HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/12/2011 4:44:27 AM)
|
quote:
I'd say that "I neither accept or reject the existence of god/gods" is totally covered by "agnostic" Well, we'll have to agree on a definition of 'agnostic" then, because to me it doesn't mean "I neither accept or reject the existence of god/gods", to my understanding it means that the question is unanswerable, which matches the Oxford definition quote:
a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God. I don't see that as the same thing at all. The first holds no beliefs at all, the second holds the belief that it can't be known. To me it isn't that there is no answer, i don't even ask the question, and I don't care if there is an answer or not. However, we are getting terribly side-tracked here. We are agreed on a definition of what atheism consists of <Pam's>, and by that definition, it is a religious belief. Now all we have to do is see if we can come to an agreement regarding the other two options and their relationship to atheism. I maintain that each of the three is a unique subset of a larger, broader philosophical category, that I am calling non-theist, to mean that they are views that, for various reasons do not include a god. How is that? can we work with that?
|
|
|
|