Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

China Bashing


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> China Bashing Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
China Bashing - 10/17/2011 8:02:29 AM   
FirstQuaker


Posts: 787
Joined: 3/19/2011
Status: offline
The latest GOP party plank appears to be China bashiong, which in my opinion is a serious error.

quote:

It's open season on China in the Republican race for the presidential nomination, and Mitt Romney is leading the charge. Newt Gingrich and some other candidates are on his heels, painting China as the bogeyman responsible for America's economic ills.Former Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman is the lone holdout, warning against actions that might prompt a trade war.

In a race focused primarily on jobs, taxes and debt, China is emerging as an increasingly prominent foreign policy topic — largely because it is by extension an issue of economics. The debate centers on legitimate gripes over the Asian power's currency value, huge U.S. debt holdings and pirating of American technology. But those issues are often being melded into an all-encompassing populist argument that China is stealing jobs from the United States.


Basically the complaint seems to be that the communists running China are better capitalists, then the capitalists running the Anglospere and the EU are.

"You will sell us the rope we use to hang you with" comes to mind.

Huntsman at least disagrees -

quote:

"I don't subscribe to the Don Trump school or the Mitt Romney school of international trade," Huntsman, the Obama administration's former ambassador to China, said in Tuesday's GOP debate. "I don't want to find ourselves in a trade war. With respect to China, if you start slapping penalties on them ... you're going to get the same thing in return."


And the results could be really not pretty -

quote:

A tit-for-tat trade war would help no one. The United States accelerated the Great Depression in the 1930s by setting sharply higher tariffs on hundreds of foreign goods, sparking international retaliation and the devastation of international commerce. Economists fear a similar wave of protectionism today could plunge the world back into recession.


Obama and Bush administrations hve and had a more measured approach to some of the problems -

quote:

The Obama and Bush administrations have approached China more carefully, targeting with higher import taxes those Chinese goods they felt were selling at artificially low prices while negotiating with Beijing for a fairer currency exchange rate. Despite limited success, they've avoided a blanket punishment of all Chinese goods and any breakdown in relations that would surely make it harder for American products to reach China's booming internal market.


But much of the problem seems to be the US itself -

quote:

Chinese workers earn far less money than Americans, allowing local and American companies that moved manufacturing operations to the country to sell goods on the global market at lower prices. Chinese citizens are less likely to buy as many U.S.-made goods because on average they are far poorer than Americans.

Those nuances have at times been brushed aside, with talk on China focused more on finger-pointing than serious discussion over ending Washington's overreliance on Beijing for purchasing American debt or supplying the economy with cheap consumer goods.


Campaign China-bashing obscures real problems

Not doubt we will hear this reliance on China for money to fund things like wars and the US government, and the offshore production of goods to sell in the US  is again the doing of the factory workers and waitresses, and  Wall Street, multinational corporations, and the US government, have haplessly looked on as this series of events occurred.



Profile   Post #: 1
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 8:18:27 AM   
FirstQuaker


Posts: 787
Joined: 3/19/2011
Status: offline
If there is any doubt just who is running the Chinese banking/financial  system -

quote:

The chairman of the world's most valuable bank was once a good communist, learning from the peasants in a collectivist commune in Jiangxi province and working to raise coal production as a teenage miner in Henan during the tumult of Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution.
Today, Jiang Jianqing has a somewhat bigger job: running the world's biggest bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.

But he does the work for an annual salary that might make a hardened socialist nod with approval. He earned $150,000 in 2010, a mere 1.5 percent of Bank of America Corp CEO Brian Moynihan's estimated $10 million pay last year, and half again smaller than the $20 million Jamie Dimon was paid for running JP Morgan.


And -

quote:

As Jiang's example shows, China's top bank bosses are a different breed to their Western counterparts. Beneath their coiffured hair and tailored suits, the likes of CCB Chairman Guo Shuqing and ICBC's Jiang are first and foremost Communist Party members appointed to their jobs by the government.

China's biggest financial institutions fall under the supervision of the Communist Party, so the bank heads also sit on the party's Central Committee that is ultimately headed by the country's President Hu Jintao.



Running Chinese finance, a different kind of banker


(in reply to FirstQuaker)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 8:45:24 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirstQuaker

But much of the problem seems to be the US itself -

quote:

Chinese workers earn far less money than Americans, allowing local and American companies that moved manufacturing operations to the country to sell goods on the global market at lower prices. Chinese citizens are less likely to buy as many U.S.-made goods because on average they are far poorer than Americans.

Those nuances have at times been brushed aside, with talk on China focused more on finger-pointing than serious discussion over ending Washington's overreliance on Beijing for purchasing American debt or supplying the economy with cheap consumer goods.




The part above sums the problem up nicely for me.

I see it like this. Take two buckets, one nearly full of water, the other nearly empty. Attach a hose with an on/off valve at between the buckets near the bottom of each.

Then open the valve. Bucket 1 will drain into bucket 2 until both reach equilibrium. The amount of water in bucket 1 will be less. The amount in bucket 2 will be greater.

That's the global economy in a nutshell.

I told my brother a long time ago that the status of living in the US had no where to go but down. There's a lot of ranting and raving about the widening gap between rich and poor, but it seems simple to me. When you ship your manufacturing base out of country, a lot of jobs that would have grown here, grow there. Business is like electricity and water. It will migrate to the path of least resistance, and you can't blame them in many respects - if for no other reason than the need to be competitive enough to stay in business. Not only do you lose the jobs that would have grown here, but you lose the base behind those jobs as well.

I know... get retrained... gotcha. Even if you could retrain every living soul in the US, where are they then going to work? I mean hell, half of what you're retraining them for is moving as well because companies have discovered there are programmers, analysts, database people there too, all of whom will work for less money.

Those functioning in the global economy, at least have the opportunity to do well. Those who aren't, namely the people who live and work here, will face an ever decreasing number of good jobs, a shrinking number of places to find them, and a growing service industry as their only option.

I've never been one to believe too strongly in coincidence, but about the same time trade barriers started falling, credit started opening up. Credit financed us through the transition. Where we are now is a place where the jobs aren't coming back and we're starting to realize it. The vast sea of credit that opened up in the late 80's and 90's has been tapped into, fed our economy, and is now kind of like the Aral Sea. It's either dried up or you have folks who bought into it and are now strapped to keep up.

It's why I don't see any real solutions that aren't going to be painful. The banks and big corporations will do well. The people won't, but even if you over throw all the banks and big corporations, the problem is still sitting there. I get it. I do. I swear. Tax the rich. But here's the deal. If you think simply raising taxes on them is going to cure the problem, you're forgetting that the only real monetary input from the whole shebang comes from you. You pay taxes. You pay bills. You buy the goods. Pretty much everyone else plays with your money. If that isn't simple enough, what it boils down to is if you increase anything up above you, you're the one who ends up paying for it.

Firm wrote a post here a while back talking about deep structural change. It is, what is needed, from how global companies work, all the way through politics and politicians. A good bit of America can get on board that general idea. Where it has a huge potential of failing though - and failing in terms of social unrest, social confrontation - is in the details.



_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to FirstQuaker)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 9:04:18 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirstQuaker
Obama and Bush administrations hve and had a more measured approach to some of the problems -

quote:

The Obama and Bush administrations have approached China more carefully, targeting with higher import taxes those Chinese goods they felt were selling at artificially low prices while negotiating with Beijing for a fairer currency exchange rate. Despite limited success, they've avoided a blanket punishment of all Chinese goods and any breakdown in relations that would surely make it harder for American products to reach China's booming internal market.



That said, the chimp did spend a chunk of his first year in office trying to set up China as a terrible new enemy. Christ only knows what the thinking behind that was, but if nothing else good came of the WTC demolition, it at least provided the stupid sod with a better windmill to tilt at before he managed to seriously piss them off.

< Message edited by Moonhead -- 10/17/2011 9:06:39 AM >


_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to FirstQuaker)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 9:21:53 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirstQuaker
quote:

"I don't subscribe to the Don Trump school or the Mitt Romney school of international trade," Huntsman, the Obama administration's former ambassador to China, said in Tuesday's GOP debate. "I don't want to find ourselves in a trade war. With respect to China, if you start slapping penalties on them ... you're going to get the same thing in return."


yes, slap on penalties and you get them back at ya-
Just one recent example of that-
"Mexico imposed the tariffs in 2009 as part of a long-standing dispute over cross-border commercial truck traffic. The duties have cost Northwest fruit growers tens of millions of dollars."

http://www.yakima-herald.com/stories/2011/07/06/deal-with-mexico-ends-tariff-that-cost-state-apple-growers-44m-a-year

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to FirstQuaker)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 9:23:18 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well it is clear that we had run out of Russians by that point. It was sort of becoming shopworn when even the communists are not communist anymore.

So, China. Land of Nixon.

But see here, laddie buck. How do you expect us Americans to get along in this world without enemies, real or imagined?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 9:29:55 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan
I told my brother a long time ago that the status of living in the US had no where to go but down. There's a lot of ranting and raving about the widening gap between rich and poor, but it seems simple to me. When you ship your manufacturing base out of country, a lot of jobs that would have grown here, grow there. Business is like electricity and water. It will migrate to the path of least resistance, and you can't blame them in many respects - if for no other reason than the need to be competitive enough to stay in business. Not only do you lose the jobs that would have grown here, but you lose the base behind those jobs as well.

I know... get retrained... gotcha. Even if you could retrain every living soul in the US, where are they then going to work? I mean hell, half of what you're retraining them for is moving as well because companies have discovered there are programmers, analysts, database people there too, all of whom will work for less money.

hmmm,.. gee, they could work on farms... $150/day and no one wants the jobs.. I have read the same thing about other types of farms too, like dairy farms which would have full-time year round jobs available, no one wants to work on farms. We will see what happens to food prices across the board, it wont be just paying more for apples, it will be paying more for everything you eat. And not because you are paying more for farm labor, it will be cuz of supply being way down so charging more for less..
"In the Wenatchee Valley, apple growers have posted help-wanted signs across the countryside. For the first time in years, growers have also launched a radio campaign, offering up to $150 dollars per day.
"We're not getting anybody to take a bite on these jobs, so we don't have anybody to do these jobs,"

http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2011/10/15/2229400/gregoire-wash-apple-picker-shortage.html

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 9:34:41 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
hmmm,.. gee, they could work on farms... $150/day and no one wants the jobs.. I have read the same thing about other types of farms too, like dairy farms which would have full-time year round jobs available, no one wants to work on farms.

As a matter of interest in Minnesota it is our fourth largest industry, and milkers might get an onsite trailer and a few hundred a month, tops.

Where are these $150 a day jobs (is that cash, 8 hours?) that go begging?

But I must say, none of those trailers are in China, so I might not see the point of it.



< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/17/2011 9:36:13 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 9:41:38 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

hmmm,.. gee, they could work on farms... $150/day and no one wants the jobs.. I have read the same thing about other types of farms too, like dairy farms which would have full-time year round jobs available, no one wants to work on farms.

As a matter of interest in Minnesota it is our fourth largest industry, and milkers might get an onsite trailer and a few hundred a month, tops.

Where are these $150 a day jobs (is that cash, 8 hours?) that go begging?

But I must say, none of those trailers are in China, so I might not see the point of it.

yeah, i see your point, its about bashing China, not about jobs for Americans..

There are food imports from China tho, there is no reason at all why the US cant grow all its own rice!..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 9:49:55 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
How many paddy workers are getting the $150? Seems like alot more work than pulling tits for it twice a day.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/17/2011 9:50:17 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 10:03:02 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

How many paddy workers are getting the $150? Seems like alot more work than pulling tits for it twice a day.

tits.. tits... tits... thats all you men think about..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 10:29:06 AM   
FirstQuaker


Posts: 787
Joined: 3/19/2011
Status: offline
Agricultural workers can rake in the money during harvest season. It is the rest of the year that is the trouble. And a lot of the agricultural work pays "by the piece."

In addition to the Mexican migrants, there are plenty of nationals in both Canada and the US who pack up their kids and "follow the harvest" in the summer.

Even a hunter/gatherer Raven like me learned to tie grapes and picked hops during my college years decades ago, and for good money, too. In fact on of the first race riots in the US was due to imported Chinese undercutting the local Salish hop pickers.
Attack on Squak Valley Chinese laborers, 1885
The trouble today, is most people living in either Canada or the US have little slue on how to do agricultural work, and much of what is done on the farm is actually a skilled trade. Not difficult skills grant you, but without them a person is essentially useless without supervision.

But as for China, faulting them for doing what the US or Canada should be doing and would be doing if either got their hand on the crank, is ironic. Remember, the British invaded China because they could not compete economically (the balance of trade all went one way then too) without forcibly selling them slave produced drugs about 170 years ago. China learned that lesson really well, there will be no Opium War to sort this out in the 21st century.


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 12:10:24 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well it is clear that we had run out of Russians by that point. It was sort of becoming shopworn when even the communists are not communist anymore.

So, China. Land of Nixon.

But see here, laddie buck. How do you expect us Americans to get along in this world without enemies, real or imagined?


Oh, even an Englishman can grok that one, but couldn't he find a commie enemy who doesn't hold a mortgage on half of his country?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 12:11:41 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
It is called Yankee ingenuity, mate.

We never let a good crisis go to waste.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/17/2011 12:12:49 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 12:14:08 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
I hear ya.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 12:16:31 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
You see, old dear, the level of rhetoric in this country has been raised from atomic bombs, to money bombs nowaday.

Electioneering. There be monsters there.



As if we in all our patriotic and fervent capitalism have never understood that the checkbook has the effect of law. Here the commies are cooking our books.



< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/17/2011 12:18:35 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 12:22:26 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
You reckon all of this bitching is spite because all your base is belong to the middle kingdom now?

< Message edited by Moonhead -- 10/17/2011 12:32:18 PM >


_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 12:29:11 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Oi, you had better withdraw that one boyo. While I may agree wholeheartedly with the point of the sentiment, I don't blast, Public Enemy's, 'Off a Pig for Christ' when pulled over by the lads in blue.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 12:31:26 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Seen. I shall fix the c word.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: China Bashing - 10/17/2011 12:33:12 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Right. Much ew-fi-ah.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> China Bashing Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.105