Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: He who makes a beast of himself...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: He who makes a beast of himself... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 5:40:30 AM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker

quote:

But I would like to experience the mindset of the opposite sex.


"Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Ooo, football.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  I want ribs.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex."

As opposed to...

"Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Be subtle.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Ooo, shopping.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  $130 for those boots?  I like them but can't afford them!  Marriage.  Marriage.  Marriage."

And before any of the turbo-feminists come crying, relax.



Turbo feminist?

_____________________________

ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

(in reply to NocturnalStalker)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 6:53:35 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: strongbottom88


quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

Never trust a man to be good if he doesn't have the strength of character to be bad"

Being "A Man" is inherently rife with moral ambiguity, it's the human condition really, and I think for both sexes, noesis - mindless rutting, dominance and submission, etc., is a much needed release, anoesis, provided it's done consensually and ethically, lol.

Only a true psychopath is ever entirely free form moral ambiguity, and the need to resolve it, even when it's unresolvable, it's the part of our mammalian brain that makes social co-operation possible.




Well put, and certainly much more succintly put than my post.
Well, it wasn't the whole thing, lol, you covered a lot of the details, all of which apply, and I loosely refer to as "moral ambiguity" - but see Gilgamesh, Nietzsche, etc. - hell, look at catholics: the missionary position is prescribed for the sole reason that it's less "beastly", the denial of evolution etc., I think we all know that beneath the veneer of civilization lies... more civilization.

i.e., being "an animal" is supposed to be some big insult, but when it comes to mammals, we have pretty much all of them beat when it comes to mistreating our own.

Well, I guess some of the males of other species do eat their own offspring, but I mean besides that.

(in reply to strongbottom88)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 7:17:13 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
I haven't read the whole thread but as a FR to the OP, I have to assume it isn't just men but women also. Else we would not have any problems with addiction. Because what else is an addiction, but a way to avoid the pain of being a thinking, feeling being with self awareness.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 7:41:54 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
I loathe the beast.

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 9:46:11 AM   
Anaxagoras


Posts: 3086
Joined: 5/9/2009
From: Eire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
That a reference to the line in Closer: "wanna fuck you like an animal"? A female Trent Reznor perhaps... but hopefully not into horrible stuff like dolcette!!

I've always found that song a bit disturbing in the sense that he seems more about the fuck than he is about the "who" in the fuck. It's like it could be anyone he deems fuckable. Maybe that wasn't the lyricist's intent, but it's how it comes across to me.

Maybe Closer is more about himself then the other person overall? I didn't really like it as much as some of his other stuff.


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD
We all like to tease, when we have the upper hand. ;)

Never a truer thing has been said!

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 1:00:09 PM   
LillyBoPeep


Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

*jealous of Icarys*




Pack your bags. If you can stand to see me and only me for months at a time lol.

I'm not sure I could do THAT.


Uhmmm...it's too cold...rendering any further argument a sort of moot point for me. Not that you asked me, since you asked Lilly...*sniffs*...but I'd tell her "hey LillyBoPeep! It's too dang cold there!!!". *grin*


have you seen the kind of cabbage they grow there?! it's out of this world!


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD
quote:

ORIGINAL: blacksword404

I couldn't say. I have always been a man. The hardship i may bear as a man I have always born. I suspect life can be hard whether man or woman. But the trials tend to be different for both.

I am wrath,pain, cunning and strength wrapped in a calmly destructive package. That part of us is what allows us to dominate. I can unlease it at any time. Otherwise I probably have other stuff to do.


Calmly destructive? Care to elaborate? :)


i would like some elaboration there, too. that's interesting. ^_^


_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica


(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 1:45:42 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker

quote:

But I would like to experience the mindset of the opposite sex.


"Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Ooo, football.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  I want ribs.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex."

As opposed to...

"Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Be subtle.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  Ooo, shopping.  Sex.  Sex.  Sex.  $130 for those boots?  I like them but can't afford them!  Marriage.  Marriage.  Marriage."

And before any of the turbo-feminists come crying, relax.



Turbo feminist?

A feminist with a muscle car.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 6:43:39 PM   
strongbottom88


Posts: 40
Joined: 9/10/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: strongbottom88


I am new to the site, but this quote resonates with me on a few different levels. Since the post seems to be looking for serious responses from men on how they can relate to the quote here is at least a half-serious attempt at an answer.

First I think it could also follow that "He who gets rid of the pain of being a man makes a beast of himself," (and if he goes far enough and lacks or is stripped of basic empathy, a sociopath) or that He who makes a man of himself gets rid of the pain of being a beast (in the sense that a beast may feel no real purpose in existing other than surviving)

I grew up in a rough environment where I learned and was openly taught that for men any showing of emotion was a sign of weakness (except for a certain boys will be boys range of emotions including ocassional bouts of anger, lewdness, silliness, and self-destructiveness) Different class backgrounds etc. will tend to create different expectations, but there is also generally some socialized expectation of success - be it being a successful thug, professional, provider, or what have you.

Another theme that is intertwined with this internal tension (at least for hetero guys) is coming to understand the power that women have over us, while alos coming to understand women as the "fairer" sex that needs to be approached with a certain tact that differs greatly from how I was otherwise socialized. When you couple all of this up with male hormones or whatever other forces tend to make men big, strong, horny and hairy, you wind up with a whole lot of bottled up energy that leads to internal conflict, restlessness and perhaps what could fairly be described as a certain internalized form of male "pain".

Ultimately, all of this conflict, internal tension etc. needs to be released in some form or another. For me in my youth this took the form of ocassional physical brawls, petty crime, meaningless sex, and lots of self-destructiveness and risk taking often intensified through drug and alcohol use. I am talking serious self-destructiveness to the point where a number of my friends from my youth died living the "fast life" and I came very close multiple times. I ultimately found myself (after certain life transforming events) in a situation where I had an opportunity to recieve a tremendous education and got exposed to people from much more "civil" backgrounds and who had very different understandings of what being a man entails. This did lead to channeling some of my "beastly" energy into more productive pursuits, but I still needed frequent releases to deal with the "pain" of my understanding of what it was to be a man.

As I have gotten older, maturity, insight, somewhat wiser targeting of how and when I release the "beast" and a more manageable level of energy have lessened this internal pain or tension, but it still exists.

In a BDSM context, I find I have found comfort in the opposite fashion to what you might expect. Because I have always seen women as the "fairer" sex and I have found it more comfortable to offer up the beast to be harnessed by a woman in a more productive way (hence, one of the reasons I indentify as submissive despite having many dominant personality characteristics). As a bottom, it is even clearer to me. I love really hard and rough edge play, because it tends to both release and to then tame the beast. At the same time, I see myself as being able to endure a level of being pushed physically (and to a lesser extent mentally) to the edge very roughly in a manner I don't think I could ever bring myself to treat a woman and I have known some tough women. (I have some switchy tendencies, but they tend to come out in a more vanilla context than in any type of heavy bdsm or edge play)

Well, off of the top of my head, that is about all that I have. Anyhow, hopefully this is the type of insight you were looking for.


I had to smile reading your second to last sentence. Off the top of your head? I see your post as very thoughtful and insightful. Thank you.

And I know exactly what you mean about the switchy tendencies coming out more in a vanilla context. I very much relate to that idea.

Your words suggest you find a certain catharsis in rough edge play. Would you say that's a fair statement?

I have this question in mind for you, but I'm having difficulty finding the words to phrase it in the way that I want. Plus, it makes some assumptions about you, based on what you've written and that may not be a fair assessment.

You say the beast within you is both released and tamed during rough play. But it's always there, true? And you had mentioned you could never bring yourself to treat a woman in such a way. It seems that being taught to treat women as the fairer sex as an ingrained part of your being. So is that belief the only reason for why you see yourself as never being able to treat a woman in that way? Do you ever allow your inner beast, as it were, to dictate your intimate interactions with a woman?



My first reaction to your reaction to my original post is to point out that I was responding specificly to the quote you started the thread with. The reasons I would be inlcined to identify as a bottom and to a certain extent a submissive as opposed to a top or dominant are more numerous. First of all, I find aggression and a sadistic streak in women to be hot (not necessarily for them to have it for a 24/7 basis - that could be too much, but definitely within a scene and during play). Secondly, I'm not too inclined to seek mentorship or direction from anyone, but when I do, it is far easier for me to seek it from a woman. Even with something like martial arts or weightlifting tips, I would be more comfortable with a woman as a trainer. I generally avoid situations where other men have any kind of authority or power over me in any context to the greatest extent reasonably possible. Therefore, to the extent I am drawn to seeking it, I seek guidance from women. Finally, while I do have fantasies of "ravaging" women, I have even more fantasies about being ravaged by them - although given my size, ravage is a more subtle thing than I would imagine a woman half my size would envision by being ravaged by me.

To specifically answer your questions, yes it would be fair to say that edge play does have a cathartic effect on me. I can also say that I do enjoying both topping and bottoming when it comes to more moderate bondage/pleasurable - moderate pain scenes, though again, I enjoy bottoming even more and to too top I generally have to know the woman very well and have experienced bottoming to her.

When it comes to really rough and brutal edge play scenes, that is where I believe I would really struggle being a top even if I knew that is what a woman really wanted. I have been fortunate enough (at least from a masochistic standpoint) to have had a couple of longer term play partners who are/were highly sadistic. One of them is little more than half of my size and during some bondage scenes she could punch and knee, and even kick me at full force until she was breathing hard and sweating and she could bite me to the point of drawing blood. She understood what my vital areas were and avoided them, and she could pretty much cut entirely loose in a way I could never safely do if the situation were reversed. Similarly, I made no secret that breath play is one of my few hard limits and in many a scene she would cover my mouth while letting me breath through my nose, she would lightly choke me and even cut air for just a second always letting up just at the edge for me. These types of scenes definitely tend to bring the beast out of me in terms of fighting and stuggling, but I have already willingly given up control by allowing bondage and at some point in those types of scenes I am pushed near a breaking point and have to trust her read of me which she always got. That is an enormous rush and, for me an enormously calming experience. She also totally got aftercare and switching to a nurturing role when I was close to a breaking point in a scene. This is all pretty complex play and I do not think I would have it in me to do the same to her. I do not know how much this is a result of a societal engraining of seeing her as more fragile (sounds kind of sexist in a way I guess) versus something more deeply psychological or even innate. It is just too difficult to figure stuff like that out.

I would offer that I find a certain beauty in women that brings a peace to me (I am not suggesting that guys who are sadistic tops or dominants do not, just trying to explain how it works for me). For example, I am very prone to road rage when people drive stupidly, but I had one girlfriend who knew how to calm me just by talking softly in that situation (and if anyone else tried to calm me it would only tick me off more). In that sense, women I turst have tended to calm the beast in me far more than bring it out - ravaging fantasies aside.

So to sum up, yes, despite societal conditioning and other factors working against it, I can be inclined to "ravage" from time to time, but only in a controlled way with a woman I know very well. On the other hand, being really pushed in edge play is something deeply satisfying to me with a woman I trust, but something it would be almost impossible for me to do in return.

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 10:31:29 PM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

*jealous of Icarys*




Pack your bags. If you can stand to see me and only me for months at a time lol.

I'm not sure I could do THAT.


Uhmmm...it's too cold...rendering any further argument a sort of moot point for me. Not that you asked me, since you asked Lilly...*sniffs*...but I'd tell her "hey LillyBoPeep! It's too dang cold there!!!". *grin*


have you seen the kind of cabbage they grow there?! it's out of this world!


I will risk forsaking out of this world cabbage in favour of livin' da island life. :D





_____________________________

ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/10/2011 10:40:34 PM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: strongbottom88

My first reaction to your reaction to my original post is to point out that I was responding specificly to the quote you started the thread with.


Please don't take anything I said in response to your post as a form of criticism. I was simply intrigued. Your post evoked more questions that I tried to articulate in my response. :)


quote:

ORIGINAL: strongbottom88

The reasons I would be inlcined to identify as a bottom and to a certain extent a submissive as opposed to a top or dominant are more numerous. First of all, I find aggression and a sadistic streak in women to be hot (not necessarily for them to have it for a 24/7 basis - that could be too much, but definitely within a scene and during play). Secondly, I'm not too inclined to seek mentorship or direction from anyone, but when I do, it is far easier for me to seek it from a woman. Even with something like martial arts or weightlifting tips, I would be more comfortable with a woman as a trainer. I generally avoid situations where other men have any kind of authority or power over me in any context to the greatest extent reasonably possible. Therefore, to the extent I am drawn to seeking it, I seek guidance from women. Finally, while I do have fantasies of "ravaging" women, I have even more fantasies about being ravaged by them - although given my size, ravage is a more subtle thing than I would imagine a woman half my size would envision by being ravaged by me.

To specifically answer your questions, yes it would be fair to say that edge play does have a cathartic effect on me. I can also say that I do enjoying both topping and bottoming when it comes to more moderate bondage/pleasurable - moderate pain scenes, though again, I enjoy bottoming even more and to too top I generally have to know the woman very well and have experienced bottoming to her.

When it comes to really rough and brutal edge play scenes, that is where I believe I would really struggle being a top even if I knew that is what a woman really wanted. I have been fortunate enough (at least from a masochistic standpoint) to have had a couple of longer term play partners who are/were highly sadistic. One of them is little more than half of my size and during some bondage scenes she could punch and knee, and even kick me at full force until she was breathing hard and sweating and she could bite me to the point of drawing blood. She understood what my vital areas were and avoided them, and she could pretty much cut entirely loose in a way I could never safely do if the situation were reversed. Similarly, I made no secret that breath play is one of my few hard limits and in many a scene she would cover my mouth while letting me breath through my nose, she would lightly choke me and even cut air for just a second always letting up just at the edge for me. These types of scenes definitely tend to bring the beast out of me in terms of fighting and stuggling, but I have already willingly given up control by allowing bondage and at some point in those types of scenes I am pushed near a breaking point and have to trust her read of me which she always got. That is an enormous rush and, for me an enormously calming experience. She also totally got aftercare and switching to a nurturing role when I was close to a breaking point in a scene. This is all pretty complex play and I do not think I would have it in me to do the same to her. I do not know how much this is a result of a societal engraining of seeing her as more fragile (sounds kind of sexist in a way I guess) versus something more deeply psychological or even innate. It is just too difficult to figure stuff like that out.

I would offer that I find a certain beauty in women that brings a peace to me (I am not suggesting that guys who are sadistic tops or dominants do not, just trying to explain how it works for me). For example, I am very prone to road rage when people drive stupidly, but I had one girlfriend who knew how to calm me just by talking softly in that situation (and if anyone else tried to calm me it would only tick me off more). In that sense, women I turst have tended to calm the beast in me far more than bring it out - ravaging fantasies aside.

So to sum up, yes, despite societal conditioning and other factors working against it, I can be inclined to "ravage" from time to time, but only in a controlled way with a woman I know very well. On the other hand, being really pushed in edge play is something deeply satisfying to me with a woman I trust, but something it would be almost impossible for me to do in return.



Thanks, once again, for such a thoughtful response. I appreciate it. It's interesting to hear your personal experiences. Again, I enjoyed reading them. Thank you for sharing them. :)

_____________________________

ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

(in reply to strongbottom88)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/11/2011 6:48:43 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

Never trust a man to be good if he doesn't have the strength of character to be bad"

Being "A Man" is inherently rife with moral ambiguity, it's the human condition really, and I think for both sexes, noesis - mindless rutting, dominance and submission, etc., is a much needed release, anoesis, provided it's done consensually and ethically, lol.

Only a true psychopath is ever entirely free form moral ambiguity, and the need to resolve it, even when it's unresolvable, it's the part of our mammalian brain that makes social co-operation possible.


But....do you find a pain associated with it? Is there anything there, within you, that creates a form of need to rid yourself of what you might define as "the pain of being a man", in whatever way you might define that to be? On the page where the quote is preceded by the conversation Dr. Johnson had with the woman he uttered those words to, I sense he's telling her that men do what they do (behave as beasts) to get rid of those difficulties associated with their gender and he's telling her this because he sees that she cannot possibly know what it is like to be a man and have to deal with those negative aspects of what it means to be a man.




From the posts I've seen here, it would appear that men don't have that sort of pain. Certainly there are societal expectations that make it difficult for men to be human beings...but all in all, it seems that generally speaking, it may not be so difficult to bear that in creates in them this need to be beasts.

As someone else noted, it's not that easy to distinguish between the pain of being a man, and the pain of being myself, it's part of who I am, and I'm not sure if I can readily divide the universal and objective from the personal and subjective - part of the pain of being man for me is simply the expectations, they can be a real pain, act this way, think like this, I'm always being told how I should act and feel, like I'm playing a role, and not just being myself, and it's all bullshit - I remember my brother telling me not to cross my legs like a girl, "guys cross their legs like this" (the ankle on the knee) - fuck that, it's bad for your knees, the older guys when I was a kid crossed their legs without the ankle on the knee thing, and shit they went and fought in wars in foreign countries, got shot at, killed people, crap like that that nothing to do with being a man, being a man is about doing what needs to be done, even if it's unpleasant and difficult, but for some people, it seems to be largely about looking manly while avoiding all work and responsibility - so there's Two kinds of pain for ya, doing the right thing and getting nothing but dumped on and disrespected for it, and gaffing shit off to the adulation of the masses, but knowing deep down you're really just letting shit slide, and it's going to come back and haunt you.

There's really just too much to go into right now, but suffice it to say men are objectified in ways that go way beyond being a sex object, we're responsible for every damn thing, not only the things we're actually responsible for, but simply by virtue or being part of the "patriarchy", responsible for everything every other hoser has done.

I haven't been to any meetings on this, if there's a patriarchy convention somewhere, I wasn't invited, and ultimately being a man is just putting up with all of this shit without whining about it, and hoping you're lucky enough to find a chick that appreciates it instead of treating you like a fucking ATM.

"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation" - one step ahead of the wolf.

And a chick like that? I fuck the unholy shit out of her, no apologies, cause no way of knowing if that's going to last or it will ever happen again, she shows her throat you go for the kill.

Now that freaks some guys out too, lotsa women seem have difficulty with the pain of being an organic being, with all the sticky substances, mucous membranes, and weird insertions, I mean they're princesses, so what's with this big hairy fucking hole between their legs?

But it is an animal thing, fuck all that "have your people talk to my people, pencil you in for Thursday" shit, lol.

Anyway, I happen to think that part of the pain of being human, is simply reconciling yourself with your organic nature - I mean, like I said, Christianity is practically based on denial of this, the whole body/spirit duality, all these neurosis about the corruption of the flesh - original sin, innate depravity, etc. vs. some abstract concept of sterile purity - it can really fuck with your self image, lol.

But, women have to deal with that shit, I have to deal with them, and that is often a pain.

I don't want to get too far off track, but the Hebrew word for soul, nepesh, means "throat", or "thirst" - it's an itch you can't scratch, a thirst you can't quench, and that can make you crazy, if that make any sense.

I could fuck that all up with a discussion of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system, but I'll leave that for another day, let's just say "it is", and it's never going to change, and we all have to deal with it whether we want to or not, deny it all you want to, it's still there all the same - that's the pain of organic chemistry.

< Message edited by xssve -- 10/11/2011 6:55:14 AM >

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/11/2011 7:09:21 AM   
strongbottom88


Posts: 40
Joined: 9/10/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: strongbottom88

My first reaction to your reaction to my original post is to point out that I was responding specificly to the quote you started the thread with.


Please don't take anything I said in response to your post as a form of criticism. I was simply intrigued. Your post evoked more questions that I tried to articulate in my response. :)


Thanks, once again, for such a thoughtful response. I appreciate it. It's interesting to hear your personal experiences. Again, I enjoyed reading them. Thank you for sharing them. :)



I did not take anything in your response as a criticism of my post. Your response simply made clear to me the part of my post that explained why I enjoy bottoming was incomplete because I was only focusing on the quote from your original post and ignoring issues such as having an attraction for women with a sadistic streak etc.

Not a problem giving a response. It was interesting to reflect a bit and I guess communication whether it be for amusement, or a little bit more serious (educational, self reflexive etc.) is what the forums are for.

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/11/2011 10:51:03 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

But that doesn't tell me anything about your personal take on it...your personal experience.


Like the song goes; "A soldier is always decent and clean while other poor fellows go dirty and mean....."
"Arthur Mc Bride" by Paul Brady


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/11/2011 3:42:52 PM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline

i would like some elaboration there, too. that's interesting. ^_^
quote:



With most their destructiveness is chaotic and wild. Mine is the opposite. Mine is more controlled and focused.

< Message edited by blacksword404 -- 10/11/2011 3:44:19 PM >


_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/13/2011 9:35:10 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

From the posts I've seen here, it would appear that men don't have that sort of pain. Certainly there are societal expectations that make it difficult for men to be human beings...but all in all, it seems that generally speaking, it may not be so difficult to bear that in creates in them this need to be beasts.
Well I came back to this because I've pondered on this question myself, the "nature of man" part of the problem is language, i.e., the definition of "Beast" which in Johnson's day was distinctly pejorative, recall that in the Christian mythos, man is separate from the rest of creation - which is all fine in theory, except that deep down most people know better, so all it does is create more tension - but, we all define beast differently, I associate with the "human animal", i.e., the basic animal instincts that underlie much of our behavior, but as a pejorative, perhaps he is referring to mans inhumanity to man, which we think of as "beastlike", though in fact, you'd be hard pressed to find a beast that acts like that, it really ain't natural, it's typically a stress related behavior - psychopaths are created, originally: malnutrition, abuse and/or neglect causes changes in the brain itself that sort of kick the organism into a primitive survival mode, eradicating the conscience, and this can happen to any mammal.

Starving mice will eat each other, starving people do the same, even though that isn't typical behavior - life in general, first and foremost, seeks to survive, reproduction is really sort of a side effect, complicated to explain, but suffice it to say that life will tend to do what it has to do to... live. And, it's apparently heritable: not every sociopath had a terrible childhood - a lot of people who had terrible childhoods don't become sociopaths, but it appears to subside after a certain number of generations if the stressors that triggered it initially are resolved - as a social species, one that forms symbiotic bonds with others that enable us to survive at all, sociopathy and psychopathy are not stable states.

On the anoetic level, this is just life, but it often entails doing things that cause cognitive dissonance on the noetic level.

Again, religion is full of this stuff: "Grace", which is a sort of symbol of man before the fall, anoetic - the fall itself is the act of becoming self conscious, passing from anoesis to noesis - "who told you thou wast naked"?

The Garden then, represents man in nature, anoetic man, free of moral ambiguity, there is no right or wrong, just life - with consciousness comes the knowledge of good and evil, and the fall is that we know that there is good and evil, but we can't always tell which is which - what is right and wrong when it comes to survival?

The pain is, there is no right answer, there is only that which you do, and you have to live with the things you do, regardless of any outside pronouncement of right or wrong - and there is a lot of cognitive dissonance between what we feel is right and wrong, and what others tell us is right and wrong, often for reasons entirely of their own - which might be wrong - sometime what you know is right, turns out to be wrong, we typically refer to that realization as growth, and it typically involves the realization that although we are all alone, we have to learn to be part of an organic whole.

Anyway, that would be the classical take on it, up to that last part, much of the pain is simply all this second guessing - a Texas saying when there is really no clearly good choice among an array of choice that are equally bad or ambiguous, is: "do something, even if it's wrong".

Lol, anyway, a very anoetic philosophy, faced with complicated choices, it's not surprising that some people simply decide to be selfish and self centered - others may turn to drugs an alcohol, gambling, extreme sports, fighting, women, etc., etc. (I tried everything else, I decided I like women, I guess I'm a breeder at heart) to escape the constant nagging of a conscience in an imperfect world, to escape the consciousness of the self.

I call it "the hole", the void, we all have one, we all try to fill it as best we can, with mixed results.

In the immortal words of Shakespeare, as interpreted by Robin Williams doing an impression of Jack Nicholson doing Shakespeare:

"To be or not to fukin' be - that's the goddamn question. Whether it's better to take the shit, or sling it right back at 'em".

< Message edited by xssve -- 10/13/2011 9:52:38 PM >

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/14/2011 3:37:03 AM   
LillyBoPeep


Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline
what a thought-provoking post (well posts, i should say) xssve. good contributions.

_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica


(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/14/2011 8:27:39 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
Thanks Lilly, shallow perhaps, but when I see a set of curvaceous hip like yourse, it seems to give my life meaning.

But, for a more formal approach, see Existentialism:

quote:

Existentialism is a term applied to the work of several late 19th- and 20th-century philosophers who, despite profound doctrinal differences,[1][2] shared the belief that philosophical thinking begins with the human subject—not merely the thinking subject, but the acting, feeling, living human individual.[3] In existentialism, the individual's starting point is characterized by what has been called "the existential attitude", or a sense of disorientation and confusion in the face of an apparently meaningless or absurd world.[4] Many existentialists have also regarded traditional systematic or academic philosophy, in both style and content, as too abstract and remote from concrete human experience.[5][6]

The early 19th century philosopher Søren Kierkegaard is regarded as the father of existentialism.[7][8] He maintained that the individual is solely responsible for giving his or her own life meaning and for living that life passionately and sincerely,[9][10] in spite of many existential obstacles and distractions including despair, angst, absurdity, alienation, and boredom.[11]
Wikipedia: Existentialism

< Message edited by xssve -- 10/14/2011 8:29:45 AM >

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: He who makes a beast of himself... - 10/14/2011 9:34:45 AM   
LillyBoPeep


Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline
^ haha, nice ^_^ well thanks =p
hooray for lives with meaning!




_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica


(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 78
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: He who makes a beast of himself... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109