Nosathro -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/9/2011 11:35:14 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic LMAO oh..it is? apparently not he is lying about knowing about them, that the settlements happened and denied knowing the women Last night his party SPOKESMAN said that a politico worker was the son of the accuser and named him on LIVE tv.. He isnt related to her, his mother died in 2009, I found the page with her death notice last night about ten pm, now WHY should anything that comes out of his mouth be believed? Altho it happened 15 years ago(give or take ) they arent looking for double jeopardy, he still did something questionable , and it is relevant. He is running for presidental nomination yes its bloody wide open, he settled with her claim.. guilty or not, he paid to make her go away or to save himself the police charge, I have a feeling we wont find out the truth from him EVER. He has shown himself incapable of it Perhaps there is a clause in the settlement that neither party public speak about it. This is common in many settlements. If there is such clause, then some other then Cain is violating the settlement. Cain denial is his way of compliance. I worked in places where we could not speak to anyone, family as well about our clients unless I had a signed by the client, okay.
|
|
|
|