RE: Who is Sharon Bialek?

RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

FirmhandKY -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/9/2011 6:12:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic then maybe you should try and find a satisfactory link yourself, or... wait, and see what else comes up .. I have looked. I haven't found anything. You were claiming there were two settlements, so I figured you knew what you were talking about, and could source it. Firm

TreasureKY -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/9/2011 6:14:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic oh and the pic of him and Bialek? http://lawsonzepeda.blogspot.com/2011/11/herman-cain-is-this-gal-you-say-you.html?zx=ec527a1fa6b604f It isn't Bialek. Your source is wrong. The photo is "Herman Cain backstage at the recent TeaCon with Amy Jacobson shortly after Cain's alleged encounter with accuser Sharon Bialek." You don't have to take my word for it, of course. See the photo and its caption at the article where it appeared in the Chicago Sun-Times. It would have been nice if your blogger would have bothered to source her information. Even better if she'd bothered to read the caption on the photo. As far as the article "proving" that Cain had met Bialek? He probably did. Does that mean he remembers her? Nope. Even if it had been a photo of Cain with Bialek, it wouldn't mean anything. Floating around goodness knows where, there are similar photographs of me with George W. Bush, with Kay Bailey-Hutchinson, with Phil Gramm... and a boat load of other politicians of whom I don't even recall their names. I guarantee you that they haven't the foggiest idea who I am, nor would they ever recall meeting me or remember my name. lol... And for what it is worth, Phil Gram is a HUGGER! I could, in all honesty, probably make some tenuous claim that he made an inappropriate gesture with me. But it would be stupid to do so on so many levels. [&:]

Owner59 -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/9/2011 6:18:23 PM)
Should we be surprised Cain doesn`t remember some of his victims?

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/9/2011 6:28:49 PM)
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH I never mentioned Phil Gramm I dont are if he is a hugger, WHAT? I dont have problems with men being friendly, flirting or even making jokes, in fact I have been warned not to encourage guys to have "fun" at my lasts white collar job. so my source is wrong, Ill let you email to tell her what you think theres more than enough bullshit to go around for you to second guess ok????

tazzygirl -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/9/2011 6:34:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Ever notice how leftists could blissfully ignore allegations of rape when it came to Bill Clinton? quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Ever noticed how the republicans werent concerned with the length of time when it came to Clinton? Tell me the difference between these two cases.

Nosathro -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 7:42:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic That doesnt make him innocent, by anyones grip on reality however, carry on The whole point of it was that the two women WHO HAD settlements, couldnt address being called liars because of the NON DISCLOSURE agreements, , so the woman Bialek came forward, knowing she would be raked thru the coals and named...thats why shes got the allred woman on her team... she has not asked for any money or made any criminal charges, Are you being intentionally obtuse? We, as a Nation go by "Innocent until Proven Guilty" right now there is a lack witnesses and evidence, it his word against her word. I don't know who to believe but until otherwise I will give Cain the benefit of the doubt.

mnottertail -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 7:54:20 AM)
See that you are as patriotic and evenhanded in your accusals of OWS members, and tell all your friends to join you.

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 8:56:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nosathro quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic That doesnt make him innocent, by anyones grip on reality however, carry on The whole point of it was that the two women WHO HAD settlements, couldnt address being called liars because of the NON DISCLOSURE agreements, , so the woman Bialek came forward, knowing she would be raked thru the coals and named...thats why shes got the allred woman on her team... she has not asked for any money or made any criminal charges, Are you being intentionally obtuse? We, as a Nation go by "Innocent until Proven Guilty" right now there is a lack witnesses and evidence, it his word against her word. I don't know who to believe but until otherwise I will give Cain the benefit of the doubt. its a shame you couldnt do the same in your other knee jerk posts.

thompsonx -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 9:06:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ArizonaBossMan Imagine the media covering this if she were a Republican. Here, I'll do it for you: Conservative Republican Tea Party favorite Mary Hayashi was caught red handed shoplifting... versus how the media covers a liberal democrat: Assemblywoman Mary Hayashi suspected of shoplifting .... you'd never know she was a demo. That's how they roll. That's not how I rolled when i was a reporter... of course, I am no longer a reporter. I had enough. Being a reporter for bellweather elementry school does not exactly qualify you as a journalist.

thompsonx -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 9:10:02 AM)
fr: I wonder what the chances are of her getting a change of venue to her husbands court room?

tazzygirl -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 12:37:13 PM)
quote: There were two woman who almost from the time the incident happened made claims against Clinton as Governor. The Monica incident was only a few months after it happened. Remember Clinton as President went on National Televison to state he did not have sex with Monica, he even gave testimony to that effect to a Federal Grand Jury. Then as more evidence came out, Clinton admitted to having sex with Monica and plead guilty to a charge of lieing to a Federal Grand Jury. Then you say this.... quote: We, as a Nation go by "Innocent until Proven Guilty" right now there is a lack witnesses and evidence, it his word against her word. I don't know who to believe but until otherwise I will give Cain the benefit of the doubt. And you dont see your own hypocrisy? Dont forget, Monica was a willing participant. The women in Cain's case were not.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 12:51:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nosathro quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic That doesnt make him innocent, by anyones grip on reality however, carry on The whole point of it was that the two women WHO HAD settlements, couldnt address being called liars because of the NON DISCLOSURE agreements, , so the woman Bialek came forward, knowing she would be raked thru the coals and named...thats why shes got the allred woman on her team... she has not asked for any money or made any criminal charges, Are you being intentionally obtuse? We, as a Nation go by "Innocent until Proven Guilty" right now there is a lack witnesses and evidence, it his word against her word. I don't know who to believe but until otherwise I will give Cain the benefit of the doubt. LMAO. She's lining up behind a woman who was fired for a false claim of sexual harassment, has a history of and current financial problems and lived in the building and knows David Axelrod, and has the "any case I can get appearance fees for" Allred on her team. Sure shes not interested in money.

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 1:02:33 PM)
sounds like a little bit of envy there

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 1:20:35 PM)
funny that with allred in the picture she(bialek) is automatically lying.

Nosathro -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 5:55:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic funny that with allred in the picture she(bialek) is automatically lying. Gloria Allred had a long history of taking cases that are very public and uses the media for her own political agenda. And no I do not see the hypocrisy.

tazzygirl -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 6:13:09 PM)
"Innocent until Proven Guilty" Something you want for Cain, yet deny to Clinton. Think about it.

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 7:26:43 PM)
Has she ever been found guilty of perjury or stretching the truth or lying?? You dont see an issue with your thinking, I do, but , is what I expected she went after weiner, she went after clinton. Show me where she has been charged and found guilty of lying to protect her client, or covering up bullshit, ??? you dont like her because she chases high celeb cases... but who would you want on your side if you had to go up legally in front of the whole world you wouldnt go with mr pro bono junior. Your bias is showing

tazzygirl -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 7:29:17 PM)
Allred is known as a ball buster. Most men hate her.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 7:35:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nosathro quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic funny that with allred in the picture she(bialek) is automatically lying. Gloria Allred had a long history of taking cases that are very public and uses the media for her own political agenda. And no I do not see the hypocrisy. It even goes beyond taking cases that are very public...she takes every opportunity she can to defend poor helpless women with the flimisiest of claims against Republicans but when the very credible Juanita Broadrick asked for her help against Clinton she was nowhere to be found. Just more of the feminist double standard that is so evident with the View girls.

tazzygirl -> RE: Who is Sharon Bialek? (11/10/2011 7:40:23 PM)
Why dont you ask Allred why.

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875