slaverachel2Him
Posts: 147
Joined: 11/19/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep There's a thread on the FL Masters & slaves group about control-based dynamics, and how they differ from service-based ones. Some of the replies chime in with "well my relationship is XYZ-based." I consider myself a service-oriented person, but to me, they're all kinda wrapped up together. I kinda think I'll just start saying "I'm looking for Metallica-based relationship dynamics." (see sig for reference) Sometimes I think it's a case of overthinking? Sometimes it's a case of semantics? Though I can see how the motivations for the people involved can be wildly different, even if the end result is similar, so in that sense it's not really semantics at all... If you feel like talking about it, what do you think is the basis of your relationship? Control? Service? Authority? I know we have people who are in relationships where they don't "feel submissive," but instead just "do as told." We also have people who do feel submissive, and who feel "servicey" -- but how do you define that? To me, control is a detail thing, and service is an overarching thing, but all of them are aspects of the most important concept, which is obedience, based on his authority. =p At least that's how it works to me. So i don't really see them as totally different exclusive concepts. To me, as I said on FL in case you know what thread I'm talking about, control is the detail of what you wear, where you go, what you eat and when, blah blah blah -- but to me, that's an aspect of service because by submitting to that control, I'm in service to whatever the D's designs are. To me, they're all interconnected and spaghetti-like. =p I'll stop rambling before I confuse myself. I remember a thread on a similar topic, but it was quite a while ago, and I don't remember who started it in order to search it and reference it. I feel like my opinions are a little better formed now than they were, then. i agree with you and i believe you are right about semantics. i think a LOT of fights get started over semantics or who is feeling horny and extra kinky that night-or just had a pissy experience and pick on the verbage etc. i think it is all intertwined and for me it is a lot about loving the sensations i get within obedience, submitting. A high and also hot. Service has a lot to do with internal obedience. We do it because it makes them happy. One service slave said they (he) did it because it got him off working under the threat of CBT if he screwed up the job. As far as sex goes i can't be in the least interested in sex unless i am dominated. Want to be egalitarian? Fine- asexual it is. (for me). So it permeates everywhere for me and i feel that some people have aversions for words that have meannigs that upset them, even though they are actually doing it. i also note that reading series of posts in different threads-most people are VERY inconsistent and do have a lot of changing self definitions living in their heads.
< Message edited by slaverachel2Him -- 1/14/2012 11:41:13 PM >
_____________________________
Master Richard's slave rachel
|