



tesla dealt with the anti side of the equation and produced several working machines, the transmitter included that uses this side of the equation, and that was over 100 years ago!

MIT is better named "MQF" massive quantum failure, they failed in cold fusion and they failed on the electrics as well.

The reason is that its all about manipulating grant money and getting accredation.

You will soon see several gubafia agencies take credit for Teslas work.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Breaking the ultimate speed limit Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109