RE: China (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

slvemike4u -> RE: China (11/2/2011 12:53:08 PM)

Here is the thing tazzy,was the confidentiality agreement between Cain and the ladies in question or between the ladies and the rest.association.
if Cain's name is on those agreements,than those ladies have every right to respond to the "high tech character assassinations" he has engaged in these last few days.
I'm hoping the asshole just blew himself up....I can not tell you how pissed I am at this clown,subverting completely the nomination process to his own ends....this fuck needs to be shown that politics is a serious game for serious people....and deals with serious problems,particularly now...we don't need clowns mucking it all up.



tazzygirl -> RE: China (11/2/2011 12:55:36 PM)

Between them and the restaurant association. Apparently the news is now reporting that the RA has contacted the lawyer of one of the ladies and asked him to contact their outside counsel. He stated that he would do so tomorrow after talking to his client tonight.

It could be that we will know more soon.



mnottertail -> RE: China (11/2/2011 12:58:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Yeah, I have the book.

Which book? :)



The man and his era.



slvemike4u -> RE: China (11/2/2011 12:59:39 PM)

Doesn't seem right that the ladies should be held to their end of the agreement while Cain is free to basically accuse them of extortion.
Certainly the oft stated American sense of "fair play" can not allow that sort of heavy handed bullshit.Perhaps some news organization can offer to handle any legal costs incurred in order to get the other side of the story?



kalikshama -> RE: China (11/2/2011 1:00:15 PM)

Thanks for the link...I cannot believe the interviewer moved on after They've indicated that they're trying to develop nuclear capability



ashjor911 -> RE: China (11/2/2011 1:00:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Im more concerned about Syria's attempts to obtain Nukes than China who has had them for decades.


I will have to second that,

Lucy, thanks for letting the avatar come back .......... Damn I Missed it



jlf1961 -> RE: China (11/2/2011 1:13:03 PM)

Cain and Bachman are idiots.

China has had nuclear capability, as has Israel, Pakistan, India, Russia, North Korea, Iran and Syria (both suspected as having the capability to build nukes.)

As for "out building" China, Cain needs to look at China's population as part of the reason they have a big economy, unless he wants Americans to breed like rabbits.



Hillwilliam -> RE: China (11/2/2011 1:16:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashjor911


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Im more concerned about Syria's attempts to obtain Nukes than China who has had them for decades.


I will have to second that,

Lucy, thanks for letting the avatar come back .......... Damn I Missed it

Hey, ashjor, I hope you're still staying safe.



tazzygirl -> RE: China (11/2/2011 1:32:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Doesn't seem right that the ladies should be held to their end of the agreement while Cain is free to basically accuse them of extortion.
Certainly the oft stated American sense of "fair play" can not allow that sort of heavy handed bullshit.Perhaps some news organization can offer to handle any legal costs incurred in order to get the other side of the story?


Im not too sure the RA wants to keep her quiet. That will only lead to more accusations. The only avenue here is to let the story out from all sides.



tazzygirl -> RE: China (11/2/2011 1:33:25 PM)

quote:

unless he wants Americans to breed like rabbits.


I know some american men who are more than willing to take up that cause.



mnottertail -> RE: China (11/2/2011 1:44:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Thanks for the link...I cannot believe the interviewer moved on after They've indicated that they're trying to develop nuclear capability



It is the far right media establishment giving them a pass cuz they know these fuckers are stooooooooooooooooopid.



SpanishMatMaster -> RE: China (11/2/2011 2:09:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Yeah, I have the book.

Which book? :)

The man and his era.
Thanks for the tip.



mnottertail -> RE: China (11/2/2011 2:14:58 PM)

Just thought about this, to insure perfect understanding it is:

"Nikita Khruschev: The Man and His Era."

K?



slvemike4u -> RE: China (11/2/2011 3:36:28 PM)

He had his own era ? Where do I get one of those?



mnottertail -> RE: China (11/2/2011 4:16:28 PM)

you dont think there will be a book out?:

W: destroyer of eras.

I think.



SpanishMatMaster -> RE: China (11/2/2011 8:44:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Just thought about this, to insure perfect understanding it is:
"Nikita Khruschev: The Man and His Era."
K?
:D I guessed so, don't worry. Again, thank you for the tip.



Edwynn -> RE: China (11/2/2011 9:56:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

So for someone to state that China is trying to develop nuclear capability would indicate that this person doesnt know much about China?




Yes! like the person who originated this thread, for example.

We appreciate the honesty, but the bandwidth is another issue.














tazzygirl -> RE: China (11/3/2011 6:20:29 AM)

awwwww.... you are in a snit... how cute!



MadAxeman -> RE: China (11/3/2011 6:33:25 AM)

I read the other day that Scotland has successfully cloned a haggis.



Hillwilliam -> RE: China (11/3/2011 6:34:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MadAxeman

I read the other day that Scotland has successfully cloned a haggis.

That belongs in the "absurd thread".



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125