PETA angry at NYTimes (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

GreedyTop -> PETA angry at NYTimes (9/29/2011 10:30:11 PM)

http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/food/is-this-chicken-too-sexy-peta-thinks-so-2572348/

I thought the photo was funny, myself...



Iamsemisweet -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/29/2011 10:45:26 PM)

PETA is a bunch of fucking idiots. It is scary they get so much publicity, they aren't just silly, they have a dark agenda.



Termyn8or -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 12:04:13 AM)

"The image was intended as a humorous, eye-catching approach to your standard food fetish art. But PETA's Newkirk is calling it necrophilia. "

And who are they to say that there is somethng wrong with necrophilia. Who died and made them boss ?

I don't know about these assholes on this planet for the duration of the human reign sofar, but they are pretty stupid. My people do not mourn death, we celebrate it. Not that suicide is acceptable, you have a sentence to serve on this planet. No cutting out.

Having sex with the dead ? Well let me tell you a secret; you CANNOT HAVE SEX WITH THE DEAD. You can have sex with thier body, but they are not there and really they do not care.

Even if there is a Santa Claus, Saint Peter and everything and you are wafted up to heaven by Angels and asked all this shit about your life [which is over by the way], does anyone up there give a shit what is happening to your dead ass carcass at the moment ?

Let's say seventeen guys fuck a dead Woman's body, now that can rake in a hundred or two maybe. Does Saint Peter want a cut ? And she ain't there so she doesn't care.

To me and mine death is a passing into another plane of existence. No god or anyone less could understand, see we are uninfluenced by all the bullshit. My best guess is better than any religious "leader" on this planet. They can go.... you know......

All this is nothing but study to me. That includes everything I read here BTW.

PETA is a religion, that is that. They are just as fucked up as any other religion.

I am not surprised at all. And wasn't twenty years ago when I found out they were a bunch of assholes under the control of a bunch of suits. Some of you know what that really means. Use it.

T^T



DeviantlyD -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 1:23:09 AM)

To Termyn8or:

quote:

Dalai Lama

Actions driven solely by anger are of no use at all; realizing this can help strengthen your determination to resist it.


Quoted from the Dalai Lama's Twitter page http://twitter.com/#!/DalaiLama



SuzeCheri -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 2:50:14 AM)

I agree, it was funny. PETA are just looking to keep their name in the headlines is all, that's why they are kicking up a stink.



Termyn8or -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 3:00:46 AM)

"Actions driven solely by anger are of no use at all; realizing this can help strengthen your determination to resist it."

Dali who ?

This driven by anger thing I knew since I was ten. But I still said "fuck you" to the world for another few decades.

And PETA, fuck, I am the most carivorous human yo uwill meet in some time. A day without meat ? I might b dead. Not rally but.........

T^T



NocturnalStalker -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 4:06:18 AM)

"For every animal you don't eat I'll eat three."



BurntKitty -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 5:01:13 AM)

I thought it was comical. But then I like this one, too-

[image]http://myfoodlooksfunny.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/e06f2eb2-1341-4f34-94a3-3b9afe5b8deb.jpg[/image]



xxblushesxx -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 5:38:21 AM)

Don't make fun of my food fetish! Ykinmybiok...[;)][:D]



thishereboi -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 6:04:13 AM)

I haven't heard anything about PETA lately. Nice to see they are still the same wack jobs that I remember. I have to wonder if Ingrid is seeking help for her chicken fetish. It's no wonder she is so against eating the little guys if she sees them as potential sex partners.



servantforuse -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 6:07:14 AM)

I know ot's and old one but so what. PETA People Eating Tasty Animals.



SternSkipper -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 6:20:10 AM)

quote:


I thought the photo was funny, myself...


I fucking HATE PETA! You know how hard it's going to be to get some alone time with the thanksgiving turkey now?????



SternSkipper -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 6:22:21 AM)

quote:

I thought it was comical. But then I like this one, too-

Hey ... ah ... Burnkitty... you wouldn't happen to have HER number, would yau? And can ya hurry? I kinda want to speak with her before sunday at dinner hour.



SternSkipper -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 6:23:43 AM)

quote:

"For every animal you don't eat I'll eat three."

STICK TO STALKING CELEBRITIES YOU ANIMAL!



FirmhandKY -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 6:24:28 AM)

FR:

PETA's Planning to Launch a Porn Site
Aug 22, 2011

The attention-hungry activists at PETA want to launch a pornography site that combines "a lot of girl and boy next door content" with pictures of animals being mistreated. Pending their application to the the operators of the .xxx domain, the animal rights organization wants to spread their message as widely as possible and isn't shy about the power of sex appeal.

Firm



xxblushesxx -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 6:38:57 AM)

Gross!! Stay away from my good clean sex ya PETA freaks!



VirginPotty -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 7:07:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/food/is-this-chicken-too-sexy-peta-thinks-so-2572348/

I thought the photo was funny, myself...


Guess we've found our next SVU episode!



LillyBoPeep -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 7:54:15 AM)

considering that PETA relies on painting naked women like animals to speak out against circuses, or sending people running naked through the street to protest the fur industry, or drawing meat cuts on the backs and butts of naked women, etc etc etc, i find it absolutely HILARIOUS that they have any complaint about sex.

that said, when people pose dead animals in funny ways, it bothers me. it's like they're making a joke out of the death of the animal, and what happens to the food? since they've been fiddling around with it all day for photo shoots, they probably throw it away, and do you know how many people on this planet are starving to death? how many people in our own country can't get food? ask a person to donate some canned goods and you get a nice American "i don't want them living off MYYYYY dollars!" but ask someone to waste perfectly edible food in a photo shoot or a comedic stunt, and you got it.

i may be a vegetarian, but if they're going to kill the animal, at least USE IT in a way that makes its death at least partially worthwhile. don't pose it for stupid photos and then throw it away.

people piss me off.



DesFIP -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 8:21:40 AM)

Lilly, they throw away the vegetables after hours taking photos. The stuff is on the counter under hot lights, gathering bacteria. Feeding it to someone is akin to poisoning them.



Kaliko -> RE: PETA angry at NYTimes (9/30/2011 8:47:38 AM)

I find it offensive. Not because I'm so delicate and I can't look at a dead chicken, but because it is a disheartening humanity that treats other living beings that we share our earth with in such a disrespectful manner.



Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1103516